FlyTheNest

— John Rentoul (@JohnRentoul)
November 5, 2014
Don't agree with scoring #PMQs but Ed Miliband won that 6-0.

PorFavor wrote:Can anyone here take at stab at explaining what he's talking about, please?

Debbie Abrahams, a Labour MP, says that 75% of the increase in employment is self-employment, and that the average income for self-employed people is £10,000 a year. The jobs are not out there, she says.

Duncan Smith says he does not accept that. More than two-thirds in the rise in self-employment comes from full-time self-employment, he says. (Andrew Sparrow, Guardian)

Tubby Isaacs wrote:

PorFavor wrote:Can anyone here take at stab at explaining what he's talking about, please?

Debbie Abrahams, a Labour MP, says that 75% of the increase in employment is self-employment, and that the average income for self-employed people is £10,000 a year. The jobs are not out there, she says.

Duncan Smith says he does not accept that. More than two-thirds in the rise in self-employment comes from full-time self-employment, he says. (Andrew Sparrow, Guardian)

"I don't accept that" is the formula they've learnt- Lansley used to do that as well. You then assert something else, which doesn't answer the question.

seeingclearly wrote:Good Morning

Divide and Conquer the North

http://thepublicinterestsheffield.blogs ... l?spref=fb" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Tubby Isaacs wrote:I'm no longer surprised but still disappointed. There are millions of people who've been awarded back pay by the tribunal. Surely Miliband could be going for this? It's money they've earned by law. Sure, some flexibility for employers to pay the claim could be needed. But he has to take the lead in getting this moving.

The tribunal also ruled that workers can make backdated claims, but only for a limited period.

However, the ruling could be referred to the Court of Appeal, meaning a final decision may be years away.

pk1 wrote:

Tubby Isaacs wrote:I'm no longer surprised but still disappointed. There are millions of people who've been awarded back pay by the tribunal. Surely Miliband could be going for this? It's money they've earned by law. Sure, some flexibility for employers to pay the claim could be needed. But he has to take the lead in getting this moving.

What do you expect him to say ?

AFAIK the judgement applies to payments within the last three months so I doubt it's as wide-ranging as was being made out. It also only applies to those who are mandated to work overtime, not voluntarily so I suspect that reduces the numbers considerably.

The BBC article:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-29896810" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The tribunal also ruled that workers can make backdated claims, but only for a limited period.

However, the ruling could be referred to the Court of Appeal, meaning a final decision may be years away.

Appeals probably will be granted so, as yet, there isn't much he can say or do imo.

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Shame about the spelling in the headline though

Who said it: David Cameron or an eight-year-old?

A quiz inspired by David Cameron’s performance at prime minister’s questions today, where he blew a raspberry at Ed Miliband and accused Labour of being “chicken” (OK, the first part is not true). Featuring i100.co.uk contributor Ollie, eight.

With apologies to all eight-year-olds.

http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/w ... ekct2q8Evx

rebeccariots2 wrote:After a run of very difficult and stressful days and lousy weather - I am celebrating today's sunshine and a couple of good things happening with a small brandy.

We've had an unexpected bit of good luck that hopefully will make things a bit easier for our sick dog and us in the months to come - and has given us an interesting insight into drug companies and medication licences, profits and costs. She has failing kidneys - not that common in a dog - especially a young dog. We need to help her by reducing the amount of protein sloshing around in her blood and urine - but for various reasons neither I nor the vet are particularly keen to use the normal ace inhibitors. There is another drug which can act much more specifically on the protein reduction, and has far less of the downsides caused by the normal ace inhibitors - but in animal medicine it is only licensed for cats not dogs (presumably because they don't suffer so much from the conditions it is normally used for). We could use the cat formula for a dog ... but the vet worked out that in the amounts we would need for our dog it would be in excess of £150 a month.

Vets can only prescribe medicines according to a cascade system - i.e. they have to have good justifications for not opting for a standard medicine, and then again for a medicine that isn't licensed for the particular species etc - and so on down the reasoning chain. Suffice it to say that I am actually very happy to have been classified as a 'non compliant owner' at various stages of this justification - along with cost prohibitive - so that our wonderful vet has been able to prescribe the human form for us at the outrageous sum of .... wait for it .... £5.88 per month.

I think we know where quite a lot of the profit margin on such drugs is coming from - our furry friends market.

Chickens! Three Lib Dems quit government to distance themselves from the coalition ahead of election drubbing in 2015
A total of three Lib Dem MPs have quit the government to focus on seats
Whips Mark Hunter and Jenny Willott follow Norman Baker in leaving
Has been suggested they want to distance themselves from coalition
It comes amid fears the Lib Dems could be in for an election drubbing
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -2015.html

pk1 wrote:Good news RR2 - a co-operative vet is worth his weight in gold.

rebeccariots2 wrote:

pk1 wrote:Good news RR2 - a co-operative vet is worth his weight in gold.

