FlyTheNest

TechnicalEphemera wrote:

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:JP Janson De Couet retweeted
Sunny Hundal ‏@sunny_hundal 4m4 minutes ago
Just two Labour MPs want Ed Miliband to stand down? That's quite low. There's about 20 Tory MPs who want Cameron to step down, no? #wato

There is no mechanism in the Labour Party to oust a leader. There is no ready successor, it is Blairite self harm.

Two MPs, Stringer and Danczuk. Pathetic.

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:JP Janson De Couet retweeted
Sunny Hundal ‏@sunny_hundal 4m4 minutes ago
Just two Labour MPs want Ed Miliband to stand down? That's quite low. There's about 20 Tory MPs who want Cameron to step down, no? #wato

At least two Labour MPs have formally called for Miliband to go, BBC says

On the World at One the BBC is saying at least two Labour MPs have formally asked for Ed Miliband to be be replaced.

This from the BBC’s Ross Hawkins.

Some Labour MPs have long insisted in private that the party would be better off without Ed Miliband. Now the BBC has been told that they have gone to the chair of the parliamentary Labour party, Dave Watts, to make their views known. One backbencher said that he had called for the leader to go and been told by a colleague that he had done likewise.

Ross Hawkins @rosschawkins
Follow
Ed Miliband will address this today. Labour source: we're not going to be distracted by noises off now
1:07 PM - 6 Nov 2014

yahyah wrote:Grrr.....

Have finally had a response from the BBC after asking them to confirm/clarify the number of times UKIPers have appeared on Question Time since 2010 and how that may/may not be a lot more than other small parties who had a total of 17 MPs between them.

Typical sh**e BBC evasive answer, not actually tackling my questions and giving a patronising answer.


''Dear Mrs xxxxxxx

Reference xxxxxxxxxx

Thank you for contacting us regarding Question Time.

We understand you have read in a blog that UKIP have appeared on the programme “26 times” and would like to know why this is the case.

We appreciate your concern and while we’re unable to comment on an external blog. The amount of time spent covering a political party depends greatly on the prevailing news agenda, as well as on broader assessments of its electoral support. UKIP have been involved in a number of significant stories affecting UK politics as of late.
In the past few months there have been two high profile defections from the Conservative Party to UKIP, amid speculation that more MPs could follow.
This resulted in the triggering of a by-election in Clacton, which in turn saw UKIP win their first seat in Parliament. UKIP came second in the recent by-election in Heywood and Middleton, only 617 votes behind the Labour Party.
The party’s performance in these by-elections has seen UKIP making inroads in Labour and Conservative strongholds.

Taking all these factors into consideration, it follows that UKIP have featured in our news coverage as of late.
As with any other political party, they have been properly held to account.
The party’s representatives have been suitably pressed and challenged on their policies and positions during flagship programmes like ‘Question Time’, ‘Today’ and ‘Newsnight’.
The 13 October edition of Panorama looked specifically at Nigel Farage’s leadership, exploring his background, business dealings and often controversial political positions.

While discussing core UKIP policies, particularly membership of the EU and immigration, opposing political perspectives have featured, allowing our audience to make up their own minds on the issues at hand.

Thank you again for contacting us.

Kind regards
Patrick Clyde''


I am now going to complain about Patrick Clyde's response, it's obvious they don't even bother to address what you have actually asked/complained about but just send a stock response with a but tacked on.

Anyone ever tried to escalate a request for info/complaint ?
Mr Clyde seems very reluctant to confirm/deny just how many times UKIP have been on QT.

Lonewolfie wrote:I've read a bit this a.m. about how that useless, weak, weird looking absolutely totally unelectable Mr Ed has 'brought 2 close allies into the Shadow Cabinet' and 'called for the cavalry' 'just 6 months before the election' Nothing whatsoever to do with someone fully in control of what they're doing, knowing the MSM are relentlessly negative, knowing there's 6 months 'til the election, knowing Jim Murphy would stand down to focus on Scottish Labour, knowing Lucy Powell works well as the election co-ordinator and that making a change around now starts the ball rolling. I admit to being heartened when I heard Ms Powell stating clearly and categorically the Ed Miliband is a fantastic asset to the Labour Party and she's going to see that he gets out and about bit more, meets a few more people and starts to push back against the negativity. It's almost as thought there is a Party leader who thinks ahead and doesn't take too much notice of tomorrows chip wrappers.

yahyah wrote:Grrr.....

