FlyTheNest

Good Morning

Moscow?

?

_________________
“Of all the trees we could've hit, we had to get one that hits back.”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ng-britain


NB 43 % of carers are male,given less likely to view/say as such you can up that figure.I don't think it helpful,quite the opposite,to falsely portray/exaggerate the actual difference.As for "financial",reversing the targeted cuts in particular situations introduced specifically to facillitate care/self care would be a start but of course the word benefits blinds the stupid into unthinking fuckwittery.

Neither Washington nor...

_________________
is this as grown-up as we ever get?

You old Trot,you

PaulfromYorkshire dispatches from all over the world

@Willow

Paul's location.
A running joke since his hello from China.

Good-morning, everyone

_________________
is this as grown-up as we ever get?

So let's get this right.The Government thinks getting more disabled people that have carers into work will help financially whilst introducing loan replacement with interest rather than minimal benefit income,maintains hospital beds must pay for their spare room subject to discretion and advocates increased charging/equalising regime with in a home rather than in own home for any social care that facillitates it.

Making it up as they go along.

Worse
government put thought into it before wheeling it out

bastards

Grenfell happened a year ago?
Time goes by so quickly

Good morfternoon.

At least he managed to make me smile a bit:



https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jun/13/labour-jeremy-corbyn-backbench-revolt-75-mps-brexit-vote

After all the hype there was only one resignation from the Labour front bench above PPS level - somebody voting *against* the amendment.

https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/13066

Changes in councils’ adult social care and overall service spending in England, 2009–10 to 2017–18

SC
"9% lower per person"

(cJA emphasis)
Staff members probably understand without the heads' up.
I'm more than annoyed with what I've emphasised above and I'm not entirely sure why. It's as though people matter to business as tools used, nothing more. I may be mistaken; I may be reading too little or too much into it. I'm unhappy with business and political leadership cavalierly negotiating with millions of peoples' lives. People aren't tools. They don't go on a shelf when convenient for business remaining there until they're needed again. Spreadsheet analysis involving human beings is repugnant to me.

Purposeful harm enacted on the population

oh jesus christ
that's people dead before their time

Increased charging,heightened eligibility

Blame people for living longer/not dying quickly enough when sick/disabled.Of course,this is going into reverse for some inexplicable bloody obvious reason.

Definately more limited lives.The pressure outwith on systems is clear to see by such neglect,the evidence of less likely life extension without,is ample.

High Court finds,again,Government guilty of discrimination and breaking the law against disabled people in implementing their misanthropy.

As ever,the "vulnerable" at the vanguard.

Evil,end of.

Transitional protection of course is still a cut.

yes, government know what they're doing

If you really are "protecting the vulnerable",you wouldn't have to say it.

good observation

It's not small state government, Tory leadership, they love controlling
Their state is huge

Small state where it suits them, ie when it affects "other people".

Socialism is very popular when it comes to expensive flood protection measures to safeguard privately owned houses.

_________________
“Of all the trees we could've hit, we had to get one that hits back.”

And all those European Agencies are very popular when it appears we would lose the masses of advantages with a hard brexit --

/12-brexit-cherries-the-uk-wants-to-pick/

https://www.politico.eu/article/12-brex ... s-to-pick/

@frog

Indeed,as well as similar "complexities" or attending to actual circumstances,views differ,under the guise of simplification.Frustrating at the time that the "agree in principle"took hold,now constrained by past utterations etc.As,I boringly state complexity, evidential introduced attending to situations,differing societal changes,practices,intentions,particular away from institutions and facillitating self care/care in own home hard fought for isn't a problem but bloody essential.

"Socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor".

From the memorandum of understanding about legislative consent motions (the issue causing a problem about devolved powers at the moment).



So the UK government's case is that (1) we have authority to proceed where we want to and (2) these are not normal circumstances and therefore (3) we can proceed as we want to.

_________________
is this as grown-up as we ever get?

This isn't made clear on the UK's Parliamentary website
I don't like this at all

'she's not a nice old lady, Tim...she's a gangster...'

https://youtu.be/8GEpUphfykc

she could gift every UK citizen a house and annuity and still have plenty stashed in her handbag

Her resources don't get to hide behind 'political neutrality' when UK citizens are burned or turfed out of their homes, visiting foodbanks and going without healthcare

"It's a waste of time if you know what they mean
Try shaking your box in front of the Queen
'Cause her purse is fat and bursting at the seams
It's a waste of time if you know what they mean"

_________________
is this as grown-up as we ever get?

Apropos of not much in particular, apparently one of the PMs that Brenda got on best with back in the day was Harold Wilson.

'all you Labour MPs fall in love with the Queen'