Wednesday 28th February 2018
Posted: Wed 28 Feb, 2018 7:10 am
Morning all.
The world's gone white.
The world's gone white.
The most relevant ( I think) section of the December agreementPaulfromYorkshire wrote:Snow day here today. Happy kids!
How on earth is the so called government getting away with the Ireland situation?
They agreed a deal with the EU to much fanfare and are now choosing not to honour it. It's just pathetic and makes the UK look like utter fools. But of course the Brexit supporting media just cheer them on.
committed ... must ... will ... full alignment... now or in the future ...49. The United Kingdom remains committed to protecting North-South cooperation and to its guarantee of avoiding a hard border. Any future arrangements must be compatible with these overarching requirements. The United Kingdom's intention is to achieve these objectives through the overall EU-UK relationship. Should this not be possible,
the United Kingdom will propose specific solutions to address the unique circumstances of the island of Ireland. In the absence of agreed solutions, the United Kingdom will maintain full alignment with those rules of the Internal Market and the Customs Union which, now or in the future, support North-South cooperation, the all island economy and the protection of the 1998 Agreement.
And remember the media circus around that agreement? They can't just ignore it now because they still haven't solved it.adam wrote:The most relevant ( I think) section of the December agreementPaulfromYorkshire wrote:Snow day here today. Happy kids!
How on earth is the so called government getting away with the Ireland situation?
They agreed a deal with the EU to much fanfare and are now choosing not to honour it. It's just pathetic and makes the UK look like utter fools. But of course the Brexit supporting media just cheer them on.committed ... must ... will ... full alignment... now or in the future ...49. The United Kingdom remains committed to protecting North-South cooperation and to its guarantee of avoiding a hard border. Any future arrangements must be compatible with these overarching requirements. The United Kingdom's intention is to achieve these objectives through the overall EU-UK relationship. Should this not be possible,
the United Kingdom will propose specific solutions to address the unique circumstances of the island of Ireland. In the absence of agreed solutions, the United Kingdom will maintain full alignment with those rules of the Internal Market and the Customs Union which, now or in the future, support North-South cooperation, the all island economy and the protection of the 1998 Agreement.
This is the agreement that Davis was trying to walk away from the moment he was out of the room. It can't be a surprise that the EU are going to nail down exactly what everything means.
The whole December agreement is here.
seems pretty clear to me adam...suppose it is the word 'alignment' that is causing th issue - wonder how they will phrase it in the legal agreementadam wrote:The most relevant ( I think) section of the December agreementPaulfromYorkshire wrote:Snow day here today. Happy kids!
How on earth is the so called government getting away with the Ireland situation?
They agreed a deal with the EU to much fanfare and are now choosing not to honour it. It's just pathetic and makes the UK look like utter fools. But of course the Brexit supporting media just cheer them on.committed ... must ... will ... full alignment... now or in the future ...49. The United Kingdom remains committed to protecting North-South cooperation and to its guarantee of avoiding a hard border. Any future arrangements must be compatible with these overarching requirements. The United Kingdom's intention is to achieve these objectives through the overall EU-UK relationship. Should this not be possible,
the United Kingdom will propose specific solutions to address the unique circumstances of the island of Ireland. In the absence of agreed solutions, the United Kingdom will maintain full alignment with those rules of the Internal Market and the Customs Union which, now or in the future, support North-South cooperation, the all island economy and the protection of the 1998 Agreement.
This is the agreement that Davis was trying to walk away from the moment he was out of the room. It can't be a surprise that the EU are going to nail down exactly what everything means.
The whole December agreement is here.
There's been a lot of this in BTL stuff - words are slippery and semantics can be fun but context is everything. If 'alignment' might arguably be unclear, the United Kingdom will maintain full alignment with those rules of the Internal Market and the Customs Union which, now or in the future, support North-South cooperation, the all island economy and the protection of the 1998 Agreement is much, much clearer. There is little if any doubt about what the rest of the EU think it means - if we think it means something different then perhaps we don't have a stage one agreement after all.howsillyofme1 wrote:...suppose it is the word 'alignment' that is causing the issue...
This.adam wrote: if we think it means something different then perhaps we don't have a stage one agreement after all.
Bradley seeks to defuse Johnson leak row by reaffirming government's commitment to avoiding hard border in Ireland
Andrew Murrison, the Conservative MP who chairs the committee, starts by asking Karen Bradley to clarify the government’s stance on the Irish border.
Bradley says she cannot comment on leaked documents.
But the British government stands resolutely behind the joint report from December.
That means, as the joint report says, there will be no hard border. The UK government has said that, the Irish government have said that, and the EU have said that. That means no physical infrastructure at the border, she says.
She says she has not seen the EU document being published later. (Politics Live, Guardian)
Wriggling like a worm on a hook.BORIS JOHNSON SAYS THE ISSUE OF NORTHERN IRELAND IS BEING USED IN AN ATTEMPT TO KEEP BRITAIN IN A CUSTOMS UNION WITH THE EU
It has been proclaimed, and lo, it must be so. I wonder how. The BTL answer is that 'well, we just won't have any border infrastructure, it's up to the EU / Ireland if they want to, nothing to do with us'.PorFavor wrote:Good morfternoon.
Edited - tidy upBradley seeks to defuse Johnson leak row by reaffirming government's commitment to avoiding hard border in Ireland
Andrew Murrison, the Conservative MP who chairs the committee, starts by asking Karen Bradley to clarify the government’s stance on the Irish border.
Bradley says she cannot comment on leaked documents.
But the British government stands resolutely behind the joint report from December.
That means, as the joint report says, there will be no hard border. The UK government has said that, the Irish government have said that, and the EU have said that. That means no physical infrastructure at the border, she says.