Have finally had a response from the BBC after asking them to confirm/clarify the number of times UKIPers have appeared on Question Time since 2010 and how that may/may not be a lot more than other small parties who had a total of 17 MPs between them.

Typical sh**e BBC evasive answer, not actually tackling my questions and giving a patronising answer.


''Dear Mrs xxxxxxx

Reference xxxxxxxxxx

Thank you for contacting us regarding Question Time.

We understand you have read in a blog that UKIP have appeared on the programme “26 times” and would like to know why this is the case.

We appreciate your concern and while we’re unable to comment on an external blog. The amount of time spent covering a political party depends greatly on the prevailing news agenda, as well as on broader assessments of its electoral support. UKIP have been involved in a number of significant stories affecting UK politics as of late.
In the past few months there have been two high profile defections from the Conservative Party to UKIP, amid speculation that more MPs could follow.
This resulted in the triggering of a by-election in Clacton, which in turn saw UKIP win their first seat in Parliament. UKIP came second in the recent by-election in Heywood and Middleton, only 617 votes behind the Labour Party.
The party’s performance in these by-elections has seen UKIP making inroads in Labour and Conservative strongholds.

Taking all these factors into consideration, it follows that UKIP have featured in our news coverage as of late.
As with any other political party, they have been properly held to account.
The party’s representatives have been suitably pressed and challenged on their policies and positions during flagship programmes like ‘Question Time’, ‘Today’ and ‘Newsnight’.
The 13 October edition of Panorama looked specifically at Nigel Farage’s leadership, exploring his background, business dealings and often controversial political positions.

While discussing core UKIP policies, particularly membership of the EU and immigration, opposing political perspectives have featured, allowing our audience to make up their own minds on the issues at hand.

Thank you again for contacting us.

Kind regards
Patrick Clyde''


I am now going to complain about Patrick Clyde's response, it's obvious they don't even bother to address what you have actually asked/complained about but just send a stock response with a but tacked on.

Anyone ever tried to escalate a request for info/complaint ?
Mr Clyde seems very reluctant to confirm/deny just how many times UKIP have been on QT.

...

Critics and supporters of Miliband alike said they had no knowledge of a letter aimed at removing him.

One supportive shadow minister said: "I'm not aware of any letter and I'm not aware of any conspiracy."

The shadow minister dismissed the criticism of Miliband, blaming "serial dissenters".

Old friend of Nick Clegg gives Lib Dems £30,000 – and then axes 160 jobs
http://tompride.wordpress.com/

pk1 wrote:

...

Critics and supporters of Miliband alike said they had no knowledge of a letter aimed at removing him.

One supportive shadow minister said: "I'm not aware of any letter and I'm not aware of any conspiracy."

The shadow minister dismissed the criticism of Miliband, blaming "serial dissenters".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29935172" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

citizenJA wrote:Everyone - the clocks are an hour ahead on the website posting dates.

It's only 1.38 not 2.38

pk1 wrote:

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:JP Janson De Couet retweeted
Sunny Hundal ‏@sunny_hundal 4m4 minutes ago
Just two Labour MPs want Ed Miliband to stand down? That's quite low. There's about 20 Tory MPs who want Cameron to step down, no? #wato

Stringer & one other (Hoey or Danczuk ??) would be my guess.

I find all this utterly soul-destroying & ultimately it is dragging everybody down, demanding an energy to fight the party from within rather than fighting the enemy ie the govt.

I agree trying to suggest to Lucy Powell that she tries to gain an interview with Elle but I'm not sure suggesting it by twitter is the best method. How about writing it out & sending it to her constituency office ?

Seeing the smirking, fat twats (Neil, Liddle & McBride) on Daily Politics hasn't improved my feelings of despondency which were dealt a blow when I looked at the line up for QT:

Charles Kennedy
Douglas Alexander
Brandon Lewis
Mel Phillips
Matt Forde

although the QT website says Rachel Reeves is a guest


edit to add from Andrew's blog:

At least two Labour MPs have formally called for Miliband to go, BBC says

On the World at One the BBC is saying at least two Labour MPs have formally asked for Ed Miliband to be be replaced.