She is PK - she very definitely is.

Public housing tenants prefer to pay more under the new 'bedroom tax'
http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/stor ... e/?cs=4110

Rebecca wrote:

rebeccariots2 wrote:

pk1 wrote:Good news RR2 - a co-operative vet is worth his weight in gold.

She is PK - she very definitely is.

My local vets are pretty dire.
They have introduced a pet health plan,for a monthly payment(depending on the size of pet)each animal gets flea/worming,yearly vaccines,2 health checks per year,and access to nurse clinics.Sounds ok,but I strongly suspect sales of expensive products will be pushed.
However,unless you are involved in the plan,the vets won't routinely check over an animal.So,when my pup went for her vaccines they did nothing bar giving an injection,no advice,no weight,no general health check.So,as the vaccines cost only £7(ex husband is a vet),what is the rest of the fee for?
A fellow dog walker took his 2 year old dog because he wouldn't put a paw down.Ended up paying £86 for arthritis treatment,the vet refused to look at the paw unless dog was sedated,cost £160,'in case it bites'.There was a long grass seed stuck in the paw which the owner took out.
Anyway,glad you have a good vet.

rebeccariots2 wrote:

Rebecca wrote:

rebeccariots2 wrote: She is PK - she very definitely is.

My local vets are pretty dire.
They have introduced a pet health plan,for a monthly payment(depending on the size of pet)each animal gets flea/worming,yearly vaccines,2 health checks per year,and access to nurse clinics.Sounds ok,but I strongly suspect sales of expensive products will be pushed.
However,unless you are involved in the plan,the vets won't routinely check over an animal.So,when my pup went for her vaccines they did nothing bar giving an injection,no advice,no weight,no general health check.So,as the vaccines cost only £7(ex husband is a vet),what is the rest of the fee for?
A fellow dog walker took his 2 year old dog because he wouldn't put a paw down.Ended up paying £86 for arthritis treatment,the vet refused to look at the paw unless dog was sedated,cost £160,'in case it bites'.There was a long grass seed stuck in the paw which the owner took out.
Anyway,glad you have a good vet.

Commiserations. That sounds bloody awful. We've been there with awful, disinterested and slack vets over the years. We are actually very lucky that this particular vet has come back from maternity leave when we most need her ... we wouldn't go to any of the other vets in the practice unless it was a terrible emergency. Trouble is - we have virtually no choice - we have to travel a good 40 minutes or so to get to another vets - and they were generally no better, as we found out.

Tubby Isaacs wrote:

seeingclearly wrote:Good Morning

Divide and Conquer the North

http://thepublicinterestsheffield.blogs ... l?spref=fb" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I think he's a bit pessimistic there.

The chance of a Tory mayor winning Sheffield isn't very high. When Johnson won in 2008, the Tories were doing well in London. In 2012, he only just won even with all the help from the media. There isn't a Tory alive who could do that in Sheffield.

I don't think anyone is fooled by who's making the cuts either just because responsibility is devolved.

Is Ukip the only party that cares about the British countryside?
Using brownfield sites for new homes and offices shouldn’t be a question of left or right: our rural environment must be preserved
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... brownfield
... The Conservatives’ planning reform explicitly gives rural development priority over conservation, even authorising “off-plan” building where local people might object. The concept of sustainable development has been defined as profitable. Identikit warehouse and “volume housing” estates now sprawl across the landscape with no thought for environmental impact or cost to the public infrastructure. It is crazy.

Labour likewise wants to discontinue local planning where councils oppose development. The Liberal Democrats are silent. Only Ukip, sensing its chance, has sided with those pleading for a more considered approach to using green land. Nigel Farage’s speech this year to the Campaign to Protect Rural Engand struck terror into many local Conservative parties...

George Eaton @georgeeaton · 19m 19 minutes ago
Significant appointment in Labour reshuffle: left-winger Jon Trickett enters Miliband's office as a senior adviser.

letsskiptotheleft wrote:Lucy Powell any good?

Running Labour's day to day election campaign.

Spacedone wrote:

Tubby Isaacs wrote:

seeingclearly wrote:Good Morning

Divide and Conquer the North

http://thepublicinterestsheffield.blogs ... l?spref=fb" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I think he's a bit pessimistic there.

The chance of a Tory mayor winning Sheffield isn't very high. When Johnson won in 2008, the Tories were doing well in London. In 2012, he only just won even with all the help from the media. There isn't a Tory alive who could do that in Sheffield.

I don't think anyone is fooled by who's making the cuts either just because responsibility is devolved.

I thought it was on the money to be honest. The Tories might not get a mayor in Sheffield but as Doncaster showed just because the council is Labour doesn't mean that the mayor will be and that individual will be invested with a huge amount of unilateral power and the councils will be diminished. The fact that just 2 years after we rejected their attempt to foist a mayor on us they have now come back and made it a stipulation in any increased regional power makes me extremely suspicious as to why they are so desperate to impose a mayor on us.

