FlyTheNest

... with talks in Brussels deadlocked and Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union fewer than 18 months away, the man who oversees the port says he doesn’t know whether to train more customs officers, look at land purchases to ease congestion, or just keep calm and carry on. “Once we understand what it is that has to be done, then we can come up with a better plan,” says Chief Executive Officer Tim Waggott. “At the moment, you tell me what I need to plan for.”

Caroline. It is an honour to share a stage with you - let alone a job!
Thank you on behalf of everyone here.
Thank you for bravely speaking the truth to those in power. And thank you for being OUR thorn in THEIR side.
Conference, I’m completely prepared for this speech.
I’ve got some Soothers.
I’ve got some Blue Tack, just in case any bits of the stage start falling off
And - most importantly - I’ve actually brought a vision for the future of this country.

Suppression of the wealth tax: an historical error

NonOxCol wrote:Hello.

This from someone with a realistic view of what this government's pig's ear Brexit will actually mean:

http://peterjnorth.blogspot.co.uk/2017/ ... -live.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And yet, still a piece of truly breathtaking, stupefying cuntery, writing about social and political turmoil as if he were observing two flies on a windowsill.

Willow904 wrote:

NonOxCol wrote:Hello.

This from someone with a realistic view of what this government's pig's ear Brexit will actually mean:

http://peterjnorth.blogspot.co.uk/2017/ ... -live.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And yet, still a piece of truly breathtaking, stupefying cuntery, writing about social and political turmoil as if he were observing two flies on a windowsill.

So that's the latest Brexiter argument? People under 50 haven't experienced a proper recession so it'll do them good to have their lives ruined like so many people in the 80s because it might force the odd person to be more creative?

NonOxCol wrote:Hello.

This from someone with a realistic view of what this government's pig's ear Brexit will actually mean:

http://peterjnorth.blogspot.co.uk/2017/ ... -live.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And yet, still a piece of truly breathtaking, stupefying cuntery, writing about social and political turmoil as if he were observing two flies on a windowsill.

"Admittedly this is not the Brexit I was gunning for."
But surely the question is - is this the Brexit 51.8% of those who voted in an advisory referendum with a gerrymandered electorate voted for? The leading Brexiteers said that many of the "expectations" outlined above were part of "Project Fear" and that all would be sweetness and light once we threw off the shackles of the EU.

“It is time for us Conservatives to develop a romantic and ethical message of our own ... Unless we do so, I believe that we will never get the strong majority that our country needs.”

PorFavor wrote:

Willow904 wrote:

NonOxCol wrote:Hello.

This from someone with a realistic view of what this government's pig's ear Brexit will actually mean:

http://peterjnorth.blogspot.co.uk/2017/ ... -live.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And yet, still a piece of truly breathtaking, stupefying cuntery, writing about social and political turmoil as if he were observing two flies on a windowsill.

So that's the latest Brexiter argument? People under 50 haven't experienced a proper recession so it'll do them good to have their lives ruined like so many people in the 80s because it might force the odd person to be more creative?

And a jolly good war would help galvanise some of them into action, too.

NonOxCol wrote:Hello.

This from someone with a realistic view of what this government's pig's ear Brexit will actually mean:

http://peterjnorth.blogspot.co.uk/2017/ ... -live.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And yet, still a piece of truly breathtaking, stupefying cuntery, writing about social and political turmoil as if he were observing two flies on a windowsill.

NonOxCol wrote:There is a sequel to that blog I posted, and it is here:

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"My position is somewhat misrepresented...", but I am actually a misanthropic prick who despises "SJW"s, "Corbynistas" and "metro bimbos who scribble for the Grauniad" and see them - not the people actually behind Brexit - as the epitome of self-indulgence, narcissism and destructiveness and the ones who need their comeuppance.

So now you know.

AnatolyKasparov wrote:

NonOxCol wrote:Hello.

This from someone with a realistic view of what this government's pig's ear Brexit will actually mean:

http://peterjnorth.blogspot.co.uk/2017/ ... -live.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And yet, still a piece of truly breathtaking, stupefying cuntery, writing about social and political turmoil as if he were observing two flies on a windowsill.

Hard to see it as anything other than hard-right accelerationism, which is likely to be about as successful as its left wing counterpart has normally been.

SpinningHugo wrote:

AnatolyKasparov wrote:

NonOxCol wrote:Hello.

This from someone with a realistic view of what this government's pig's ear Brexit will actually mean:

http://peterjnorth.blogspot.co.uk/2017/ ... -live.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And yet, still a piece of truly breathtaking, stupefying cuntery, writing about social and political turmoil as if he were observing two flies on a windowsill.

Hard to see it as anything other than hard-right accelerationism, which is likely to be about as successful as its left wing counterpart has normally been.

North is a pretty unpleasant man who shouldn't be linking to.

AnatolyKasparov wrote:He is a strange one, in the mould of Dominic Cummings.

Both can appear to talk sense on occasion (especially on HM Govt's shortcomings) but their underlying belief structure is pretty barmy.

SpinningHugo wrote:

AnatolyKasparov wrote:He is a strange one, in the mould of Dominic Cummings.

Both can appear to talk sense on occasion (especially on HM Govt's shortcomings) but their underlying belief structure is pretty barmy.

No, I don't think so. North is far worse.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

AnatolyKasparov wrote:

SpinningHugo wrote:

AnatolyKasparov wrote:He is a strange one, in the mould of Dominic Cummings.

Both can appear to talk sense on occasion (especially on HM Govt's shortcomings) but their underlying belief structure is pretty barmy.

No, I don't think so. North is far worse.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Oh yeah, that is pretty bad.

AnatolyKasparov wrote:

NonOxCol wrote:There is a sequel to that blog I posted, and it is here:

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"My position is somewhat misrepresented...", but I am actually a misanthropic prick who despises "SJW"s, "Corbynistas" and "metro bimbos who scribble for the Grauniad" and see them - not the people actually behind Brexit - as the epitome of self-indulgence, narcissism and destructiveness and the ones who need their comeuppance.

So now you know.

AbiWilks had a good response to that, as ever

NonOxCol wrote:

AnatolyKasparov wrote:

SpinningHugo wrote:
No, I don't think so. North is far worse.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Oh yeah, that is pretty bad.

And this is even worse:

http://howtobeacompletebastard.blogspot ... t-die.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[In an LBC interview, today] May reiterates she does intend to lead her party into the next general election. (Politics Live, Guardian)

Home Office needs big increase in staff to deal with Brexit, MPs are told

Former senior officials say ‘considerable increase in resources’ is required to avoid more mistakes in immigration decisions (Guardian)