Page 2 of 4

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:11 pm
by rearofthestore
SpinningHugo wrote:
rearofthestore wrote:Good Morning
A new, very large sample, yougov poll just out for the Times.
Sample size 8271 with very little weighting
CON 34% LAB 33% LD 8% UKIP 14% GREEN 5% SNP/PC 5%
Unweighted just about even CON & LAB slight (CON lead less than 1/2%)
However in the age groups LAB lead convincingly in all but the 60+ agegroup (where Con lead is 14%%) so perhaps Cameron's performance at AGEUK was not just ill judged but stupid.
Link? Where does it say unweighted? That is bad news if those are the raw numbers.
http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cu ... eTimes.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:14 pm
by RogerOThornhill
pk1 wrote:
RogerOThornhill wrote:
pk1 wrote: Did you watch yesterdays with Coburn challenging Chris Leslie, saying Alastair Darling had every intention to increase VAT if Labour had won in 2010 ?

She was most insistent, so much so that I went & found the budget 2010 red book & oh look, what does it say.....
Darling's book quite clearly has him in favour of increasing VAT ahead of the 2010 election in the middle of the financial crisis to raise more tax revenue. Balls is said to have been dead set against the idea as was, crucially, Gordon Brown which is why it didn't happen.
So it was something he put in his own book but was not presented in any budget red book ?
Correct - discussions behind the scenes in 2009ish (from memory) but Balls (which is why he is safe from any accusation of wanting to do it after this election...presuming of course) and Brown both against.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:15 pm
by utopiandreams
@frightful-oik

Are you paying attention?

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:18 pm
by ErnstRemarx
Swarthlander wrote:
ErnstRemarx wrote:...bacon's on, smoked variety today for a change.
Oak or applewood?

Good morning. :)
Oak this time. Fresh crusty white bread too.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:23 pm
by ohsocynical
pk1 wrote:
ohsocynical wrote:Andrew Neil is giving Priti Patel a bit of a hard time....Now to see if they mention the pensioners revolt.
Did you watch yesterdays with Coburn challenging Chris Leslie, saying Alastair Darling had every intention to increase VAT if Labour had won in 2010 ?

She was most insistent, so much so that I went & found the budget 2010 red book & oh look, what does it say.....
ahead of the standard rate of VAT reverting to 17.5 per cent
p192, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. ... mplete.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

so hardly increasing VAT - merely reverting to the rate it had been before he cut it temporarily !


I've just finished reading Alistair Darling's book about the period he was Chancellor...He was absolutely against raising VAT. And yes he wanted to lower it for a while when it was obvious things were going to get tough, and then, when things picked up, to bring it back up in stages to its original level. If I read the book correctly Brown wasn't so keen on it.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:28 pm
by StephenDolan
Shapps lying again.

Grant Shapps did not publish own name on marketing website, analysis finds

http://gu.com/p/47vqp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:29 pm
by citizenJA
ohsocynical wrote:
pk1 wrote:
ohsocynical wrote:Andrew Neil is giving Priti Patel a bit of a hard time....Now to see if they mention the pensioners revolt.
Did you watch yesterdays with Coburn challenging Chris Leslie, saying Alastair Darling had every intention to increase VAT if Labour had won in 2010 ?

She was most insistent, so much so that I went & found the budget 2010 red book & oh look, what does it say.....
ahead of the standard rate of VAT reverting to 17.5 per cent
p192, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. ... mplete.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

so hardly increasing VAT - merely reverting to the rate it had been before he cut it temporarily !


I've just finished reading Alistair Darling's book about the period he was Chancellor...He was absolutely against raising VAT. And yes he wanted to lower it for a while when it was obvious things were going to get tough, and then, when things picked up, to bring it back up in stages to its original level. If I read the book correctly Brown wasn't so keen on it.
Darling's book is my next read, Ohso. Overall, what's your opinion? Generally speaking?

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:35 pm
by pk1
Thanks Roger.

FTN is so much more educational than any political tv show !

