FlyTheNest

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 6:44 pm**

One Whitehall source says: “In recent weeks there have been an increasing number of mentions in cabinet minutes about how Brexit has to be delivered for the sake of the Conservative party. That will be damning when the public inquiry into Brexit happens. The civil service are now finding ways of ensuring that the political decisions that are being taken will one day be fully understood.” (Politics Live, Guardian)

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 6:55 pm**

Just watching Parliament. Mature debate between Starmer. Greening, Grieve etc.

What a pleasure to see our politicians seeking consensus.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 7:21 pm**

gilsey wrote:Lewis Goodall
‏
Verified account

@lewis_goodall
Follow Follow @lewis_goodall
More Lewis Goodall Retweeted David Allen Green
No deal used to be unthinkable, no-one spoke of it. Slowly but surely it grew in appeal and acceptability and became the default for many Brexiters.

Strikes me revocation is now going through same process for remainers. It's astonishing how quickly these things can move.

Part of the problem is that the media aren't properly articulating what 'no-deal' actually is. People think it's us leaving with everything staying the same, not, "we have no treaties, no agreements, no way to import or export".

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 7:44 pm**

refitman wrote:
gilsey wrote:Lewis Goodall
‏
Verified account

@lewis_goodall
Follow Follow @lewis_goodall
More Lewis Goodall Retweeted David Allen Green
No deal used to be unthinkable, no-one spoke of it. Slowly but surely it grew in appeal and acceptability and became the default for many Brexiters.

Strikes me revocation is now going through same process for remainers. It's astonishing how quickly these things can move.
Part of the problem is that the media aren't properly articulating what 'no-deal' actually is. People think it's us leaving with everything staying the same, not, "we have no treaties, no agreements, no way to import or export".

There was a brief item on the news. It was about the EU's "No Deal" plans (they've produced a hefty document, which I've dubbed the "No Deal Handbook") and allied stuff. Visas for European long-stays, financial viability checks, mobile 'phone roaming charges, and much else. It was a short piece which I think has only been on once. We need\ed much more of this sort of information.

Edited - typos, lots of

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 8:27 pm**

George Osborne, the Tory former chancellor and Evening Standard, is among the many on Twitter pointing out that the most senior Tory Brexiters have, according to one report (see 7.44pm), acquired a nickname used by the leaders of the Ku Klux Klan.

George Osborne
✔
@George_Osborne

I’m sorry, is this for real? Have the leaders of the hard Brexiteers just called themselves the same name as the leaders of the Ku Klux Klan? (Politics Live, Guardian)

I'm not sure if this is something they call themselves (either having come up with it or having embraced it) or if it's a case that someone else has described them thus and they (the Hard Brexiters) don't, themselves, use the description. Does anyone here know, please?

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 8:45 pm**

Lisa Nandy having a right old go! And she was one of the MPs that Theresa May was looking to to bail her out (before that stream of consciousness speech).

Edited to add -

Do even her speech-writers dislike Theresa May that much?

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 8:46 pm**

Crace

Not even MPs on stupidity steroids can hope to get near to the prime minister during her descent into incoherence

Ouch!

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/co ... of-failure" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 8:49 pm**

The Crace piece is actually the first clear analysis of today's events I've read!

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 8:54 pm**

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:The Crace piece is actually the first clear analysis of today's events I've read!

I think that his recent coining of "Lino" is brilliant.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 8:56 pm**

Jessica Elgot
✔
@jessicaelgot

Labour source says they do not think Letwin amendment on indicative votes is going to pass.... would be big turnaround from government assumptions this morning
18
8:50 PM - Mar 25, 2019

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 8:58 pm**

Petition at 5,609,613

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 9:11 pm**

Robert Peston
✔
@Peston

BREAKING 1) @oletwinofficial telling supporters he's anxious that in the end he may not have the votes for his parliament-takes-control-of-Brexit motion. 2) Remainy ministers contemplating now whether they have to resign tonight to get his motion over the line. 3) @theresa_may...
94
8:59 PM - Mar 25, 2019 (Politics Live, Guardian)

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 9:25 pm**

PorFavor wrote:
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:The Crace piece is actually the first clear analysis of today's events I've read!
I think that his recent coining of "Lino" is brilliant.

