Willow904 wrote:howsillyofme1 wrote:
Ireland reminds me of Aston Villa a few years ago
Whenever there was a transfer in the offing there was always a final comment 'and Aston Villa have expressed their interest and have asked to be kept informed'
'Gizzan EU Agency!' in Yosser Hughes style
Presumably this is one of the very many functions the EU collectively provides that we will now have to replicate unilaterally at addition financial cost or do without, at who knows what cost.
At least if we remain in the single market, our economy has half a chance of not tanking and we will be able to keep up reasonable standards.
We won't remain in the single market, however, if no one other than Farron argues for it. Already the Tory narrative that only a complete withdrawal from single market and customs union fulfils the referendum mandate is taking hold. It will only get harder to overturn this notion the longer it's left unchallenged, yet Corbyn has not once suggested we should stay in the single market.
The backing for the single market from the Welsh Assembly was very welcome, but the conversation needs to be picked up and amplified across the Labour party if it is to rival the Tories' hard Brexit plan in the minds of the public.
I really can't see that being a catalyst for a significant Tory revolt on A50 though - remember I am talking about that particular decision not the negotiation and the position taken after it
One argument seems to be that voting against would somehow remove Labour from blame at some future point if all goes wrong....I think that is a rather big assumption to make and there is no evidence for it
I think the evidence for Labour taking that position leading to a monstering in the press and reducing the opportunities during the debate to get amendments through is a little bit more robust
I have still seen no roadmap to preventing Brexit that is helped by Labour voting against A50 - the only argument seems to be based on potential future damage to the party which is, at best weak.
My contention is that there is no such roadmap and that A50 will be invoked no matter what Labour does...even if they were stridently against then it would still be passed. Added to that I am personally of the opinion that voting for will give more likelihood of getting some meaningful amendments through (with the support of pro-Remain Tories who have also made the same decision as Labour and will vote for)....although I am happy to accept the argument that actually Labour's position actually makes no difference to that.
What I do not get why there is all animosity to Labour and the impression given that they are in a whole lot of trouble (copyright Rentool, amongst others) and that Labour voting for is somehow the critical decision in it passing....the Tories are the ones in trouble as they are the ones taking this disaster through Parliament with the guidance of May's weak speech last week
Take the emotion out, let the vote for A50 go through, get support for some amendments that will help either get a better deal or give a bigger say to Parliament (which is still pro EU remember) and let Starmer do his job
If in a year it is all going Pete Tong then you can tell me I was wrong
PS Willow is right...the time to have been more robust and vote against was the referendum bill....a lot of parties (not just Labour) messed that up