(She also said there was IFS evidence of the proposal but I haven't looked for it there because I find their site horrendous to navigate. If of course, you have the time & can lay your fingers on it, I'd be most grateful :D)

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:37 pm
by mikems
Romeo Salvitti = a new Shapps alter ego! And what a moniker! (From linked article.)

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:41 pm
by SpinningHugo
rearofthestore wrote:
SpinningHugo wrote:
rearofthestore wrote:Good Morning
A new, very large sample, yougov poll just out for the Times.
Sample size 8271 with very little weighting
CON 34% LAB 33% LD 8% UKIP 14% GREEN 5% SNP/PC 5%
Unweighted just about even CON & LAB slight (CON lead less than 1/2%)
However in the age groups LAB lead convincingly in all but the 60+ agegroup (where Con lead is 14%%) so perhaps Cameron's performance at AGEUK was not just ill judged but stupid.
Link? Where does it say unweighted? That is bad news if those are the raw numbers.
http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cu ... eTimes.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Thanks. Not quite unweighted, but not much as you say.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:42 pm
by frightful_oik
utopiandreams wrote:@frightful-oik

Are you paying attention?
zzz eh? what? If you mean Ms Wheeler's reading out of a question some helpful spad had written down for her, then yes. I was driving to work as I listened.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:43 pm
by ohsocynical
ephemerid wrote:
ohsocynical wrote:
Lonewolfie wrote:WRT OGRFGs' presentational style (as discussed yesterday)...

I've always seen the Empty Chicken as a bit of a 'low-rent' Tory Bliar - in that there was some sort of direct input into Bliars 'stage presence' (when his elbows mysteriously started to hang slightly further away from his body and the backs of the hands faced forwards/thumb upwards on top of clenched hand to make a particular point...a la the worst POTUS evaaah, Dubya...apparently (I heard from somewhere) this is because it give the impression of 'broad shoulders', 'gravitas' and 'masculinity' (In an asexual way, if that's possible). Yesterdays' performance reminded me very much of a 'warm-up' act at a regional small business invitation evening, trying to enliven the crowd in preparation for the big important person to come on stage and deliver his really serious message...but failing with all the jokes, unable to create a positive ambience and so reverting to attempted gentle bonhomie with said crowd to keep them on (his) side....the word 'unstatesmanlike' doesn't really do him justice. Is that really the best thing the Tories have got going for them?...I think we may see his impression of a clouncy funt before May the 7th....it would be very good if it were at one of the debates (assuming he turns up).
I'm 70 and believe me he was talking down to those pensioners. Some people - not all I hasten to add, but a lot, tend to speak to us as if we're children once we show our age.


I'll allow some of us might have slowed down in the brain box department along with our bodies, but some of us haven't and there's nothing worse than being spoken to in that way. Even doctors do it. They get the sharp end of my tongue when they do.

It's odd, isn't it?

I suspect Cameron has this idea that all women over 60 are sweet biddable little ladies, who look like Miss Marple - forgetting that she had a mind like a razor and a tongue like a whip.....and is fictional!
He probably thinks of older men as retired golf-club faux-military types, full of Scotch and reactionary opinion - he probably thinks they only speak in harrumphs signifying agreement with his views.

Show's 66. He's a pensioner. He is rampantly left-wing, got spied on by government when he was an activist with CND and the NCCL, still does his festivals etc. and earned his living for twenty years managing outdoor rock and roll events.
Cameron wouldn't recognise a man like that. Many people think that pensioners are old and past it when the truth is that most of them have another two decades of useful and active life to go. They're hardly falling to bits.

Many of the people who volunteer for charity are retired people - they see the results of policies. Many people over 60 have children struggling and grandchildren with a very uncertain future. Many of the activists and campaigners for cancer and Alzheimers' charities are pensioners; AgeUK, AgeConcern and other groups rely on the older people in their ranks to raise funds and formulate policy.

Cameron has clearly never met people like this. He is so insulated from real life, and he thinks the electorate (of any age) is so thick that they will believe his lies in the face of all the evidence they live with on a daily basis.