This from the BBC’s Ross Hawkins.

Some Labour MPs have long insisted in private that the party would be better off without Ed Miliband. Now the BBC has been told that they have gone to the chair of the parliamentary Labour party, Dave Watts, to make their views known. One backbencher said that he had called for the leader to go and been told by a colleague that he had done likewise.

Ross Hawkins @rosschawkins
Follow
Ed Miliband will address this today. Labour source: we're not going to be distracted by noises off now
1:07 PM - 6 Nov 2014

FFS !!

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:

citizenJA wrote:Everyone - the clocks are an hour ahead on the website posting dates.

It's only 1.38 not 2.38

Hi JA

That's your personal settings!

You need to go to User Control Panel (top right) then click on Board Preferences or something (left) and uncheck summertime

7:01AM BST 18 Oct 2010

SIR – It has been suggested that the deficit reduction programme set out by George Osborne in his emergency Budget should be watered down and spread over more than one parliament. We believe that this would be a mistake.
Addressing the debt problem in a decisive way will improve business and consumer confidence. Reducing the deficit more slowly would mean additional borrowing every year, higher national debt, and therefore higher spending on interest payments.
The cost of delay would result in almost £100 billion of additional national debt by the end of this parliament alone. In the end, the result would be deeper cuts, or further tax rises, in order to pay for the extra debt interest.
The cost of delay could be even greater than this. As recent events in some European countries have demonstrated, if the markets lose faith in Britain, interest rates will rise for all of us.
There is no reason to think that the pace of consolidation envisaged in the Budget will undermine the recovery.
Related Articles
Cut now or pay later, say business leaders 17 Oct 2010
The private sector should be more than capable of generating additional jobs to replace those lost in the public sector, and the redeployment of people to more productive activities will improve economic performance, so generating more employment opportunities.
So, each writing in our personal capacity, we would encourage George Osborne and the Government to press ahead with his plans to reduce the deficit.
In the long run it will deliver a healthier and more stable economy.

Will Adderley
CEO, Dunelm Group

Robert Bensoussan
Chairman, L.K. Bennett

Andy Bond
Chairman, ASDA

Ian Cheshire
Chief Executive, Kingfisher

Gerald Corbett
Chairman, SSL International, moneysupermarket.com, Britvic

Peter Cullum
Executive Chairman, Towergate

Tej Dhillon
Chairman and CEO, Dhillon Group

Philip Dilley
Chairman, Arup

Charles Dunstone
Chairman, Carphone Warehouse Group
Chairman, TalkTalk Telecom Group

Warren East
CEO, ARM Holdings

Gordon Frazer
Managing Director, Microsoft UK

Sir Christopher Gent
Non-Executive Chairman, GlaxoSmithKline

Ben Gordon
Chief Executive, Mothercare

Anthony Habgood
Chairman, Whitbread
Chairman, Reed Elsevier

Aidan Heavey
Chief Executive, Tullow Oil

Neil Johnson
Chairman, UMECO

Nick Leslau
Chairman, Prestbury Group

Ian Livingston
CEO, BT Group

Ruby McGregor-Smith
CEO, MITIE Group

Rick Medlock
CFO, Inmarsat; Non-Executive Director lovefilms.com, The Betting Group

John Nelson
Chairman, Hammerson

Stefano Pessina
Executive Chairman, Alliance Boots

Nick Prest
Chairman, AVEVA

Nick Robertson
CEO, ASOS

Sir Stuart Rose
Chairman, Marks & Spencer

Tim Steiner
CEO, Ocado

Andrew Sukawaty
Chairman and CEO, Inmarsat

Michael Turner
Executive Chairman, Fuller, Smith and Turner

Moni Varma
Chairman, Veetee

Paul Walker
Chief Executive, Sage

Paul Walsh
Chief Executive, Diageo

Robert Walters
CEO, Robert Walters

Joseph Wan
Chief Executive, Harvey Nichols

Bob Wigley
Chairman, Expansys, Stonehaven Associates, Yell Group

Simon Wolfson
Chief Executive, Next

On the other hand, it gives 'weak' Mr Ed the opportunity to slap them down firmly with an 'I'm going nowhere and if you don't like it, you can f*** off' - showing strength, resolve and courage (a bit like he did with Uncle Rupert - a substantially more dangerous opponent). I live in...yada yada I don't suppose the Renegade 2 are particularly popular with their colleagues, either. (2? Really? 2 whole MPs after 4 1/2 years of relentless negativity and fish pointing? I'd say that's a win for Mr Ed!)

