Page 1 of 2

Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 6:29 am
by HindleA
Morning.
Thought for the day.


"Go to Cambridge and you might end up like Allison Pearsion-scary"

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 6:45 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
LOL

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 6:58 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
@Adam

Thanks for the reply last night.

My guess is that Johnson will think he's taken us out, because Article 50 hasn't been extended, but that the legality of that will be in doubt, so that he is in contempt of Parliament and perhaps even of the Supreme Court.

Anyway Supreme Court to look forward to today.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 8:19 am
by adam
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:@Adam

Thanks for the reply last night.

My guess is that Johnson will think he's taken us out, because Article 50 hasn't been extended, but that the legality of that will be in doubt, so that he is in contempt of Parliament and perhaps even of the Supreme Court.

Anyway Supreme Court to look forward to today.
I suspect that whilst they would be on the look out for an available fudge, this is the kind of thing where the rest of the EU have consistently said 'we don't get involved in member states' decision making'. And if the Benn Act is going to have an effect it won't be at the last second - the idea of it is to make sure things are resolved in advance. Of course we can only mandate ourselves - in a conspiracist kind of way, I imagine part of Johnson's schtick at the moment is trying to make sure that at least one other EU state will say 'why do we want to extend anyway?'

Given the way it's been trailed and analysed I look forward to hearing the SC confirm the Government's right to do as it will this morning.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 8:48 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
But perhaps with a caveat Adam.

I hope so anyway.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:04 am
by citizenJA
Good morning, everyone.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:32 am
by PorFavor
Good morfternoon.

Problem with the sound at the Supreme Court.

Ah - it's been sorted out.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:35 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
It is justiciable.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:38 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
A decision to prorogue will be unlawful if the effect is preventing without reasonable cause the working of Parliament.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:39 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
No need to consider whether Johnson broke the law.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:40 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
Distinguishing between prorogation and recess.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:40 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
The Government have surely lost.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:42 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
Bound to conclude that the decision was unlawful because prevented ability of Parliament to carry out constitutional function without reasonable justification.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:44 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
Parliament has not been prorogued.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:44 am
by PorFavor
Over to the Speaker . . .

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:44 am
by PorFavor
Or not?

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:45 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
Well well.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:46 am
by gilsey
Well.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:46 am
by PorFavor
Another rubbing out in my diary (State Opening of Parliament).

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:47 am
by RogerOThornhill
From AS

Code: Select all

Hale says prorogation 'unlawful, void and of no effect'
Hale says prorogation is not a proceeding in parliament.

Although it takes place in parliament, it is not their decision. It is something that has been imposed on them from outside.

The PM’s advice to Her Majest was “unlawful, void and of no effect”.

That means the order in council was also “unlawful, void and of no effect”.

That means the prorogation had no effect. She says it is as if the royal commission had no effect.

Parliament has not been prorogued, she says.

She says it is for the Speaker to decide what happens next.
S/be Speakers (pl.)

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:47 am
by adam
Unanimous decision too.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:51 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
The result could be Tom Watson having to walk out of his own speech.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:53 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
Dawn Foster
@DawnHFoster
·
42s
Can’t believe the Queen’s going to jail

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:53 am
by RogerOThornhill
David Allen Green

@davidallengreen
4m4 minutes ago
More
In all seriousness, the prime minister should resign now

That was as devastating a judgment as could be

And unanimous
:clap:

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:53 am
by PorFavor
Be a laugh if the Commons prevents the Conservatives from going into recess for their Conference!

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:56 am
by gilsey
Thanks to the Supreme Court, not least for giving the liberal centrists something else to talk about.

I think of myself as the most ultra of remainers and I have no problem with Labour's position at all.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:57 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
PorFavor wrote:Be a laugh if the Commons prevents the Conservatives from going into recess for their Conference!
I'm fully expecting Jezza to hop on the next train from Brighton and ask Bercow if he can give his speech in Parliament instead.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:58 am
by gilsey
Bercow will consult party leaders asap.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:58 am
by PorFavor
Anna Soubry muscling in and trying to catch some of the limelight (Sky TV).

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 10:58 am
by adam
The express comments are restrained and accepting of the rule of law as you would expect.
Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 10.56.54.png
Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 10.56.54.png (75.83 KiB) Viewed 7943 times

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:02 am
by PorFavor
Jeremy Corbyn is currently addressing the Labour Party Conference as a result of the verdict.



Edited - typo

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:02 am
by RogerOThornhill
"We want to take back control!"

*stuff happens*

"No! Not like that!"

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:03 am
by citizenJA
gilsey wrote:Thanks to the Supreme Court, not least for giving the liberal centrists something else to talk about.