What they're trying to do is turn us into city states when what we really need is to work interconnectedly.

ChrisDean wrote:Just back from an event in the forest organised by HOOF, trying to get the MSM to notice how the Infrastructure Bill will affect our public woodlands if it passes unamended.


http://www.jonathonporritt.com/blog/infrastructure-bill" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

rebeccariots2 wrote:

ChrisDean wrote:Just back from an event in the forest organised by HOOF, trying to get the MSM to notice how the Infrastructure Bill will affect our public woodlands if it passes unamended.


http://www.jonathonporritt.com/blog/infrastructure-bill" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I really hope they can get some traction in the media re the infrastructure bill - it's very very scary.

I note that Denton in Texas - the home of fracking - has today voted to ban fracking - and many of the comments BTL on the story are pointing out that we in the UK will be pretty powerless to stop anything similar if this bill goes through.

A loud wake up call is needed - urgently.

HindleA wrote:Unsurprisingly,the Republicans took control of the Senate.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-29910542" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ChrisDean wrote:Just back from an event in the forest organised by HOOF, trying to get the MSM to notice how the Infrastructure Bill will affect our public woodlands if it passes unamended.


http://www.jonathonporritt.com/blog/infrastructure-bill" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

letsskiptotheleft wrote:Hear that the Red Faced ****** refused to deny at PMQs that a rise in VAT would pay for any tax cuts.

And still, there are those, out there would still consider voting for him.

Spacedone wrote:

Tubby Isaacs wrote:

seeingclearly wrote:Good Morning

Divide and Conquer the North

http://thepublicinterestsheffield.blogs ... l?spref=fb" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I think he's a bit pessimistic there.

The chance of a Tory mayor winning Sheffield isn't very high. When Johnson won in 2008, the Tories were doing well in London. In 2012, he only just won even with all the help from the media. There isn't a Tory alive who could do that in Sheffield.

I don't think anyone is fooled by who's making the cuts either just because responsibility is devolved.

I thought it was on the money to be honest. The Tories might not get a mayor in Sheffield but as Doncaster showed just because the council is Labour doesn't mean that the mayor will be and that individual will be invested with a huge amount of unilateral power and the councils will be diminished. The fact that just 2 years after we rejected their attempt to foist a mayor on us they have now come back and made it a stipulation in any increased regional power makes me extremely suspicious as to why they are so desperate to impose a mayor on us.

What they're trying to do is turn us into city states when what we really need is to work interconnectedly.

TheGrimSqueaker wrote:

letsskiptotheleft wrote:Lucy Powell any good?

Running Labour's day to day election campaign.

The word is she is there to "steady the ship".

http://labourlist.org/2014/11/powell-jo ... ont-bench/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

letsskiptotheleft wrote:Lucy Powell any good?

Running Labour's day to day election campaign.

citizenJA wrote:

letsskiptotheleft wrote:Lucy Powell any good?

Running Labour's day to day election campaign.

I've no idea.

AngryAsWell wrote:

citizenJA wrote:

letsskiptotheleft wrote:Lucy Powell any good?

Running Labour's day to day election campaign.

I've no idea.

Manchester Central MP good ? - hell yes

citizenJA wrote:good night.

AngryAsWell wrote:Shetland Islanders fight plan to force children to boarding school
Published on November 5, 2014, by Tony Harbron
The Guardian has a report from the Shetlands where secondaries on the outlying islands are facing closure which would mean 11-year-olds sent away from home during the week…

http://schoolsimprovement.net/shetland- ... ing-school" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

SCOTLAND’S education leaders have issued a stark warning of widespread classroom cutbacks with courses, teaching materials, support staff and even teachers facing the axe.
The impact of more swingeing budget cuts means “protecting education is not viable”, the Association of Directors of Education in Scotland (ADES) has warned in evidence to MSPs.
Pupils could find themselves being sent home on a “weekly basis” due to a lack of cover, ­according to unions, while recent warnings of a reduction in the school week are also likely to be on the agenda when Holyrood’s education committee considers the issue tomorrow.
http://www.scotsman.com/news/education/ ... -1-3591911

COUNCILS face a “very real risk” of failing to meet legal obligations on education as a result of spending cuts, according to parent groups and teaching unions.
The challenges facing schools are the “worst-kept secret in Scottish education” and teacher workload is a “ticking time bomb”, Holyrood’s Education and Culture Committee has been told.
http://www.scotsman.com/news/education/ ... -1-3593062

citizenJA wrote:

HindleA wrote:Unsurprisingly,the Republicans took control of the Senate.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-29910542" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The voter turn out was just as low as any fascist regime could wish. Don't ever believe voting doesn't matter. Voting matters. We must save ourselves here, people.