RoT wrote:George Eaton @georgeeaton 46s46 seconds ago
Brexit irony: pound's slump will push up prices for Brits and reduce them for tourists.
Yes - that'll show the elite*
*meaning to be determined on a case by case basis.
RoT wrote:George Eaton @georgeeaton 46s46 seconds ago
Brexit irony: pound's slump will push up prices for Brits and reduce them for tourists.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... riti-patel" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Brexit debate in parliament would give game away to Brussels, says minister
But if prices here go up (food, fuel, etc etc) surely these increases must be passed on to the customers (ie tourists) who eat, drink, stay in places that have to pay these concomitant higher running costs and so on.RogerOThornhill wrote:tinyclanger2 wrote:https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/plumm ... 00786.html
Airport (Shanghai: 600463.SS - news) bureaux de change are now offering rates of well below €1 per £1, even though the official “interbank” rate at the time of writing was close to €1.11.
Brexit bargains
George Eaton @georgeeaton 46s46 seconds ago
Brexit irony: pound's slump will push up prices for Brits and reduce them for tourists.
Grocer John Papworth is trying to drum up custom at his fruit and veg stall in Chapel Market in Islington, north London, on a sunny Saturday morning. It is hard going. “It’s the only game in the world where the price changes daily, he says. “But now, the pound being so weak is really starting to affect us. I don’t like saying it’s all because of Brexit [which he voted for], but the pound’s fall has definitely made things much worse. Our suppliers have got to pay more, so we’ve got to pay more.”
An elderly woman shopper overhears him and says: “It is all thanks to the people who voted Leave!” At the other end of the market, Peter Fleming, a florist, points to his stock of potted plants which all came from the Netherlands. “It’s this week with the pound stuff that it’s started to really bite. This week it’s gone up 15%. If it gets any worse, we’re going to have to start passing the cost on – or buying less. This is just the start – and all because we’ve voted out.”
Haven't read the full article yet. I'm not feeling very constructively muscular, today.Labour MPs call for ballots to signal open dissent against Corbyn
Move would allow backbenchers to highlight areas on which they think Labour leader is out of step with public
Labour backbenchers are preparing to call for a series of MPs’ ballots to signal their dissent from the party’s leadership on policy areas where they believe Jeremy Corbyn is out of step with mainstream public opinion.
Heathrow expansion, which Corbyn opposes, will be the test case for the new approach, which one critical backbencher called “constructively muscular”. If accepted the proposal could see MPs openly defy the official position of their leader. (Guardian)
Hear! Hear!tinyclanger2 wrote:thank god for ridiculousness.
For political reasons – as I predicted back in June – the Government was loathe to argue that Article 50, once triggered, could nevertheless be reversed. Arguing this would leave our membership of the EU an open book and infect the remainder of the Conservatives’ term in office. The reversibility of the Article 50 case suited the Claimants too. As I have explained above, their legal case that only Parliament could trigger Article 50 is weakened (perhaps fatally) if Article 50 is reversible.
So it seemed as though the question might pass unresolved.
But on Thursday the High Court upset this expedient consensus. The Lord Chief Justice indicated he was not prepared to proceed on a mutual assumption that Article 50 was irreversible. He wanted to decide the point.
!the question whether an Article 50 notification is reversible is a question of European law. And that has a striking consequence. Our courts may need to refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union.
It's worth reading the whole thing.Second, there will be some media excitement. Imagine the delight of our Fourth Estate at the prospect of the Court of Justice playing a part in determining the mechanics of our decision to leave the European Union.
Ironic, no? On what planet does anyone think that Heathrow expansion is particularly popular with the public? Businesses maybe but Joe Bloggs literally could not give a shit. Especially so anyone outside the M25.PorFavor wrote:Haven't read the full article yet. I'm not feeling very constructively muscular, today.Labour MPs call for ballots to signal open dissent against Corbyn
Move would allow backbenchers to highlight areas on which they think Labour leader is out of step with public
Labour backbenchers are preparing to call for a series of MPs’ ballots to signal their dissent from the party’s leadership on policy areas where they believe Jeremy Corbyn is out of step with mainstream public opinion.