I'd love to be a fly on the wall when you let rip at your GP, OhSo.

Can I come with you next time?
I've exited his surgery on more than one occasion saying Oh for God's sake! when I've got fed up with him treating me as if I'm senile.
I can still bend down and touch the floor with my feet together and sit cross legged and my brain's still sharp. Yes I've got things wrong but according to the hospital the last time I had to go, and though I nearly fell off the perch in my fifties, I'm pretty good for my age.
One time when I got stroppy being told what I was thinking [big mistake] the doc gave me a test for dementia, and was gobsmacked because I was so quick...It hasn't stopped them though and I've sort of shot myself in the foot because my doctor thinks I'm a cantankerous stroppy old biddy and doesn't bother with proper treatment when I need it. Instead I see the locums of which they have a lot.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 12:57 pm
by ohsocynical
citizenJA wrote:
ohsocynical wrote:
pk1 wrote: Did you watch yesterdays with Coburn challenging Chris Leslie, saying Alastair Darling had every intention to increase VAT if Labour had won in 2010 ?

She was most insistent, so much so that I went & found the budget 2010 red book & oh look, what does it say.....
p192, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. ... mplete.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

so hardly increasing VAT - merely reverting to the rate it had been before he cut it temporarily !


I've just finished reading Alistair Darling's book about the period he was Chancellor...He was absolutely against raising VAT. And yes he wanted to lower it for a while when it was obvious things were going to get tough, and then, when things picked up, to bring it back up in stages to its original level. If I read the book correctly Brown wasn't so keen on it.
Darling's book is my next read, Ohso. Overall, what's your opinion? Generally speaking?
Very interesting and quite readable. I was wrong on him wanting to lower Vat. He wanted to raise it, rather than increase the NI contributions.
An earlier budget he [Darling] suggested lowering VAT and then gradually bring it back up in increments, and carry on until it was 20% rather than 17 1/2%

Brown and Ed Balls were dead set against any rises in VAT so Darling was over ruled at the 20% aim.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 1:02 pm
by yahyah
pk1 wrote:
ohsocynical wrote:Andrew Neil is giving Priti Patel a bit of a hard time....Now to see if they mention the pensioners revolt.
Did you watch yesterdays with Coburn challenging Chris Leslie, saying Alastair Darling had every intention to increase VAT if Labour had won in 2010 ?

She was most insistent, so much so that I went & found the budget 2010 red book & oh look, what does it say.....
ahead of the standard rate of VAT reverting to 17.5 per cent
p192, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. ... mplete.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

so hardly increasing VAT - merely reverting to the rate it had been before he cut it temporarily !

The lies that get spouted on politics shows seriously piss me off. :fire:

There was a right wing t*** on Cif yesterday lying that Labour had increased VAT from 15 to 17.5%, completely ignoring the truth that Darling had reduced it to give a temporary boost to the economy.
Oh, for the days when we had a proper Chancellor.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 1:02 pm
by utopiandreams
StephenDolan wrote:Shapps lying again.

Grant Shapps did not publish own name on marketing website, analysis finds

http://gu.com/p/47vqp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
A printing business too, StephenDolan? Rather handy for all those business cards and letterheads he needed. As an aside my favourite card was one given to me by a recording studio that I'd done some work for. It got me into a lot of clubs when I said I'd come to see the band.

Edit: you may infer that I used to like James Garner in the Rockford Files. I should point out however that I never played any games with anyone; I only used the card at the door. My partner/party and I would be ushered in ahead of the queue, usually without paying. Still a bloody cheek, I know. Well, I was young!

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 2:09 pm
by Willow904
Will he now rule out a rise in VAT?

