FlyTheNest

HindleA wrote:Though I still feel married,clarification.

Good to know. So we can be sure you're not drinking, doing drugs and committing crimes like all those properly unmarried men.

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:

HindleA wrote:Though I still feel married,clarification.

Good to know. So we can be sure you're not drinking, doing drugs and committing crimes like all those properly unmarried men.

Oh or fathering multiple children.

I like children

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:

HindleA wrote:Though I still feel married,clarification.

Good to know. So we can be sure you're not drinking, doing drugs and committing crimes like all those properly unmarried men.

Oh or fathering multiple children.

Like one Mr Johnson.

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/con ... 81041.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Unlike Labour, we Conservatives are actually talking about Brexit at our conference
I can understand why Labour doesn’t want to talk about membership or otherwise of the single market and customs union. They don’t know where they stand. We do

Tories think they're making sense
They're expecting people to believe them
They're currently UK government
They're scarier than hell

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... hat-debate" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I was greatly perturbed by the number of times Priti Patel got a mention today.

Stop adding to it then

Humperdinck, Humperdinck, Humperdinck . . .

PorFavor wrote:Humperdinck, Humperdinck, Humperdinck . . .

[youtube]ckGmMO0zbJo[/youtube]

adam wrote:Hammond producing what is described as controversy by telling business leaders they mustn't collaborate with Labour -

Source says much consternation at Hammond's use of the word "collaborate" to describe anyone not actively fighting the rise of Corbyn.

From the daily politics blog

Someone - Paul Mason I think - has commented that if they're having this conversation with business leaders in public, what are they saying to MI6 behind closed doors?

https://nearlylegal.co.uk/2017/10/vulne ... w-medical/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Vulnerability, medical evidence & Now Medical

Nearly Legal-Giles Peaker

Night night.

PorFavor wrote:Night night.

Goodnight, PorFavor

Goodnight, everyone
love,
cJA

https://twitter.com/mrjamesob" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

adam wrote:

adam wrote:Hammond producing what is described as controversy by telling business leaders they mustn't collaborate with Labour -

Source says much consternation at Hammond's use of the word "collaborate" to describe anyone not actively fighting the rise of Corbyn.

From the daily politics blog

Someone - Paul Mason I think - has commented that if they're having this conversation with business leaders in public, what are they saying to MI6 behind closed doors?

He thought he was reliving '68 the other day, now he thinks it's A Very British Coup?

Oversight is better than it was in those days.

http://isc.independent.gov.uk/committee-members" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Though it isn't encouraging that there's not been a new committee formed after the General Election.

tinyclanger2 wrote:
Like one Mr Johnson.

It's amazing how they've by and large got away with this back to basics bollocks.

The FT in 2008 had a good story on the battle over social between the religious conservatives and others trying to be rational. I think Chris Cook wrote it. He quoted one of the latter saying some of the stuff the party had said was very obvious bollocks based on self-selection.

Nice moderniser Mr Cameron did a very nasty deal with IDS and all, and this sort of trash passed below the radar.

Liam Fox apparently talking about unilateral free trade.

Trump will agree to that. So will every other country, I should think.

Heidi Allen‏Verified account
@heidiallen75

More Heidi Allen Retweeted BBC News (UK)
100% unacceptable from anyone, let alone foreign sec. Boris must be sacked for this. He does not represent my party.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;