Heathrow expansion, which Corbyn opposes, will be the test case for the new approach, which one critical backbencher called “constructively muscular”. If accepted the proposal could see MPs openly defy the official position of their leader. (Guardian)
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... nst-corbyn
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/ ... ing-crisisIrish PM calls Brexit summit to confront looming crisis
Enda Kenny announces unprecedented cross-border talks amid fears over future of Ireland’s borders, exports, security and economy
Irish leaders have warned of an economic “disaster” on both sides of the border without decisive action to confront the effects of Britain’s impending departure from the EU. (Guardian)
(cJA edit)SpinningHugo wrote:But I am afraid I think most MPs are a complete waste of space. There just isn't anything very productive for most of them to do. I know they make much of their constituency work, but unless they have the ear of government (and most don't, and opposition MPs certainly don't) there is not much that most of them can practically do. The number of truly able ones is really small. So, I'd pay them a lot more (double) and make it a high prestige role, to try and attract a few better people. I think that requires cutting the numbers. The frontbenches of both main parties present a very sorry sight, and have done for years,
Chicken, rice and ratatouille. Have a yearning for Yorkshire pudding now, though.tinyclanger2 wrote:has anyone had Yorkshire pudding today? (just asking out of casual interest)
tinyclanger2 wrote:has anyone had Yorkshire pudding today? (just asking out of casual interest)
(my emphasis)tinyclanger2 wrote:http://blogs.ft.com/ftdata/2013/08/01/b ... islatures/
people per legistlative body rep - but craftily merges the HoL and HoC for the last graph. Since we don't vote for the HoL it's not relevant with respect to the boundary review. Anyone who can be arsed separating them out be my guest. My expectation is we'd be looking similar to France and Spain - and then it comes down to what the job is. Like I say - the boundary review doesn't make any sense without reviewing the work done/needed doing.
Not here - I made pasta with a tomato, onion, red pepper, and kale sauce before my other half went back to work tonight. And I washed up!tinyclanger2 wrote:has anyone had Yorkshire pudding today? (just asking out of casual interest)
I'm so sorry. It's unconscionable government jeopardises the lives, work, citizenship and countries with Brexit.PorFavor wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/ ... ing-crisisIrish PM calls Brexit summit to confront looming crisis
Enda Kenny announces unprecedented cross-border talks amid fears over future of Ireland’s borders, exports, security and economy
Irish leaders have warned of an economic “disaster” on both sides of the border without decisive action to confront the effects of Britain’s impending departure from the EU. (Guardian)
I make toad in the hole with lamb chops. Can't abide it with sausages.RogerOThornhill wrote:Thinking of Yorkshire pudding reminds me that I make a very good toad in the hole - the only problem is that the tin is good for 4 and there's only 2 of us...maybe I need to look for a small baking tin.
No. I'd like some. I just realised I'm hungry.tinyclanger2 wrote:has anyone had Yorkshire pudding today? (just asking out of casual interest)
Just eat more.RogerOThornhill wrote:Thinking of Yorkshire pudding reminds me that I make a very good toad in the hole - the only problem is that the tin is good for 4 and there's only 2 of us...maybe I need to look for a small baking tin.
It's the sound someone makes getting to the top of the high mountain, seeing everything they'd come from below now from thetinyclanger2 wrote:CJA - forgive my ignorance: yawp?
Yes, just clearing up the Sunday roast now. Chicken, but Yorkshire's accompany all our roasts, the kids love them.tinyclanger2 wrote:has anyone had Yorkshire pudding today? (just asking out of casual interest)
downcastPorFavor wrote:tinyclanger2 wrote:has anyone had Yorkshire pudding today? (just asking out of casual interest)
No - not today. How are things in the Yorkshire-Pudding-Free-Zone of tinyclanger2ville?