Lonewolfie wrote:
On the other hand, it gives 'weak' Mr Ed the opportunity to slap them down firmly with an 'I'm going nowhere and if you don't like it, you can f*** off' - showing strength, resolve and courage (a bit like he did with Uncle Rupert - a substantially more dangerous opponent). I live in...yada yada I don't suppose the Renegade 2 are particularly popular with their colleagues, either. (2? Really? 2 whole MPs after 4 1/2 years of relentless negativity and fish pointing? I'd say that's a win for Mr Ed!)

Labour dismisses leadership threat reports as 'noises off'

Labour sources dispute the BBC claim that Ed Miliband will be making a statement about his leadership this afternoon. (See 1.08pm.) What’s actually happening is that Miliband is doing a TV clip on bus regulation on a regional visit, a source said. The source went on:

This party has been united in our determination to be a one-term opposition for the last four years. We will not led any noises off distract us.

letsskiptotheleft wrote:Blair is 33/1 to 1 FFS.

That's it, the bloke is a clown, no longer will I take him seriously.

letsskiptotheleft wrote:Blair is 33/1 to 1 FFS.

That's it, the bloke is a clown, no longer will I take him seriously.

AnatolyKasparov wrote:

letsskiptotheleft wrote:Blair is 33/1 to 1 FFS.

That's it, the bloke is a clown, no longer will I take him seriously.

It is hardly Smithson's fault that some punters are clueless dickheads, tbf.

AnatolyKasparov wrote:

letsskiptotheleft wrote:Blair is 33/1 to 1 FFS.

That's it, the bloke is a clown, no longer will I take him seriously.

It is hardly Smithson's fault that some punters are clueless dickheads, tbf.

Ian Dunt retweeted
Rob Preece @RobPreeceOnline · 2h 2 hours ago
Barely a week after the probation preferred bidders were announced, it seems that one of the partners has withdrawn.

George Eaton @georgeeaton · 21m 21 minutes ago
Miliband's inclusive leadership style is one reason so few MPs are calling for him to go.

George Eaton @georgeeaton · 19m 19 minutes ago
A marked contrast with Cameron whose backbench critics often feel neglected.

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Interesting at the NS these days. The Editor has called against Miliband as we know, but George Eaton seems to be ever more supportive.

Emma Burnell retweeted
LabourList @LabourList · 3h 3 hours ago
We have a long way to go on gender equality, but today we should praise the Labour Party, argues @EmmaBurnell_ http://labli.st/1sj4AoL" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:BBC Politics retweeted
Chris Mason ‏@ChrisMasonBBC 3m3 minutes ago
Former Labour minister--deeply frustrated with Ed Miliband's leadership--has told me "people normally grow into the role, but he's shrunk."

TheGrimSqueaker wrote:

yahyah wrote:Grrr.....

Have finally had a response from the BBC after asking them to confirm/clarify the number of times UKIPers have appeared on Question Time since 2010 and how that may/may not be a lot more than other small parties who had a total of 17 MPs between them.

Typical sh**e BBC evasive answer, not actually tackling my questions and giving a patronising answer.


''Dear Mrs xxxxxxx

Reference xxxxxxxxxx

Thank you for contacting us regarding Question Time.

We understand you have read in a blog that UKIP have appeared on the programme “26 times” and would like to know why this is the case.

We appreciate your concern and while we’re unable to comment on an external blog. The amount of time spent covering a political party depends greatly on the prevailing news agenda, as well as on broader assessments of its electoral support. UKIP have been involved in a number of significant stories affecting UK politics as of late.
In the past few months there have been two high profile defections from the Conservative Party to UKIP, amid speculation that more MPs could follow.
This resulted in the triggering of a by-election in Clacton, which in turn saw UKIP win their first seat in Parliament. UKIP came second in the recent by-election in Heywood and Middleton, only 617 votes behind the Labour Party.
The party’s performance in these by-elections has seen UKIP making inroads in Labour and Conservative strongholds.

