FlyTheNest

A haven
It is currently Tue 23 Apr, 2019 2:03 am

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Welcome to FTN. New posters are welcome to join the conversation. You can follow us on Twitter @FlythenestHaven You are responsible for the content you post. This is a public forum. Treat it as if you are speaking in a crowded room. Site admin and Moderators are volunteers who will respond as quickly as they are able to when made aware of any complaints. Please do not post copyrighted material without the original authors permission.



Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 4:27 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
Morning

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radi ... ve-special

BBC to reboot Tomorrow's World for one-off live special


Last edited by HindleA on Sat 03 Nov, 2018 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 4:37 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://edition-m.cnn.com/2018/11/02/po ... index.html?


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/us- ... tions-2018

Re mid-term elections


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 5:37 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
Disorientated as to morning/evening as to preparing to avoid work on my day off,darkness now being common to both.Doesn't help morning/lunch etc applied despite twelve hours difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 7:23 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/live/ ... -more-live


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 7:26 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
"very inexperienced All Black side"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 7:26 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:22 pm
Posts: 3577
Location: Wombwell, United Kingdom
Has thanked: 956 times
Been thanked: 6552 times
HindleA wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/live/2018/nov/03/sportwatch-all-blacks-v-japan-a-league-wnbl-and-more-live

I managed to get up for the second half.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 7:27 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:22 pm
Posts: 3577
Location: Wombwell, United Kingdom
Has thanked: 956 times
Been thanked: 6552 times
HindleA wrote:
"very inexperienced All Black side"

8 new caps in the side. Still scary good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 8:59 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/next ... d-for-2019

Next round of stopping people voting pilots announced


Last edited by HindleA on Sat 03 Nov, 2018 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 9:03 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/jame ... more-homes

James Brokenshire: building better and beautiful will deliver more homes
This announcement comes as a month long series of events coordinated by think tank Policy Exchange

Sir Roger Scrotum has been appointed to Chair the commission,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 9:05 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
(He changed his name appropriately a la PE)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 9:10 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
Constance has done the Times Crossword in record time,though some entries not fully compliant with the English language and all four letters are swear words but pretty good for a cat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 9:14 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultat ... ay#history


Consultation outcome

Parental bereavement leave and pay


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 9:16 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... ns#history

School capital funding allocations
(Updated to take account of Budget)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 9:20 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
-


Attachments:
4808.jpg
4808.jpg [ 29.96 KiB | Viewed 1393 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 9:51 am 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 1:40 pm
Posts: 5636
Has thanked: 10983 times
Been thanked: 13374 times
Morning all.

I see by @PaulfromYorkshire's last response to my tax ramblings yesterday I probably wasn't communicating my point very well.

I just wanted to make absolutely clear that I do support John McDonnell's proposals to tax wealth. I would probably favour a land value tax of some type, as the UK has a particular problem with land distribution. And I totally agree with the need to reverse the recent corporation tax cuts.

The ultimate aim for me, however, would be to reduce inequality, for the very wealthy to be much less wealthy, which would be a natural consequence of tackling the imbalance in our economy that has led to the over-inflation of paper assets. What I'm basically saying is that in my ideal world no one would have vast wealth to tax, I would use wealth taxes to discourage wealth hoarding and if I achieved my aim I wouldn't therefore be able to rely on that tax to fund stuff. If you base your tax system on taxing wealth and the very wealthy you are banking on having continued very wealthy people in your society and I find that a pessimistic prospect.

The only reason I'm still talking about this, though, is because I find it an interesting conversation. I disagree with McDonnell on this point but a lot of people don't and it's not a big issue for me. I can see how saying you won't reverse the cuts may appeal to some people. It's just that I can also see how it might appeal less to those on lower incomes who will be paying for this cut through continued benefit cuts and freezes for some years to come. Trying to appeal to all voters is certainly a tricky balancing act.

_________________
“Find a nice, self sufficient hilltop, and fortify it.” - The Kraken Wakes


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 9:53 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/c ... mes-plans/

Concerns over industry’s repeated objections to councils’ accessible homes plans


"No "crips" here".Various pincer movements to segregate of course,as ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 10:30 am 
Offline
First Secretary of State

Joined: Thu 28 Aug, 2014 9:51 am
Posts: 3011
Has thanked: 6071 times
Been thanked: 6658 times
Willow904 wrote:
those on lower incomes who will be paying for this cut through continued benefit cuts and freezes for some years to come.

I struggle with this bit. The link between benefit cuts and tax cuts for the better-off is that the tories are bastards, that's all.

It makes just as much sense to say, benefits are being cut so that there's extra money for the NHS, or local govt/police cuts/freezes are funding tax cuts for the rich.

