AnatolyKasparov wrote:And as far as the ever more ludicrous and puffed up Mandy is concerned, Jez should just ask as J V Dzhughashvilli did of the Pontiff - how many divisions can he call on?
I think that Mandleson's paper - which was leaked and isn't an article - shows that somebody with brains is actually thinking about the car crash that is the current Labour Party.
His analysis in my view is spot on, in particular:
Mandleson thinks Corbyn is unelectable - I agree with him.
But Corbyn will need to demonstrate he is unelectable to the Labour membership before any move to replace him can be contemplated. Which is also true, not least because if he proves to be electable you can simply leave well alone.
I think Mandleson is clearly recognising that the Blairite wing needs to move left and unite with the Smith/Kinnock wing of the party; and that they need a new agenda.
His analysis of Corbyn supporters likely behaviour and impact is also spot on, and his analysis that the mainstream (Labour members who are more in tune with the public mood than Corbynistas - if you believe polling) is quite likely to shrug its shoulders and take a break is also right.
In effect all he is saying is Corbyn supporters will need to see failure before conceding their man isn't the right one, that Labour needs to unite around a less divisive candidate, that he/she isn't likely to be a particularly Blairite candidate, and in the mean time stop plotting because it is pointless and unhelpful.
Mandleson is telling Blairite ultras to move on.
Release the Guardvarks.