She says she has not seen the EU document being published later. (Politics Live, Guardian)
Also, restaurant chain "Prezzo" (never heard of them) is in trouble.Thousands of jobs at risk as Maplin and Toys R Us fall into administration - business live
Black morning for UK retail as two chains employing over 5,000 people call in the administrators (Guardian)
So we are saying 'no hard border, all will be well' and the EU are saying 'This is what that means in practice'. And we will have a meltdown.The Protocol on Ireland is quite breathtaking in its level of detail. It establishes a "common regulatory area" between north-south, covering customs, VAT, energy, env, agri, product markets and more. This is the enforcement section -- full ECJ jurisdiction over Northern Ireland
Speaker grants Commons urgent question on Boris Johnson leaked letter on Irish border
Kevin Schofield
✔
@PolhomeEditor
BREAKING: Boris Johnson will NOT be answering this UQ for the Government. Junior FCO minister Mark Field will be doing it instead. " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; …
11:21 AM - Feb 28, 2018 (Politics Live, Guardian)
I recalled this cracking Will Self piece on PrezzoPorFavor wrote:Also, restaurant chain "Prezzo" (never heard of them) is in trouble.Thousands of jobs at risk as Maplin and Toys R Us fall into administration - business live
Black morning for UK retail as two chains employing over 5,000 people call in the administrators (Guardian)
https://www.theguardian.com/business/li ... iness-live
I'm dreading it.adam wrote:Comment on the just being published EU paper
So we are saying 'no hard border, all will be well' and the EU are saying 'This is what that means in practice'. And we will have a meltdown.The Protocol on Ireland is quite breathtaking in its level of detail. It establishes a "common regulatory area" between north-south, covering customs, VAT, energy, env, agri, product markets and more. This is the enforcement section -- full ECJ jurisdiction over Northern Ireland
Tories on social media trying to blame Corbyn for this letter being leaked, not sure of their reasoning therePorFavor wrote:Speaker grants Commons urgent question on Boris Johnson leaked letter on Irish border
Kevin Schofield
✔
@PolhomeEditor
BREAKING: Boris Johnson will NOT be answering this UQ for the Government. Junior FCO minister Mark Field will be doing it instead. " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; …
11:21 AM - Feb 28, 2018 (Politics Live, Guardian)
I've had better days at work (Maplin).PorFavor wrote:Also, restaurant chain "Prezzo" (never heard of them) is in trouble.Thousands of jobs at risk as Maplin and Toys R Us fall into administration - business live
Black morning for UK retail as two chains employing over 5,000 people call in the administrators (Guardian)
https://www.theguardian.com/business/li ... iness-live
The Tories are trampling all over a lot of lives, aren't they, just so they can avoid EU tax haven transparency rules. Worried the true level of corruption in this country could be revealed and political pressure to end it may become irresistible, perhaps? Certainly none of their supposed reasons - cheap chlorinated chicken via our fantastic new trade deals or the freedom to have exactly the same workers and environmental rights we have now - seem very convincing somehow.Faisal Islam
@faisalislam
·
27m
Also understand while everyone focussed on Northern Ireland that there is going to be a Gibraltar issue in the draft text - on the non-application of transition unless agreed bilaterally by Spain
Is that because you won't be able to differentiate between the white and the black squares?AnatolyKasparov wrote:Snow has finally arrived here, chess match scheduled for tonight is called off.
Quite understandable those knights could easily fall on landingAnatolyKasparov wrote:Snow has finally arrived here, chess match scheduled for tonight is called off.
The odds too heavily in White's favour there surelyAnatolyKasparov wrote:Snow has finally arrived here, chess match scheduled for tonight is called off.
Except she did, in December. This is getting beyond ridiculous now.Mrs May said "no UK prime minister could ever agree" to this.
The next Carillion?Now hedge funds target Interserve as shares slump 12% following two profit warnings and cash flow concerns
Pretty rare. Though I think it has happened before within recent memory.HindleA wrote:How rare is that?
jaw-droppers increasingHindleA wrote:https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/28m- ... fe2ddbbf40
£28m rough sleeper fund still unspent
---
I'm hoping we can have the meltdown now, rather than May somehow managing to kick the can down the road again.adam wrote:Comment on the just being published EU paper
So we are saying 'no hard border, all will be well' and the EU are saying 'This is what that means in practice'. And we will have a meltdown.The Protocol on Ireland is quite breathtaking in its level of detail. It establishes a "common regulatory area" between north-south, covering customs, VAT, energy, env, agri, product markets and more. This is the enforcement section -- full ECJ jurisdiction over Northern Ireland
They're aiming to halve rough sleeping by 2022 and eliminate it by 2027, I think?HindleA wrote:https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/28m- ... fe2ddbbf40
£28m rough sleeper fund still unspent
A ministerial task force on rough sleeping will meet for the first time next week three months after it was set up.
A £28 million fund to provide accommodation for the homeless established at the same time has yet to distribute any money, officials admitted yesterday. Three pilot areas have been identified but no grants have been made.
Publicity surrounding the recent death of a rough sleeper in Westminster Tube station, within feet of parliament’s entrance, has focused attention on a rise in the numbers. The recent cold snap, which is thought to have contributed to the death of another man on Friday, has added to public concern.
Heather Wheeler, the minister responsible, said that the government would have a new strategy in place by July. A spokesman for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government defended the delay on the grounds that the priority had been to establish an independent panel including charity heads. That met for the first time on February 1.
Speaking in a debate on homelessness, Layla Moran, the Lib Dem MP, said: “Anyone who has visited a town centre recently will know that this is now at a crisis level; indeed, the public accounts committee concluded that it is a national crisis.”