Taking all these factors into consideration, it follows that UKIP have featured in our news coverage as of late.
As with any other political party, they have been properly held to account.
The party’s representatives have been suitably pressed and challenged on their policies and positions during flagship programmes like ‘Question Time’, ‘Today’ and ‘Newsnight’.
The 13 October edition of Panorama looked specifically at Nigel Farage’s leadership, exploring his background, business dealings and often controversial political positions.

While discussing core UKIP policies, particularly membership of the EU and immigration, opposing political perspectives have featured, allowing our audience to make up their own minds on the issues at hand.

Thank you again for contacting us.

Kind regards
Patrick Clyde''


I am now going to complain about Patrick Clyde's response, it's obvious they don't even bother to address what you have actually asked/complained about but just send a stock response with a but tacked on.

Anyone ever tried to escalate a request for info/complaint ?
Mr Clyde seems very reluctant to confirm/deny just how many times UKIP have been on QT.

ArecBalrin/Mason Dixon/Whatever he's calling himself now put in a complaint about that John Humphrys' programme on welfare reform. They tried to fob him off similarly but found out, the hard way, you don't attempt to fob off an autistic guy with the bit between his teeth! Took him a lot of time & persistence to get a decent answer though.

rebeccariots2 wrote:

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:BBC Politics retweeted
Chris Mason ‏@ChrisMasonBBC 3m3 minutes ago
Former Labour minister--deeply frustrated with Ed Miliband's leadership--has told me "people normally grow into the role, but he's shrunk."

Not quite sure why that's funny PfY. (Of course it may be just hysterical giggles or a sardonic stupid 'f****ers' snort of laughter.)

Myself - I'd like to smack the 'former Labour minister' round the chops with a rotten fish - or find a particularly painful way to make them a 'former entire Labour minister'.

rebeccariots2 wrote:

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:BBC Politics retweeted
Chris Mason ‏@ChrisMasonBBC 3m3 minutes ago
Former Labour minister--deeply frustrated with Ed Miliband's leadership--has told me "people normally grow into the role, but he's shrunk."

Not quite sure why that's funny PfY. (Of course it may be just hysterical giggles or a sardonic stupid 'f****ers' snort of laughter.)

Myself - I'd like to smack the 'former Labour minister' round the chops with a rotten fish - or find a particularly painful way to make them a 'former entire Labour minister'.

Private landlords to own £1tn of property by 2015
Figures show sector worth three-and-a-half times more than 2001, with new pension rules likely to see more money flow in (Guardian)

HindleA wrote: Just linking to his blog.For those who don't know he has been banned from the Guardian for some time.

http://masondixonautistic.blogspot.co.uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

What would we make of a modern day Guy Fawkes if we bumped into him under Parliament?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/wh ... ay-4572848

pk1 wrote:

rebeccariots2 wrote:

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:BBC Politics retweeted
Chris Mason ‏@ChrisMasonBBC 3m3 minutes ago
Former Labour minister--deeply frustrated with Ed Miliband's leadership--has told me "people normally grow into the role, but he's shrunk."

Not quite sure why that's funny PfY. (Of course it may be just hysterical giggles or a sardonic stupid 'f****ers' snort of laughter.)

Myself - I'd like to smack the 'former Labour minister' round the chops with a rotten fish - or find a particularly painful way to make them a 'former entire Labour minister'.

Would a couple of these do it for you ?

PorFavor wrote:

Private landlords to own £1tn of property by 2015
Figures show sector worth three-and-a-half times more than 2001, with new pension rules likely to see more money flow in (Guardian)

http://www.theguardian.com/money/2014/n ... 15-renting

ephemerid wrote:

rebeccariots2 wrote:

Frances Ryan @frances__ryan · 16h 16 hours ago
IDS now trialling IN-WORK sanctions. People who reject extra hours will lose benefits via "in-work conditionality". http://www.expressandstar.com/business/ ... -trialled/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; …

This isn't news - the claimants involved are all on Universal Credit.
Which comes with in-built in-work sanctions.

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Good to see Diane Abbott supporting Miliband on Twitter