Tories gonna tory.

_________________
One world, like it or not - John Martyn


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 10:36 am 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 1:40 pm
Posts: 5636
Has thanked: 10983 times
Been thanked: 13374 times
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... greed-soon

Quote:
UK and Ireland signal Irish border Brexit deal could be agreed soon
Senior politicians say recent progress in talks could resolve the backstop imbroglio


If it was anyone but May this might look hopeful but the chances of her getting anything agreeable to the EU past the ERG remains pretty slim.

Oh and "imbroglio" ?!

When was the last time that term was applied to a political situation? Edward VIII's abdication? :D

_________________
“Find a nice, self sufficient hilltop, and fortify it.” - The Kraken Wakes


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 10:42 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 11:18 am
Posts: 11669
Has thanked: 22850 times
Been thanked: 19964 times
Natalie Imbroglio? (Sorry.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 11:08 am 
Online
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 8:26 pm
Posts: 9000
Has thanked: 900 times
Been thanked: 18443 times
PorFavor wrote:
Natalie Imbroglio? (Sorry.)


Famous (well, slightly) at one time for not going out with Liam Fox, you may recall.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 11:14 am 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 1:40 pm
Posts: 5636
Has thanked: 10983 times
Been thanked: 13374 times
gilsey wrote:
Willow904 wrote:
those on lower incomes who will be paying for this cut through continued benefit cuts and freezes for some years to come.

I struggle with this bit. The link between benefit cuts and tax cuts for the better-off is that the tories are bastards, that's all.

It makes just as much sense to say, benefits are being cut so that there's extra money for the NHS, or local govt/police cuts/freezes are funding tax cuts for the rich.

Tories gonna tory.


Yes, it's the Tories being Tories. It was a shit budget. So why pick bits out and say you won't oppose them, why give the Tories the benefit of a cheap win by making it appear they may have got something right? Reducing tax on higher earners negates the "austerity" argument of needing to cut benefits to reduce the deficit. It exposes the ugly truth that reducing benefits is ideological not financial. This is what Corbyn took from the budget, this is what he tried to bring out in PMQs and I just find myself more in tune with his response to this than McDonnell. I guess I still really want people to open their eyes to the falsity of austerity, that there was no real austerity to bring to an end, there never was, just an ideological shrinking of the state and reversal of the redistribution of wealth that happened under Labour. That if reducing the deficit was as important as the Tories (and Libdems!) said it was, tax cuts for anyone would be completely out of the question until the structural deficit had been eliminated.

_________________
“Find a nice, self sufficient hilltop, and fortify it.” - The Kraken Wakes


Last edited by Willow904 on Sat 03 Nov, 2018 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 11:16 am 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 1:40 pm
Posts: 5636
Has thanked: 10983 times
Been thanked: 13374 times
AnatolyKasparov wrote:
PorFavor wrote:
Natalie Imbroglio? (Sorry.)


Famous (well, slightly) at one time for not going out with Liam Fox, you may recall.


?!!!

_________________
“Find a nice, self sufficient hilltop, and fortify it.” - The Kraken Wakes


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 11:56 am 
Online
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 8:26 pm
Posts: 9000
Has thanked: 900 times
Been thanked: 18443 times
There was a silly rumour going round to that effect about a decade ago. Google will no doubt tell you more if you are genuinely interested :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 12:28 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... ortage-nhs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 1:03 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 11:18 am
Posts: 11669
Has thanked: 22850 times
Been thanked: 19964 times
Quote:
BBC criticised over Arron Banks slot on Andrew Marr show

Lawyers and MPs condemn plan to interview Brexiter under criminal investigation

The BBC’s decision provoked widespread condemnation from politicians, lawyers and activists.

Andrew Adonis, a leading remain campaigner, said in a letter to the BBC that Banks’s expected appearance was the result of “a very serious editorial misjudgment, influenced by a culture of accommodation to extreme Brexiteers now deeply embedded within the BBC”.

Caroline Lucas MP and Molly Scott Cato MEP, both Green party politicians, wrote an open letter criticising the decision to allow the “showman” to “spread misinformation at our expense”. (Guardian)


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/nov/03/bbc-criticised-over-arron-banks-slot-on-andrew-marr-show


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 1:09 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4 ... 58E7PHqobF

Young and new voters surge in early voting


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 1:10 pm 
Online
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 8:26 pm
Posts: 9000
Has thanked: 900 times
Been thanked: 18443 times
As usual, the BBC appear to be doubling down and refusing to accept any criticism.