Yes!

I thought the best line was actually

There wasn't much anyone could say in reply to that, so Jeremy Corbyn was in his element.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 9:28 pm**

The sour banyan is literally biting her nails.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 9:31 pm**

Petition at 5,619,426

It seems to be off to a bit of a canter this evening.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 9:35 pm**

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:The sour banyan is literally biting her nails.

Yes, I noticed that. I suppose we should be grateful that she doesn't pick her nose when she's anxious. But she did give a good speech.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 9:51 pm**

Stephen Barclay winding up by doing his level best to insult everyone.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 9:57 pm**

Letwin Amendment now being voted on.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 9:59 pm**

Laura Kuenssberg
✔
@bbclaurak

Richard Harrington, business minister, has resigned according to govt source
178
9:56 PM - Mar 25, 2019 (Politics Live, Guardian)

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:00 pm**

Laura Kuenssberg
‏@bbclaurak

Richard Harrington, business minister, has resigned according to govt source

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:02 pm**

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:09 pm**

Looking good for Letwin

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:14 pm**

329-302

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:15 pm**

Ayes: 329

Noes: 302

Oojah-cum-spiff.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:16 pm**

Snap.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:18 pm**

PorFavor wrote:
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:The Crace piece is actually the first clear analysis of today's events I've read!
I think that his recent coining of "Lino" is brilliant.

Every time Lino speaks we actually know less than we did when we started.

It's true - oblivious, distracted, double-negatives confusing meaning
Is May is leader in name only? Her continued premiership doesn't seem seriously threatened by another Tory taking over. Her government stays there preventing better leadership.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:18 pm**

Been out for the afternoon to the library and for the launch of a new OU centre and come back to see the KKK trending...

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:18 pm**

Alistair Burt also gone\going?

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:21 pm**

As well as Richard Harrington, the Foreign Office minister Alistair Burt and the health minister Steve Brine have also resigned because they voted for the Letwin amendment, government sources have confirmed.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:29 pm**

Steve Brine has resigned (never heard of him, actually)?

Well, that really is rubbing salt in the wounds.

(Boo-boom!)

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:29 pm**

This was an important observation from Ken Clarke

As his amendment does not set out precisely the form that the indicative votes will take, there is a real danger that if everybody votes for their first preference, we will not produce a majority for anything. His amendment does not set out the basis on which the indicative vote motions are to be tabled. How are we to resolve the method by which we table them? The opinion of the hon. Member for Bishop Auckland (Helen Goodman) and myself is that the single transferable vote is the best way to steer people to one conclusion. It will force compromise, except from those who will vote only for their first preference.

Hansard

*edited to keep PF happy

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:31 pm**

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:This was an important observation from Ken Clarke
As his amendment does not set out precisely the form that the indicative votes will take, there is a real danger that if everybody votes for their first preference, we will not produce a majority for anything. His amendment does not set out the basis on which the indicative vote motions are to be tabled. How are we to resolve the method by which we table them? The opinion of the hon. Member for Bishop Auckland (Helen Goodman) and myself is that the single transferable vote is the best way to steer people to one conclusion. It will force compromise, except from those who will vote only for their first preference.
Hamsard

How are you spelling that again?

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:31 pm**

Shaking ritualist bra reveals ministerial resignation (8,4).

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:33 pm**

Margaret Beckett Amendment lost.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:34 pm**

PorFavor wrote:Margaret Beckett Amendment lost.

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:36 pm**

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
PorFavor wrote:Margaret Beckett Amendment lost.

Narrowly - but lost, nevertheless (can't remember the numbers).

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:40 pm**

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
PorFavor wrote:Margaret Beckett Amendment lost.

Doesn't make sense, does it?

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:42 pm**

Voting now on the main motion (as amended by the Letwin Amendment).

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:48 pm**

Ayes: 327

Noes: 300

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:54 pm**

May's WA voted down twice, admits it'll get rejected again and she refuses to move
Unspeakably selfish

Posted: **Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:57 pm**

PorFavor wrote:Ayes: 327

Noes: 300

How can government not be bound by this result?

FlyTheNest

Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019

Re: Monday 25th March 2019