Page 1 of 3

Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 7:02 am
by refitman
Morning all.

Re: Tuesaday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 7:24 am
by PorFavor
Good morfternoon.

Re: Tuesaday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 7:27 am
by PorFavor
@refitman

So it's official, then - the "refitmanian" calendar?

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 7:35 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
Choose a day :-)

Re: Tuesaday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 7:35 am
by refitman
PorFavor wrote:@refitman

So it's official, then - the "refitmanian" calendar?
That's my browser saving the text and me being half asleep.

Re: Tuesaday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 7:57 am
by PorFavor
refitman wrote:
PorFavor wrote:@refitman

So it's official, then - the "refitmanian" calendar?
That's my browser saving the text and me being half asleep.
That's what the Khmer Rouge said.

Edited - brain still scrambled. Even now, I'm not sure that I've got the spelling correct.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 8:12 am
by HindleA
(Rod Belfitt day)

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 8:17 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
Jon Snow
@jonsnowC4

A Lawyer contact tells me that the legal world is aware that the Attorney General said NO last night to the validity of Mrs May's 'new EU deal'...he been told to go away and find a way to say YES: A cohort of lawyers has been summoned.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 8:18 am
by adam
Just to make sure that everybody remains calm and focussed today, especially in the more contentious bits of the union
Bloody Sunday: Derry awaits decision on possible murder trial

Prosecutors are preparing to announce whether Parachute Regiment soldiers should face trial for murder

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 8:19 am
by HindleA
https://www.parliament.uk/business/comm ... hed-17-19/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Tuesaday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 8:20 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
PorFavor wrote:
refitman wrote:
PorFavor wrote:@refitman

So it's official, then - the "refitmanian" calendar?
That's my browser saving the text and me being half asleep.
That's what the Khmer Rouge said.

Edited - brain still scrambled. Even now, I'm not sure that I've got the spelling correct.
Tyrannical former SE Asian regime destroyed Greek humor (5,5).

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 8:41 am
by tinybgoat
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Jon Snow
@jonsnowC4

A Lawyer contact tells me that the legal world is aware that the Attorney General said NO last night to the validity of Mrs May's 'new EU deal'...he been told to go away and find a way to say YES: A cohort of lawyers has been summoned.
Seeing as he only seems able to speak in uppercase, maybe he could just sneakily substitute an appropriate anacronym:-
https://www.acronymattic.com/YES.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I quite like 'Your Entity Solution'.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 8:48 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
I now have an image of Geoffrey Cox walking on stage with a a gold envelope and saying the legal advice is.....

..... La La Land

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 9:53 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
Cox has Tweeted in reply to Snow

It just says "Bollocks"

I kid you not.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 10:36 am
by gilsey

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 10:44 am
by PorFavor
Geoffrey Cox, the attorney general, will give a statement to MPs, Andrea Leadsom, the leader of the Commons, has confirmed.

This will come at 12.30pm, unless there is an urgent question which would come first. (Politics Live, Guardian)

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 10:58 am
by gilsey
applying the cap to people who face significant barriers to work is having unintended consequences and causing unacceptable hardship and difficulties for many families.
'unintended consequences'

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/c ... rview.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 11:06 am
by gilsey
gilsey wrote: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/c ... rview.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That report includes a long list of every aspect of the cap and the changes that should be made, any sensible person would conclude that it should be scrapped asap.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 11:12 am
by adam
Cox's advice - risk of being stuck in backstop remains. Defeat for May today seems very likely, and on we go again.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 11:28 am
by adam
Really I suppose what should be said is 'further delay before the next 'meaningful vote' seems very likely, and on we go again.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 11:36 am
by PorFavor

Hugh O'Connell

@oconnellhugh

A DUP source says they do not see how the party can support the deal following Cox legal advice.

Game over, it would seem.

11:25 AM - Mar 12, 2019
(Politics Live, Guardian)

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 11:49 am
by citizenJA
This has been my understanding of the consequences of May's Withdrawal Agreement since its first debut

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 11:50 am
by citizenJA
Good-morning, everyone

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 12:03 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
So all the "journalists" proclaiming a May triumph last night were wrong, then??

I'm shocked!

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 12:08 pm
by adam
Perfectly decent comment from Cox - a reminder that the AG is a political appointment but can manage to be above things.
I have been a barrister for 36 years, and a senior politician for seven months. My professional reputation is far more important to me than my reputation as a politician.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 12:27 pm
by HindleA
No decent person would even contemplate a benefit cap,freeze,"spare"room penalty,sanctioning sick/disabled people etc.I think the worst was the attempted removal of DLA mobility for those in care homes/residential schools.Politicos are loathe to accept they are shits and that being absolute shits may very well be popular.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 12:37 pm
by citizenJA
citizenJA wrote:
This has been my understanding of the consequences of May's Withdrawal Agreement since its first debut
In short, if May’s deal is approved we can look forward to a politics dominated by internal squabbles within the Conservative Party, and the absence of constructive negotiations with Brussels, for perhaps the next four or more years. Much as we have seen for the past two years. This is because the WA does nothing to resolve internal Conservative conflicts, and more fundamentally conflicts inherent with Brexit itself.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 12:40 pm
by HindleA
Never understood the take from others satisfaction when it makes zero difference to me (apart from paying more for the consequences)currently and potentially reducing for yourself,beyond spite and stupidity

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 12:44 pm
by PorFavor
It seems to be a peculiarly British "thing". A form of self-defeating pigheadedness (there's a lot of it about).