I think of myself as the most ultra of remainers and I have no problem with Labour's position at all.
I agree with you

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:07 am
by citizenJA
PorFavor wrote:Be a laugh if the Commons prevents the Conservatives from going into recess for their Conference!
Yep. The Tory party are subservient to Parliament.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:08 am
by PorFavor
adam wrote:The express comments are restrained and accepting of the rule of law as you would expect.
Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 10.56.54.png
Surely some of those comments and\or the Express are breaking some sort of law.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:14 am
by gilsey
Thomas Cogley
@JohnnyPixels
It's only Tuesday and already a second group of people have had their holidays cut short

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:18 am
by AnatolyKasparov
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:The result could be Tom Watson having to walk out of his own speech.
Well, he's going to have to grab the headlines somehow.....

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:28 am
by adam
From the conclusion to the judgement
It follows that Parliament has not been prorogued and that this court should make declarations to that effect. We have been told by counsel for the Prime Minister that he will “take all necessary steps to comply with the terms of any declaration made by the court” and we expect him to do so. However, it appears to us that, as Parliament is not prorogued, it is for Parliament to decide what to do next. There is no need for Parliament to be recalled under the Meeting of Parliament Act 1797. Nor has Parliament voted to adjourn or go into recess. Unless there is some Parliamentary rule to the contrary of which we are unaware, the Speaker of the House of Commons and the Lord Speaker can take immediate steps to enable each House to meet as soon as possible to decide upon a way forward. That would, of course, be a proceeding in Parliament which could not be called in question in this or any other court.
In other words - Johnson said 'We will pay attention and decide what to do next'. The court says 'It's not up to you'.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:34 am
by RogerOThornhill
Alex Andreou

Verified account

@sturdyAlex
9m9 minutes ago
More
Andrew Bridgen losing his mind on BBC. Describes the decision as "disgusting". Apparently, "Parliament is holding our democracy to ransom."

Take a moment to digest that sentence.
:lol:

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:37 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
Dawn Foster

Look, if you don’t send the Queen to prison, you are just going to get millions of teenagers copying her, getting drunk and proroguing parliament.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:47 am
by AnatolyKasparov
Watson fed Peston that line yesterday about communist China, didn't he?

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:50 am
by PorFavor
Guy Verhofstadt

@guyverhofstadt

At least one big relief in the Brexit saga: the rule of law in the UK is alive & kicking. Parliaments should never be silenced in a real democracy.

I never want to hear Boris Johnson or any other Brexiteer say again that the European Union is undemocratic.
5,722
11:21 AM - Sep 24, 2019 (Politics Live, Guardian- my emphasis)

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:54 am
by adam
If the session isn't being prorogued, then Johnson can't bring a bill approving May's deal back to Parliament this side of a 'normal' prorogation and a new Queen's Speech.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 11:56 am
by Willow904
11-0

Both surprising and not. The Supreme Court were given little choice, imo. They had to rule it justiciable else this instance could be used as a precedent to justify ever increasing liberties by the executive and having ruled it justiciable it really would have been quite remarkable if they then disagreed with the Scottish Court that this prorogation was unlawful.

The most interesting bit is the SC directions of what should happen next as although it is completely logical and obvious I have to confess I didn't anticipate this and I'm not sure No. 10 did either. I've heard two calls for Johnson's resignation since turning on the tv just 10 minutes ago. Something else I'm not sure No. 10 anticipated, but that unanimous ruling is a very strong indictment of his behaviour and I really can't see how he can continue.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 12:00 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
Willow904 wrote:but that unanimous ruling is a very strong indictment of his behaviour and I really can't see how he can continue.
I expect he will, though.

Expect his captive press to be more deranged than ever before in tonight's editions.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 12:01 pm
by PorFavor
Government Whips office telling Conservative MPs not to comment on the ruling.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 12:05 pm
by PorFavor
Boris Johnson is apparently taking time to consider his next lie.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 12:25 pm
by PaulfromYorkshire
Corbyn will give speech this afternoon. Parliament to reopen tomorrow.

#PMQs anyone?

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 12:26 pm
by adam
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Corbyn will give speech this afternoon. Parliament to reopen tomorrow.

#PMQs anyone?
Apparently not - not enough notice, but no problem with urgent questions and SO24 applications.

Re: Tuesday 24th September 2019

Posted: Tue 24 Sep, 2019 12:29 pm
by RogerOThornhill
I somehow doubt that Dominic Cummings will be in No 10 long after the PM returns.

Can't imagine that JRM will be around long either - it's as much his failure.