Cameron: In 43 days time I plan to arrange his retirement, but he’s right, straight answers deserve straight questions and the answer is Yes.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/liv ... f521027108" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

So Cameron's ruled out a rise in VAT. Even if he keeps his word it's a worthless promise because he's fettered himself to a fiscal policy that aims to run a surplus and that will involve more tax rises or more cuts than Labour in one form or another. I wouldn't put it past him to raise more money from VAT by removing the exemption on food. He could even pretend it was the EU that made him do it in prep for his amazing renegotiations where he'll doubtless ask for lots of things from the EU that already happen anyway and claim a great victory. I'm getting so tired of this chancer. It's all a game to him. We deserve better.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 2:16 pm
by pk1
AS
Labour rules out increasing national insurance

Ed Balls, the shadow chancellor, has just announced that Labour will not raise national insurance. This is what he told a briefing with journalists.

We will make it clear in the manifesto Labour will not be raising NI. That will be a clear pledge from us.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 2:17 pm
by frightful_oik
straight answers deserve straight questions
The buffoon did actually say that. :D

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 2:19 pm
by frightful_oik
Clarkson's been sacked by the way. Good riddance I say.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 2:29 pm
by Willow904
frightful_oik wrote:Clarkson's been sacked by the way. Good riddance I say.
Here's hoping his mate Cameron enjoys a similar fate on 7th May.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 2:50 pm
by ephemerid
I've been asked by my PPC to make a statement on his campaign leaflets (he wants a pic too, but I'm trying to avoid that)

I've said - "I'm voting Labour because it is the moral thing to do. I think some people will not survive another Tory-led government, and it is the poor and vulnerable who have suffered the most in recent years"

I need to say something positive about Labour's policies - short and snappy - suggestions, anyone?

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 2:54 pm
by pk1
ephemerid wrote:I've been asked by my PPC to make a statement on his campaign leaflets (he wants a pic too, but I'm trying to avoid that)

I've said - "I'm voting Labour because it is the moral thing to do. I think some people will not survive another Tory-led government, and it is the poor and vulnerable who have suffered the most in recent years"

I need to say something positive about Labour's policies - short and snappy - suggestions, anyone?
How about something like 'Ed Miliband said he wants to govern for the many, not the few' & I agree with Ed ! ?

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 2:54 pm
by ErnstRemarx
ephemerid wrote:I've been asked by my PPC to make a statement on his campaign leaflets (he wants a pic too, but I'm trying to avoid that)

I've said - "I'm voting Labour because it is the moral thing to do. I think some people will not survive another Tory-led government, and it is the poor and vulnerable who have suffered the most in recent years"

I need to say something positive about Labour's policies - short and snappy - suggestions, anyone?
"fairness at their heart"
"a new start, a better way"
"out with cruelty, in with compassion"

Bit hackneyed, I know, but you did ask...

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 2:55 pm
by ErnstRemarx
Re:Clarkson - bye.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 3:10 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
As is already being pointed out by some:

Labour's plans don't actually require a rise in NI - but the Tory plans, if a VAT rise is ruled out, means either a significant tax hike elsewhere or even deeper cuts.

As usual, short term tactical lobby-wowing "brilliance" from Dave starts to unravel before the day is even out.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 3:13 pm
by frightful_oik
Have the Tories ever explained how they'll pay for those £7bn tax cuts that OGRFPG announced with such a flourish at their conference?

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 3:13 pm
by utopiandreams
ephemerid wrote:I've been asked by my PPC to make a statement on his campaign leaflets (he wants a pic too, but I'm trying to avoid that)

I've said - "I'm voting Labour because it is the moral thing to do. I think some people will not survive another Tory-led government, and it is the poor and vulnerable who have suffered the most in recent years"

I need to say something positive about Labour's policies - short and snappy - suggestions, anyone?
Tough one, ephemerid, and I know what you mean about a positive message. It all seems doom and gloom when we think of what the Tories (and LibDems) have or would do. Of all the slogans/catchphrases that I remember the one that most stood out was something like 'We can do better than this'. Well something along those lines, which only goes to show my lack of attention as I don't quite remember. It was something I expected Ed to keep pushing rather more on.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 3:44 pm
by ohsocynical
ephemerid wrote:I've been asked by my PPC to make a statement on his campaign leaflets (he wants a pic too, but I'm trying to avoid that)

