Page 4 of 4
Re: Tuesday 10th November 2015
Posted: Tue 10 Nov, 2015 11:52 pm
by RogerOThornhill
Heh.
Someone else noticed that "policy paper" on the DfE too...
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Including this gem.
Well quite - next time you hear Morgan, Gibb or their NSN stooge lauding free schools for more likely to be rated Outstanding than other schools, just remember that they change the goalposts every now and again when it suits.
Those pesky badgers probably...
Re: Tuesday 10th November 2015
Posted: Wed 11 Nov, 2015 12:10 am
by HindleA
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... ts-reforms" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Fresh blow for George Osborne over planned tax credit cuts reforms
Tory-controlled work and pensions select committee rebuke Treasury and call for full rethink of chancellor’s plans
http://www.parliament.uk/business/commi ... hed-15-16/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Tuesday 10th November 2015
Posted: Wed 11 Nov, 2015 12:11 am
by seeingclearly
rebeccariots2 wrote:seeingclearly wrote:These two, Smith snd Osbourne, are playing some betting game with peoples livelihoods, it is very unprincipled to do this, mind you when did that ever stop them. (glum)
I'm hoping you mean Ian Duncan Smith - and not Owen Smith who I think is doing exactly as he should in pointing out how hard the poorest will be hit by both tax credit cuts and / or UC cuts.
yes, of course.
Re: Tuesday 10th November 2015
Posted: Wed 11 Nov, 2015 12:11 am
by LadyCentauria
RogerOThornhill wrote:Thinking about it, I wonder if I ought to do a piece on the revolving door between PX/NSN/DfE/No 10 etc.
Yes. Please. It would be likely to prove instructional.
Re: Tuesday 10th November 2015
Posted: Wed 11 Nov, 2015 12:48 am
by LadyCentauria
citizenJA wrote:Amber Rudd has admitted the UK does not have the right policies in place to meet its EU target of sourcing 15% of energy from renewable sources by 2020, and challenged transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin to help make up the shortfall.
...making up the shortfall by increasing the amount of renewable electricity from sources such as windfarms, which the Tory party has hit with subsidy cuts, was not an option, she said.
“I think it would be a mistake to abandon heat and transport, they need to make their contribution on the renewable targets.”
Buying renewable energy from other European countries was on the table as an option, she said, but would not be desirable. “The desirable option is to deliver it ourselves,” she said, while declining to name which countries the UK would consider buying green energy from. She also rejected claims that the government’s subsidy cuts to renewable electricity over the summer had harmed the UK’s ability to meet the EU target.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/ ... les-target
I don't understand this person or the Tory government she's part of. If renewable energy projects are stopped and fossil fuel projects encouraged, meeting international obligations aren't possible. Tory government violate their own voluntarily agreed upon obligations.
I don't understand it, either, @
cJA. And as for the bit I've 'bolded' in the quote: why should it be either/or? It's going to take subsidies of one kind or another to boost our renewables production (which, after all, form a part of the EU and world Climate Change Agreements targets) and it'll take further subsidies to properly tackle 'heat' (by which one would assume she means loss of heat from domestic/commercial buildings and/or industry) and for 'greening' the transport fleet.