Well its not really an "implication" given that one of the few things she has gone public with is strongly supporting Israel. Anyway it was given as one reason why her husband takes the line he does, and yes its a more credible one than "he takes his orders from the Israeli embassy&qu...
I am taking that as "I dislike the vibes of the previous post, but don't actually have an argument against it" ;) Again - and yes sometimes I like to play devil's advocate on here, but I mean this at least with total seriousness - your political tendency need to cut out all this "Star...
Actually not quite, the only real difference is that the speaker referred to "Keir Starmer and his Israeli sponsors" and that "so many in the Labour party are supported and funded by Israel". Are you seriously saying that is significantly better? Genuinely, just stay off this stu...
Actually, have remembered the PM's quip now - it was after the Mid Beds byelection and he commented that at least the new Labour MP would actually be more supportive of him than their predecessor for that seat had been. Even lots of the opposition benches found it genuinely funny.
If you say so, I haven't read the whole thing so can't comment. Hughes (whose Twitter account I do look at) aren't exactly the most disinterested observer themselves, though. And the Labour "iron chancellor" isn't exactly a new thing is it. Apart from the almost mythical Snowden, some stil...
Its not blackmail if she decides to quit because of her poor health. Please be serious for once - instead of seeing the blackest, most nefarious conspiracy behind literally EVERYTHING all the time. Not following so many total cranks on Twitter might help. AK, go back and reread your post. I was res...