Seems like a storm in a teacup to me. It would be naïve to think that a piece of equipment of that complexity (the missile or the submarine) could be guaranteed to be 100% fault-free. If it was guaranteed, there would be no need to test them.PaulfromYorkshire wrote:#TridentMisfire seems to be getting some traction
I would expect MPs to understand that, and that it wouldn't have a significant effect on any renewal vote.
(Of course, that doesn't mean there are other issues to debate).
It might have been relevant to know what percentage of tests failed but I doubt whether that information will be made public.