I've said - "I'm voting Labour because it is the moral thing to do. I think some people will not survive another Tory-led government, and it is the poor and vulnerable who have suffered the most in recent years"

I need to say something positive about Labour's policies - short and snappy - suggestions, anyone?
Conscience driven policies. Conscience driven supporters.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 3:54 pm
by PorFavor
David Cameron must be torn between commenting on the BBC personnel story and the news that there were British victims in the 'plane crash. Although he will, presumably, be advised to go on the latter.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:02 pm
by ephemerid
Ok, guys, thanks for the suggestions - I'll let you know what we decide......

VAT - I've been looking into the history of VAT in the UK.

Before VAT, we had Purchase Tax - the more luxurious the goods, the higher the Purchase Tax. All very sensible.

1973 - VAT introduced as a condition for EEC membership at a flat rate of 10% by Anthony Barber.
1974 - VAT standard rate reduced to 8% by Denis Healey with a higher rate of 25% for petrol and luxury goods.
1976 - VAT higher rate reduced to 12.5% by James Callaghan.
No VAT on domestic fuel.

1979 - VAT higher rate abolished and new standard rate of 15% brought in by Geoffrey Howe.
1991 - VAT standard rate raised to 17.5% by Norman Lamont.
1994 - VAT at 8% applied to domestic fuel by Kenneth Clarke.

1997 - VAT on domestic fuel cut to 5% by Gordon Brown.
New exemptions and new rates brought in by Gordon Brown.
2006 - VAT standard rate reduced by Alastair Darling to 15% as a temporary measure for 13 months to boost growth/spending.
More exemptions and new rates introduced by Darling.
2009 - VAT standard rate returned to 17.5% as it was only an interim growth stimulus.

2010 - VAT standard rate increased to 20% by George Osborne.
New rules and charges for caravans, take-away food, etc.

The Tories have imposed rise after rise, and lied about it.
Labour has cut when it can, and not lied about it.

I think that if Osborne gets another chance, he will apply higher rates to things that are currently at lower/zero rates - like domestic fuel.
Or he will just do whatever he wants - we can be certain that it will affect the poor more than the rich.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:05 pm
by ephemerid
ohsocynical wrote:
ephemerid wrote:I've been asked by my PPC to make a statement on his campaign leaflets (he wants a pic too, but I'm trying to avoid that)

I've said - "I'm voting Labour because it is the moral thing to do. I think some people will not survive another Tory-led government, and it is the poor and vulnerable who have suffered the most in recent years"

I need to say something positive about Labour's policies - short and snappy - suggestions, anyone?
Conscience driven policies. Conscience driven supporters.

Ooooh! That's good, OhSo.

May I nick it?

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:25 pm
by PorFavor
According to James Forsyth in this week’s Spectator, David Cameron is actively preparing for a second coalition with the Lib Dems. Here’s an extract. (Andrew Sparrow, Guardian)

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:27 pm
by SpinningHugo
ephemerid wrote:I've been asked by my PPC to make a statement on his campaign leaflets (he wants a pic too, but I'm trying to avoid that)

I've said - "I'm voting Labour because it is the moral thing to do. I think some people will not survive another Tory-led government, and it is the poor and vulnerable who have suffered the most in recent years"

I need to say something positive about Labour's policies - short and snappy - suggestions, anyone?
You need something that will appeal to undecided voters. You aren't trying to appeal to people who will vote Labour anyway.

Using the word 'moral' comes across as sanctimonious. I know you think the Tories are immoral (and I think some of what they have done is immoral, and not just wrong) but that won't persuade the waverers.

Something like

"I'm voting Labour because I believe in justice. We should vote for the party that will make us feel proud of where we live, a country that is judged by how it treats the elderly and vulnerable, whilst giving the best possible start for the young."