I see those metropolitan elite ways of yours showing through again ...PorFavor wrote:I make toad in the hole with lamb chops. Can't abide it with sausages.RogerOThornhill wrote:Thinking of Yorkshire pudding reminds me that I make a very good toad in the hole - the only problem is that the tin is good for 4 and there's only 2 of us...maybe I need to look for a small baking tin.
tinyclanger2 wrote:I see those metropolitan elite ways of yours showing through again ...PorFavor wrote:I make toad in the hole with lamb chops. Can't abide it with sausages.RogerOThornhill wrote:Thinking of Yorkshire pudding reminds me that I make a very good toad in the hole - the only problem is that the tin is good for 4 and there's only 2 of us...maybe I need to look for a small baking tin.
As the Remainer to Leaver ratio declines, what will "Britain" be like one wonders.https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zea ... -shortages" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?
As New Zealand's construction industry booms, companies have to go overseas to look for skilled workers, and there is plenty of interest.
"We got swamped when the doors opened this morning, and it hasn't slowed down," said Greg Ford from Fletcher Construction at the Down Under Live expo.
Hundreds of people flocked to the recruitment expo near London, many for the same reason.
"After Brexit, I just said 'let's go to New Zealand'," said a woman at the expo looking for a job.
Did it though?PorFavor wrote:@tinyclanger2
My last was a reply to your post - which has disappeared.
Edited to add -
Which read: Beryl?
(Just so's the rest of you don't think I've gone bonkers.)
John Prescott did liken Brexit Britain to the post crash Titanic yesterday. Well done Dave! Not hard at all was it.http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/nor ... h-12032712" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?
Thousands of people including many from the North East are looking for a ‘Plan B’ as the fall out from the European Union referendum vote continues.
With the plunging pound, inflation predicted to rise and question marks about foreign companies like Nissan remaining in the UK, there has been a rush in interest in emigrating.
Its the original statement there would be no new nominations under Corbyn that was the real mistake IMO.PorFavor wrote:I think it was a mistake to elevate Shami Chakrabarti to the House of Lords after having stated that that there would be no names put forward by Labour. Just stupid - and asking for trouble.
I think this is badly wrong, unfortunately. Cooper was excellent on this. There is a great interview with her during the last leadership campaign where she meets someone with serious problems with their benefits, and explains how when Labour were in power she could have done something. Now she can't.citizenJA wrote:(cJA edit)SpinningHugo wrote:But I am afraid I think most MPs are a complete waste of space. There just isn't anything very productive for most of them to do. I know they make much of their constituency work, but unless they have the ear of government (and most don't, and opposition MPs certainly don't) there is not much that most of them can practically do. The number of truly able ones is really small. So, I'd pay them a lot more (double) and make it a high prestige role, to try and attract a few better people. I think that requires cutting the numbers. The frontbenches of both main parties present a very sorry sight, and have done for years,
Your assessment of opposition MPs' work in Parliament isn't accurate. Opposition MPs' work is at least as rigorous and influential as those MPs' in government. They must be ready to for government leadership tomorrow, should occasion call for it, regardless of Fixed-Term Parliaments. Tory MPs' egregiously inadequate performance requirements in government leadership for over six years combined with Labour's recent internal problems left people and country adrift. That lack creates fear, anger and hardship for people.
Greater prestige and more money won't lead to 'better people' being democratically elected representing UK people competently and professionally. Prestige and money are two not very good promoters of talented Parliamentarians. Prestige and money can't buy talented qualities leaders require. Enough money is essential, for all, at the beginning and throughout the life of each person. Ambition is okay enough if combined with other attributes I like in competent leaders - honesty, integrity, strength of character and dedication serving all, not a few. Some yahoo looking for a prestige job can sell high-profile gadgets. What the hell you want one of those characters in government for?