FlyTheNest

HindleA wrote: Pto

Don't mind if I do.

Rachel Bland currently the story on the BBC News, how incredibly sad

I wish to name our house in defiance against those who propagandise that we were unfair being here,working on a suitable appellation (?).It deserves far more than a mere number,in any case.What is the process?

Avoiding swear words,a struggle,maybe anagrammatical.

Indeed very sad.One of the many reasons as to why I can't "believe".

Truth is, we really don't know how long we have got. Less than a year ago, my dad seemed absolutely fine.

https://amp.theguardian.com/education/2 ... ssion=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Special needs funding at crisis point, say school leaders
Headteachers say lack of funds means code of practice is an empty promise


Segregation increasing.

"Curtsyton"

https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/amp/entr ... ssion=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Torycunts

"We don't comment on individual cases unless useful for propaganda purposes via right wing rags alerting to fraud cases where there is an evens chance they were actually entitled to more but we leave that bit out "a DWPbot stated.

Hmmm. Jonathan Freedland may have libeled Corbyn.

https://amp.theguardian.com/society/201 ... ssion=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Universal credit could be sunk by next stage of rollout, say experts
Calls for further delays to fix flaws before million working families move on to benefit

"Universal credit is a flexible and responsive benefit, providing claimants with personal support and helping to get them into work faster and stay in work longer."

Which is bollox and indeed irrelevant/inapplicable in any case beyond the minority of claimants a rogue discarded DWPtruthbot stated.

Still want it to "work",stymied/restricted by supporting it.At the bare minimum the unexpected to work,should be no where near it.I thought that much was obvious.Trouble is,and this was always part of the thinking ,it reaches a point whereby at least equal disaster/pernicious either way.

The old system responded ok with varying weekly income sending two weeks at a time,decisions based on speed are only an improvement if actually correct,easily remedied if not,the whole caboodle not removed universally and consequences thereof.

Begs the question,have the DWP bods no actual shame or basic self respect to repeat that line,knowing the irrelevancy.

Because they aren't thick,perhaps more they think others are.

]And what to say about the head bod's there was hardship before UC ,(hardly the only reform undertaken)we have to wait and see the extent of hardship specific to UC before making a comparison.What percentage of lives fucked up unnecessarily is deemed an improvement,a price worth paying for the twelve people and a dog called Butch that got a job twenty seconds before they would have got anyway seven years ago?

I had thought Butch,the dog in Tom and Jerry had retired,but now doing voice overs.Changed his name from Spike,of course.

Fucking Tories making seventy year old dogs work,under they aren't human excuse.

Hey,if the DWP can provide illustrations by making people up,at least mine existed cartoon wise.

"That's my Boy!!"