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:30 pm
by pk1
SpinningHugo wrote:
ephemerid wrote:I've been asked by my PPC to make a statement on his campaign leaflets (he wants a pic too, but I'm trying to avoid that)

I've said - "I'm voting Labour because it is the moral thing to do. I think some people will not survive another Tory-led government, and it is the poor and vulnerable who have suffered the most in recent years"

I need to say something positive about Labour's policies - short and snappy - suggestions, anyone?
You need something that will appeal to undecided voters. You aren't trying to appeal to people who will vote Labour anyway.

Using the word 'moral' comes across as sanctimonious. I know you think the Tories are immoral (and I think some of what they have done is immoral, and not just wrong) but that won't persuade the waverers.

Something like

"I'm voting Labour because I believe in justice. We should vote for the party that will make us feel proud of where we live, a country that is judged by how it treats the elderly and vulnerable, whilst giving the best possible start for the young."
Nice one SH :)

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:31 pm
by citizenJA
Grant Shapps (Tory party chairman & Tory MP for Welwyn Hatfield) & Mary Creagh (Labour MP for Wakefield)
interviewed by Martha Kearney (BBC journalist)
Today - BBC Radio 4, The World At One

Jon Ashworth MP, Labour’s Shadow Cabinet Office Minister said:
After his car-crash interview, unanswered questions for Grant Shapps are growing
Transcript of Grant Shapps on BBC World at One...

MARTHA KEARNEY:
Of course Grant Shapps, you got into trouble recently by saying on LBC that you didn’t have a second job when you were an MP, when in fact you did, which you described as a ‘screw-up’?

GRANT SHAPPS:
Yeah, well this was seven, eight, nine, ten years ago so I just…just…got a date wrong...

[transcript continues - it didn't get any better for Grant Shapps or Michael Green]

http://press.labour.org.uk/post/1145832 ... unanswered

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:37 pm
by ephemerid
SpinningHugo wrote:
ephemerid wrote:I've been asked by my PPC to make a statement on his campaign leaflets (he wants a pic too, but I'm trying to avoid that)

I've said - "I'm voting Labour because it is the moral thing to do. I think some people will not survive another Tory-led government, and it is the poor and vulnerable who have suffered the most in recent years"

I need to say something positive about Labour's policies - short and snappy - suggestions, anyone?
You need something that will appeal to undecided voters. You aren't trying to appeal to people who will vote Labour anyway.

Using the word 'moral' comes across as sanctimonious. I know you think the Tories are immoral (and I think some of what they have done is immoral, and not just wrong) but that won't persuade the waverers.

Something like

"I'm voting Labour because I believe in justice. We should vote for the party that will make us feel proud of where we live, a country that is judged by how it treats the elderly and vulnerable, whilst giving the best possible start for the young."

That's helpful. Thanks.

Not sure it's sanctimonious - but I'll see what my PPC thinks. It's his leaflet, after all!

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:38 pm
by citizenJA
Grant Shapps did not publish own name on marketing website, analysis finds
Despite claims, detailed checks of web archive fail to show any mention of Tory chair’s name alongside that of his alias, Michael Green


Grant Shapps, the Tory party chair, did not “permanently publish” his full name alongside the alias he used when he operated as an “online marketing millionaire” despite claiming that he did so, according to an analysis of hundreds of pages of his website.

The cabinet minister – who as chairman has a pivotal role in the party’s election campaign – has defended casting himself as Michael Green of software firm How To Corp by saying that his real name was “permanently published on the company’s main website”.

Until recently this claim could not be easily verified as the company’s webpages have been removed from the internet.

However, the Guardian has discovered a web archive that has kept copies of more than 700 instances of How To Corp’s homepage and Michael Green “biography” page between 2002 and 2007. A detailed analysis has failed to show any mention of “Grant Shapps” on any of the firm’s webpages examined by the Guardian.