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 12:45 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
Unfortunately, spite and resentment are powerful motivators.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 12:47 pm
by PorFavor
I felt that Geoffrey Cox substantially toned down his delivery style today when he delivered his legal opinion.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 12:58 pm
by HindleA
If you've got time for resentment and spite,you can't be actually that "hardworking" or at least crap at time management and judicious use of energies.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:05 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
A lot of the baby boomers (of course the "core" demographic for this sort of stuff) of course weren't "hardworking" themselves at all.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:06 pm
by citizenJA
PorFavor wrote:I felt that Geoffrey Cox substantially toned down his delivery style today when he delivered his legal opinion.
I was made uncomfortably aware I probably judge people too hastily with too little information.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:08 pm
by PaulfromYorkshire
PorFavor wrote:I felt that Geoffrey Cox substantially toned down his delivery style today when he delivered his legal opinion.
:lol:

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:09 pm
by PaulfromYorkshire
DUP will vote against May

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:10 pm
by PaulfromYorkshire
ERG also against

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:10 pm
by PaulfromYorkshire
Starmer already said Labour are against

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:10 pm
by PaulfromYorkshire
May is toast

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:11 pm
by PaulfromYorkshire
Barry Gardiner
‏@BarryGardiner
1m1 minute ago

The DUP’s @NigelDoddsDUP has just put the final nail into Theresa May’s political coffin

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:12 pm
by HindleA
As I boringly state,as a "hardworking taxpayer"I do less than I did in terms of mental/physical effort than when not and get paid for it.Not a moan about previous to be clear just a fact

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:16 pm
by PorFavor
citizenJA wrote:
PorFavor wrote:I felt that Geoffrey Cox substantially toned down his delivery style today when he delivered his legal opinion.
I was made uncomfortably aware I probably judge people too hastily with too little information.
Well, I don't think my original opinion of him has fundamentally changed. He simply turned out to have more professional (ie his legal profession) integrity than I had hoped. He's now shifted into "playing both ends against the middle" mode. Although he's still, thankfully, being fairly non-acktorely.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:22 pm
by citizenJA
HindleA wrote:If you've got time for resentment and spite,you can't be actually that "hardworking" or at least crap at time management and judicious use of energies.
They're damaged people, they're stuck somewhere with unresolved trauma creating more of it. Seriously. Good parenting and community support bring up decent people. A lot of people don't get either of them growing up. Psychological health is every bit as important as physical health. Make good therapy from trustworthy, professional people available for everyone. Nothing solves problems better than a community of individuals knowing who they are, worthwhile and valuable just as they are, knowing at their core no title, trust fund, career or other external attainment makes a person valuable. Those are people you can trust with your life.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:23 pm
by HindleA
https://www.theguardian.com/science/201 ... lings-care" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:32 pm
by citizenJA
PorFavor wrote:
citizenJA wrote:
PorFavor wrote:I felt that Geoffrey Cox substantially toned down his delivery style today when he delivered his legal opinion.
I was made uncomfortably aware I probably judge people too hastily with too little information.
Well, I don't think my original opinion of him has fundamentally changed. He simply turned out to have more professional (ie his legal profession) integrity than I had hoped. He's now shifted into "playing both ends against the middle" mode. Although he's still, thankfully, being fairly non-acktorely.
I know
I knew writing it it's not just about him. I happened to notice my thoughts and feelings and thought it good to mention. People decide to vote for or against someone or something (or not vote at all) on bits of information.

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:32 pm
by HindleA
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... -take-toll" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:37 pm
by adam
Vote being pulled in 3. 2.. 1...

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:38 pm
by PaulfromYorkshire
PorFavor wrote:
citizenJA wrote:
PorFavor wrote:I felt that Geoffrey Cox substantially toned down his delivery style today when he delivered his legal opinion.
I was made uncomfortably aware I probably judge people too hastily with too little information.
Well, I don't think my original opinion of him has fundamentally changed. He simply turned out to have more professional (ie his legal profession) integrity than I had hoped. He's now shifted into "playing both ends against the middle" mode. Although he's still, thankfully, being fairly non-acktorely.
Some more cynical folk on Twitter pointing out that Cox earns a very great deal more money as a lawyer than he does as an MP. Which reputation does he care more about?

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:40 pm
by citizenJA
AnatolyKasparov wrote:A lot of the baby boomers (of course the "core" demographic for this sort of stuff) of course weren't "hardworking" themselves at all.
House price inflation and other unwholesome macroeconomic constructs
Fossil-fuel based civilisation built up over decades
People use tools available
Good leadership and supportive teammates are essential

Re: Tuesday 12th March 2019

Posted: Tue 12 Mar, 2019 1:42 pm
by PaulfromYorkshire
In one final throw of the dice, the establishment have deployed their ultimate weapon to make sure Corbyn never becomes PM ;-)
(((Dan Hodges)))
‏@DPJHodges

For the first time I genuinely think we might be heading for a general election. And I also think an election heald amidst this chaos could end up with Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister. Incredible given everything that’s happened over the past few months.