The way they have gone about alienating erstwhile supporters in the past decade is astonishing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 1:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 7093
Has thanked: 2423 times
Been thanked: 11609 times
@Willow

Thanks for the further contributions on tax. It's not a subject I have ever had great clarity on (among others before someone else points that out ;-)) but having read your pieces I wonder if one of the hardest places to go is inheritance. In other words it may be OK for very talented folk to work hard and earn quite a bit, but they can't just assume their kids will get it all. I suppose inheritance is the principle source of wealth.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 1:59 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... tudy-shows

Key welfare reform disproportionately affects ill or disabled people

" designed to motivate people into work"

As 80% are not expected to work this was always nonsense.This was exactly the same bullshit as well as propagandising as unfair McVey (more likely staff) deployed in written communication regarding transfer to interest bearing loan plus charges.You can be in work as I was.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 2:06 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
Out of work benefits does not mean you are out of work or economically inactive.Classic case of participation used against you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 2:08 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
Far better to play the sufficiently pathetic for others aggrandisement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 2:09 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 1:40 pm
Posts: 5636
Has thanked: 10983 times
Been thanked: 13374 times
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
@Willow

Thanks for the further contributions on tax. It's not a subject I have ever had great clarity on (among others before someone else points that out ;-)) but having read your pieces I wonder if one of the hardest places to go is inheritance. In other words it may be OK for very talented folk to work hard and earn quite a bit, but they can't just assume their kids will get it all. I suppose inheritance is the principle source of wealth.


Inheritance tax is always a bit of a hot potato. If you tax people too much when they pass their money on it will discourage people from saving for old age. On the other hand for the very wealthy when they pass their house and estates on to the next generation is sometimes the only opportunity to levy a tax they can't dodge. That's why I think there may be potential in some kind of land value tax as it's hard to avoid. What you don't want is situations like a parent leaving a disabled child they live with their house only for the child to have to sell the house to pay inheritance tax and end up losing their home. What you do want is a child being left a second house they don't need to live in paying some kind of tax that fairly reflects that windfall, but achieving that distinction is tricky.

_________________
“Find a nice, self sufficient hilltop, and fortify it.” - The Kraken Wakes


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 3:01 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 7093
Has thanked: 2423 times
Been thanked: 11609 times
Willow904 wrote:
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
@Willow

Thanks for the further contributions on tax. It's not a subject I have ever had great clarity on (among others before someone else points that out ;-)) but having read your pieces I wonder if one of the hardest places to go is inheritance. In other words it may be OK for very talented folk to work hard and earn quite a bit, but they can't just assume their kids will get it all. I suppose inheritance is the principle source of wealth.


Inheritance tax is always a bit of a hot potato. If you tax people too much when they pass their money on it will discourage people from saving for old age. On the other hand for the very wealthy when they pass their house and estates on to the next generation is sometimes the only opportunity to levy a tax they can't dodge. That's why I think there may be potential in some kind of land value tax as it's hard to avoid. What you don't want is situations like a parent leaving a disabled child they live with their house only for the child to have to sell the house to pay inheritance tax and end up losing their home. What you do want is a child being left a second house they don't need to live in paying some kind of tax that fairly reflects that windfall, but achieving that distinction is tricky.

Thanks and agreed.

Everything I ever read about Land Value Tax makes it sound very sensible. As you say hard to avoid. Pretty fair. And discourages land hoarding so could help with the housing problem too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 3:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 7093
Has thanked: 2423 times
Been thanked: 11609 times
How much LVT would the Royal Family pay I wonder?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 3:07 pm 
Offline
Chancellor

Joined: Sun 29 Nov, 2015 1:24 pm
Posts: 1843
Has thanked: 5139 times
Been thanked: 2537 times
Willow904 wrote:
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
@Willow
Thanks for the further contributions on tax. It's not a subject I have ever had great clarity on (among others before someone else points that out ;-)) but having read your pieces I wonder if one of the hardest places to go is inheritance. In other words it may be OK for very talented folk to work hard and earn quite a bit, but they can't just assume their kids will get it all. I suppose inheritance is the principle source of wealth.

Inheritance tax is always a bit of a hot potato. If you tax people too much when they pass their money on it will discourage people from saving for old age. On the other hand for the very wealthy when they pass their house and estates on to the next generation is sometimes the only opportunity to levy a tax they can't dodge. That's why I think there may be potential in some kind of land value tax as it's hard to avoid. What you don't want is situations like a parent leaving a disabled child they live with their house only for the child to have to sell the house to pay inheritance tax and end up losing their home. What you do want is a child being left a second house they don't need to live in paying some kind of tax that fairly reflects that windfall, but achieving that distinction is tricky.

Framing legislation on that is so difficult, when thousands of sharp lawyers /accountants are sharpening their wits for any loophole! Anyway, for fun --
Image
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Joy-Tax-Richar ... 059307517X
I haven't read it or much else on the subject, but did spend some years in 'the money exchange bizness' . MMT/Corbynomics might be a project for winter !

PS Richard Murphy's blog is fun http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 3:32 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 11 Sep, 2014 11:22 am
Posts: 16590
Has thanked: 90093 times
Been thanked: 14098 times
Good-afternoon, everyone


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 3:53 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 11 Sep, 2014 11:22 am
Posts: 16590
Has thanked: 90093 times
Been thanked: 14098 times
Many thanks for the contributions regarding taxes
I like constructive discourse
Grown-up deliberations and negotiation happen all the time
Looking at headlines and other media one could be forgiven for thinking they don't


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 4:00 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 11 Sep, 2014 11:22 am
Posts: 16590
Has thanked: 90093 times
Been thanked: 14098 times
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
How much LVT would the Royal Family pay I wonder?
I've had difficulty finding that out
I've another question. Can the UK monarch legally and successfully bequeath their wealth to anyone or any number of people?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 4:52 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://www.derbyshiretimes.co.uk/news/ ... -1-9426982


interesting to see whether my put underwear on head and resigning en masse suggestion is taken up


Last edited by HindleA on Sat 03 Nov, 2018 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 4:56 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
A very polite response given context,duplicituousness and some of the despicable characters involved.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 5:00 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
Don't usually bear a grudge but with the attempted breaching of agreement by conveniently forgetting or hoping we had on introduction of inescapeable maintenance charges for essential equipment I make an exception.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 5:02 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
Most people think many things are free that are not and the basics,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 5:03 pm 
Offline
Chancellor

Joined: Sun 29 Nov, 2015 1:24 pm
Posts: 1843
Has thanked: 5139 times
Been thanked: 2537 times
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 8:18 pm 
Offline
Chancellor

Joined: Sun 29 Nov, 2015 1:24 pm
Posts: 1843
Has thanked: 5139 times
Been thanked: 2537 times
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lexAguA9uFA



Worth it for the spectacle of Sarah Huckabee Saunders gobbledygook explanation that Donald Trump was the real victim of the Pittsburgh shootings (50secs in) .
There follows the allusions to a 'Global Elite' , shouts of "Soros lock him up" , and of course Soros is financing the Refugee Caravan . And more ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 8:48 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... ut-of-town


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 8:50 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/ ... -two-years


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 10:43 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 23833
Has thanked: 17914 times
Been thanked: 33513 times
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... -on-wheels


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 03 Nov, 2018 10:54 pm 
Offline
Speaker of the House

Joined: Wed 27 Aug, 2014 8:15 pm
Posts: 2189
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 4360 times
One of the issues about property and inheritance tax, along with the side issue of funding social care in old age, is that for the vast majority of people the vast majority of 'equity' wealth that exists in property is there because of the behaviour of the housing market. Yes, they've invested deposits and paid mortgages (and upkeep) but the people who have rented have paid fees and rents and costs of repairs and improvements (either directly or within raised rents) just the same and they don't gain any equity.

It all means that although anti-campaigners moan about 'double-grabs' by the state, in fact most of the wealth in property has never been subject to taxation, because it only exists because the property market in the UK is insane and never stops long-term rising, even given the occasional slump (which might even be appropriately called - usually a horrible word in these circumstance - a correction).

_________________
... and if I die clutching your photograph / don't call me boring, it's just 'cause I like you...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 04 Nov, 2018 9:35 am 
Offline
Chancellor

Joined: Sun 29 Nov, 2015 1:24 pm
Posts: 1843
Has thanked: 5139 times
Been thanked: 2537 times
I'm looking forward to the reports from the Arron Banks Show this morning

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 15971.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 04 Nov, 2018 10:46 am 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 1:40 pm
Posts: 5636
Has thanked: 10983 times
Been thanked: 13374 times
Well, Andrew Marr has actually caught Banks out in a significant lie. However much Banks leads him round in circles, we've established that Banks told the DCMS committee that Rock Services is just a shell company and the £8m donated/loaned to a Brexit campaign via Rock Services came from another of his UK businesses but when Marr asks which business he can't say and eventually ends up saying the money came from Rock Services itself, which the FCA will know isn't true, even if Marr viewers don't. So not an entire success for Banks.

I'm off to check what Carole Cadwalladr made of it all in Twitter.

_________________
“Find a nice, self sufficient hilltop, and fortify it.” - The Kraken Wakes


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Exabot [Bot] and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group