[further text]

It has also emerged that Shapps claimed more than £2,400 in public funds for printing through his own company. The money was paid out via parliamentary expenses five times between 2005 and 2007 for the printing of postcards, letterheads and posters by PrintHouse Corporation, a company based in Acton, London, that Shapps founded and owns.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... ysis-finds" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:39 pm
by citizenJA
SpinningHugo wrote:
ephemerid wrote:I've been asked by my PPC to make a statement on his campaign leaflets (he wants a pic too, but I'm trying to avoid that)

I've said - "I'm voting Labour because it is the moral thing to do. I think some people will not survive another Tory-led government, and it is the poor and vulnerable who have suffered the most in recent years"

I need to say something positive about Labour's policies - short and snappy - suggestions, anyone?
You need something that will appeal to undecided voters. You aren't trying to appeal to people who will vote Labour anyway.

Using the word 'moral' comes across as sanctimonious. I know you think the Tories are immoral (and I think some of what they have done is immoral, and not just wrong) but that won't persuade the waverers.

Something like

"I'm voting Labour because I believe in justice. We should vote for the party that will make us feel proud of where we live, a country that is judged by how it treats the elderly and vulnerable, whilst giving the best possible start for the young."
(my bold)

That's beautiful.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:40 pm
by PorFavor
@ SpinningHugo

I think that's pretty good. I've taken the liberty of paring it down a bit, though, since I'm guessing space will be an issue.

"I'm voting for the party that will make me feel proud about how we treat the elderly and vulnerable, whilst giving the best possible start for the young. I'm voting Labour."



Oh - and somebody called Zayn Malik has left something called One Direction (presumably another beat combo).

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:41 pm
by ohsocynical
ephemerid wrote:
ohsocynical wrote:
ephemerid wrote:I've been asked by my PPC to make a statement on his campaign leaflets (he wants a pic too, but I'm trying to avoid that)

I've said - "I'm voting Labour because it is the moral thing to do. I think some people will not survive another Tory-led government, and it is the poor and vulnerable who have suffered the most in recent years"

I need to say something positive about Labour's policies - short and snappy - suggestions, anyone?
Conscience driven policies. Conscience driven supporters.

Ooooh! That's good, OhSo.

May I nick it?
Yes Feel free. I hope it helps.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:56 pm
by ohsocynical
Battleground Britain: Lib Dems face uphill battle to hold Taunton Deane
Voters in Liberal Democrat heartland of Somerset wary of accepting apologies and fresh promises after party’s record in coalition

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... nton-deane

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:56 pm
by utopiandreams
PorFavor wrote:@ SpinningHugo

I think that's pretty good. I've taken the liberty of paring it down a bit, though, since I'm guessing space will be an issue.

"I'm voting for the party that will make me feel proud about how we treat the elderly and vulnerable, whilst giving the best possible start for the young. I'm voting Labour."...
My thoughts too, PorFavor, and a special thanks to SpinningHugo. The final 'I'm voting Labour' may be unnecessary given the context. But then it ain't up to me.

Edit: I once read somewhere that whilst was a sign of our age and that the younger generations only used while. It probably doesn't matter given that ephemerid is only a few years my junior (I think) but since the young are specifically mentioned... just a thought.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 4:58 pm
by tinybgoat
SpinningHugo wrote:
ephemerid wrote:I've been asked by my PPC to make a statement on his campaign leaflets (he wants a pic too, but I'm trying to avoid that)

I've said - "I'm voting Labour because it is the moral thing to do. I think some people will not survive another Tory-led government, and it is the poor and vulnerable who have suffered the most in recent years"

I need to say something positive about Labour's policies - short and snappy - suggestions, anyone?
You need something that will appeal to undecided voters. You aren't trying to appeal to people who will vote Labour anyway.

Using the word 'moral' comes across as sanctimonious. I know you think the Tories are immoral (and I think some of what they have done is immoral, and not just wrong) but that won't persuade the waverers.

Something like

"I'm voting Labour because I believe in justice. We should vote for the party that will make us feel proud of where we live, a country that is judged by how it treats the elderly and vulnerable, whilst giving the best possible start for the young."
I Like that, Reminds me of line in Billy Bragg song,'between the wars':-
" I kept the faith & I kept on voting,
not for the Iron Fist, but for the helping hand,
for theirs' is a land with a wall around it,
and mine is a faith in my fellow man"

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 5:09 pm
by citizenJA
Some 25 years ago now, in 1990, a young Grant Shapps hired me as the sole employee of his profitable live bait vending business, House of Maggots, which I didn’t over firmly deny in the Observer last March. Grant Shapps and I spent many a moonlit night at popular Suffolk angling spots filling roadside fridges with comatose larvae, discarding maggots that failed to thrive, talking about our dreams. But who was the Grant Shapps that I imagined I knew all those years ago?
If Grant Shapps was made by little green aliens, what’s left?
If Michael Green doesn’t exist, can we be sure that the Tory party chair is who he says he is?


- Stewart Lee
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... tewart-lee" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I leaned against the outside wall of a public toilet near a building site on the banks of the Tay and rang a mobile number Grant Shapps had given me 25 years ago...Grant Shapps, identifiably and audibly Grant Shapps, snapped “Who gave you this number?” Instead of asking for Grant Shapps, I said: “Is Michael Green there?” “Michael Green is here,” came the reply, “but who and where, I wonder, do you imagine you are, my meddling maggot?”

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 5:20 pm
by tinybgoat
ohsocynical wrote:
letsskiptotheleft wrote:Speculation will no doubt continue as to who will replace the colossus who currently leads the Tory party, I agree that the names mentioned will probably in time fade away. But the up and comers suggested here are a dream for Labour.

Priti Patel, Philip Lee, Stephen Crabb (much hilarity for ohso and RR no doubt) Nicky Morgan, Esther McVey, Liz Truss, it's so bad I am surprised Julie Bailey's cheerleader wasn't mentioned.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general ... xpect.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Philip Lee has about as much personality as a dead fish....
If he looked like a dead fish, would he be Cameron's chosen successor? (sorry :))

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 5:22 pm
by frightful_oik
I wonder if the Graun will resurrect Malcolm Tucker for this election campaign? I quite enjoyed his robust insights. :D

Some good finds by CJA today. Spotters' badge for you.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 5:23 pm
by Eric_WLothian
YouGov poll, as reported in the Scotsman:
Half of 2010 Lib Dem voters said they will definitely or may possibly vote SNP in May while 44 per cent of former Labour voters and 20 per cent of former Conservative voters said the same.
There are other conclusions in a similar vein. Looking at the actual figures:
Today’s YouGov poll of 8,271 UK voters, including 633 in Scotland, suggests the SNP could be on course to take about half of former Liberal Democrat and Labour voters in Scotland, and even a fifth of former Conservative voters.
So YouGov conclusions are based on just 633 respondents picked out of a UK poll. Not, I would think, in the least reliable. The SNP haven't won yet!

http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/59-dism ... -1-3728413

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 5:26 pm
by ephemerid
PorFavor wrote:@ SpinningHugo

I think that's pretty good. I've taken the liberty of paring it down a bit, though, since I'm guessing space will be an issue.

"I'm voting for the party that will make me feel proud about how we treat the elderly and vulnerable, whilst giving the best possible start for the young. I'm voting Labour."



Oh - and somebody called Zayn Malik has left something called One Direction (presumably another beat combo).

This is terrific stuff, Por and everyone - thank you!

Re. Zayn Malik - I have no idea who this is. But he's famous, apparently.
However, the DWP Press Office has tweeted that he can find 700,000-something jobs and helpfully provides a link.
I think that's quite sick, actually.

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 5:28 pm
by ephemerid
Also - excellent article at labourlist.org by Sunny Hundal on austerity and lies - well worth a look.

Right - Matthew will be here shortly - time to put the lippy on and make some decent coffee.....

Re: Wednesday 25th March 2015

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2015 5:30 pm
by citizenJA
frightful_oik wrote:I wonder if the Graun will resurrect Malcolm Tucker for this election campaign? I quite enjoyed his robust insights. :D

Some good finds by CJA today. Spotters' badge for you.
:rock: