Page 1 of 2

Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 6:41 am
by refitman
Morning all.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 7:12 am
by citizenJA
Good morning, everyone.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 9:28 am
by HindleA
The whole exchange concerning the Hastings and Rye hustings and paying some people with a learning disability less than others to work on the basis they don't know the concept of money is worth a look on Facebook ,particularly the response of the Green candidate in citing the view /positing the.m.w/wage level/health and safety etc is a barrier.In essence ,have we the right to project/deem exploitation if the person themselves is o.k with it and/or "protecting"denies others right to participate/say they are wrong.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 9:36 am
by PorFavor
Good morfternoon.

Thanks to Sky'sGoneOut for the Question Time report. And thanks to both him and the lasagne larcenist for all the rest of it.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 9:38 am
by PorFavor
"Both him" or "both he"?

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 9:40 am
by HindleA
To be clear ,the Tory view is the appropriation of the right to work ,thoroughly skewed,but equally projecting our view that we wouldn't do it -I have in mind a more general subject to tasks undertaken-can and often is,a sneering look down/devaluing/judgement of that task.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 9:51 am
by RogerOThornhill
Morning all. And once again I am shocked etc. Happens a lot these day...
Alex Wickham

Verified account

@alexwickham
Follow Follow @alexwickham
More
Johnson confirms he is rejecting Neil interview

Senior Con source: “The public are fed up with interviews that are all about the interviewer and endless interruptions. The format is tired and broken and needs to change if it is to start engaging and informing the public again.”

9:26 AM - 6 Dec 2019
And my favourite reply so far...
junius


@AkesterGeorge
Follow Follow @AkesterGeorge
More
Replying to @alexwickham
The BBC have shot themselves in the foot, by attacking anyone who is not on board with their Leftist agenda.

9:31 AM - 6 Dec 2019
:lol:

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 9:55 am
by HindleA
Not the same but not dissimilar to the "burden/exploitation "of carers,same as JSA-if you are going along that track of thinking is hardly(especially given the exact opposite circumstances)a ringing endorsement nor indeed "pay the m.w"-given the skills and tasks involved variety ,not helpful of course in the false portrayal of what may be involved.It wasn't a burden,if you are going to really value look beyond such mis-equivalences IMHO.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 9:56 am
by RogerOThornhill
“The public are fed up with" is fast becoming as big a whopper as when a politician begins with "The fact is"...

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 9:59 am
by citizenJA
HindleA wrote:The whole exchange concerning the Hastings and Rye hustings and paying some people with a learning disability less than others to work on the basis they don't know the concept of money is worth a look on Facebook ,particularly the response of the Green candidate in citing the view /positing the.m.w/wage level/health and safety etc is a barrier.In essence ,have we the right to project/deem exploitation if the person themselves is o.k with it and/or "protecting"denies others right to participate/say they are wrong.
Paying someone with learning disabilities less because one can get away with it
'He said I could exploit him'
Have I understood the situation correctly?

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:08 am
by HindleA
Indeed I have ,thoroughly I was expanding to a more general level,putting in a box and denying for your own good isn't a left/right issue.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:12 am
by HindleA
Many people volunteer are they all being exploited,should we deny,subject to such categorisations

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:16 am
by citizenJA
HindleA wrote:Many people volunteer are they all being exploited,should we deny,subject to such categorisations
Not everyone volunteering are being exploited, only some

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:17 am
by HindleA
You can only participate subject to our view,yours' are irrelevant isn't an act of valuing.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:17 am
by citizenJA
Most people don't have resources enough to give their time and labour away for free
They may wish they could volunteer but can't afford to do it
What about them?

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:21 am
by HindleA
The Green cited a worker and their concerns and point of view.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:23 am
by citizenJA
HindleA wrote:The Green cited a worker and their concerns and point of view.
That don't pay the rent though does it

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:29 am
by citizenJA
There's so much good, necessary work needing doing, people willing and able to do it
People should be able to do that work without having to fear homelessness and hunger

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:29 am
by HindleA
If you are being specific,you ensure adequate extra costs allowances and support to self organise,including decidng for yourself,actual independent living isn't from the State's beneficence,the Greens to be fair ,get this to an extent

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:32 am
by citizenJA
The economy we all currently use wasn't my idea. It's serving the interests of very few people. Everyone else works for them.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:35 am
by HindleA
I'm not agreeing with the worker-the context can only be judged by listening/watching the hustings I'm putting his view via the Green candidate,his voice is as valid as any other.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:41 am
by HindleA
Sorry I misread above as if I rather than you ,Cja ,understood the situation.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:50 am
by HindleA
A waffling attempt to advocate a different starting point where denial isn't the default until the necessary societal changes/not least in attitude-perhaps think in terms of incalculation that you are incapable rather than made incapable.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 10:55 am
by HindleA
On the surface valuing can exhibit elements of not.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 11:01 am
by citizenJA
HindleA wrote:Sorry I misread above as if I rather than you ,Cja ,understood the situation.
Don't worry about it. Ask me for more information or post more yourself. I trust you.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 11:11 am
by HindleA
Large scale deinstitutionalism is a recent occurence,the institutionalised attitude largely remains

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 11:14 am
by RogerOThornhill
Tory ministers back candidates accused of Islamophobia

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... lamophobia
In constituency visits that appear to contradict Boris Johnson’s repeated claim that the party has a “zero tolerance” stance on the issue, Sajid Javid, Matt Hancock, Andrea Leadsom and Thérèse Coffey have thrown their weight behind the accused candidates – all of whom are fighting in key marginal battlegrounds.

Incidents include one candidate who argued that Muslims have divided loyalties, as well as blaming immigrants for bringing HIV to Britain, and another who retweeted posts from former English Defence League leader Tommy Robinson.
That reminds me of something else but I can't quite put my finger on what right now. I;m sure it'll come to me at some point...

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 11:21 am
by HindleA
A bit worried by RoT's signature,given the closure of libraries.There appears to be only two left.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 11:31 am
by HindleA
I prefer purloiner,but in the interests of alliteration(or partial?)

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 11:38 am
by PorFavor
Pasta purloiner?

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 11:45 am
by RogerOThornhill
I don't often praise Tories but Robert Jenrick deserves some for putting a hold on plans to redevelop Whitechapel Bell Foundry into a 'boutique hotel'*

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


* which I think is rooms plus a reception desk and nothing else. There's one in Oxford that I used a year or so back...but it did give me the opportunity of finding the Turl Street Kitchen whose breakfasts were yummy - an ideal way to start a day.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 11:56 am
by PorFavor
A group of mental health professionals led by a trio of pre-eminent psychiatrists is urging the House Judiciary Committee to consider Donald Trump’s “dangerous” mental state arising from his “brittle sense of self-worth” as part of its inquiry into whether to approve articles of impeachment against him.

“We are speaking out at this time because we are convinced that, as the time of possible impeachment approaches, Donald Trump has the real potential to become ever more dangerous, a threat to the safety of our nation,” said Yale Medical School Professor Dr Bandy Lee, George Washington University Professor Dr John Zinner, and former CIA profiler Dr Jerrold Post in a statement which will be sent to House Judiciary Committee members on Thursday. (Independent)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 32386.html

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 11:59 am
by PaulfromYorkshire
Did he say "talent" or "colour"?

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 12:01 pm
by PorFavor
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Did he say "talent" or "colour"?
I can't find a clip. But they're not very similar sounding words.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 12:08 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
Labour gain in the final council byelection before the GE.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 12:34 pm
by Willow904
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Did he say "talent" or "colour"?
Sounded like "covfefe" to me. Or possibly a cough.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 12:37 pm
by RogerOThornhill
This really is the weirdest election I've ever known...
Jim Pickard

Verified account

@PickardJE
2h2 hours ago
More
Breaking:

former Tory prime minister is refusing to back the Tories:

"Sir John Major will today urge voters to back rebel candidates running against Boris Johnson’s Conservatives in next week's general election."
Quite puts the Joyce Ryan and John Mann's of this world who are urging people to vote Tory into sharp context...

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 12:45 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
Interesting to see how much media prominence he gets in comparison?

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 12:52 pm
by HindleA
An "anybody but my party"Party may hold the balance of power.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 12:59 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
RogerOThornhill wrote:Morning all. And once again I am shocked etc. Happens a lot these day...
Alex Wickham

Verified account

@alexwickham
Follow Follow @alexwickham
More
Johnson confirms he is rejecting Neil interview

Senior Con source: “The public are fed up with interviews that are all about the interviewer and endless interruptions. The format is tired and broken and needs to change if it is to start engaging and informing the public again.”

9:26 AM - 6 Dec 2019
Rob Burley - RESIGN.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 1:02 pm
by citizenJA
PorFavor wrote:
A group of mental health professionals led by a trio of pre-eminent psychiatrists is urging the House Judiciary Committee to consider Donald Trump’s “dangerous” mental state arising from his “brittle sense of self-worth” as part of its inquiry into whether to approve articles of impeachment against him.

“We are speaking out at this time because we are convinced that, as the time of possible impeachment approaches, Donald Trump has the real potential to become ever more dangerous, a threat to the safety of our nation,” said Yale Medical School Professor Dr Bandy Lee, George Washington University Professor Dr John Zinner, and former CIA profiler Dr Jerrold Post in a statement which will be sent to House Judiciary Committee members on Thursday. (Independent)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 32386.html
I was hoping someone would say something.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 1:13 pm
by HindleA
(repeat)

https://makingrightsmakesense.wordpress ... ssion=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 1:15 pm
by HindleA
"malevolent benevolence’ – prejudice masquerading as kindness or which Graeme Innes recently described as the ‘soft bigotry of low expectations’ which plagues the lives of people with learning disabilities (and disabled people generally) and which underscores the widespread discrimination many encounter in all areas of our society"

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 2:16 pm
by HindleA
Having analysed the piece,I can categorically confirm that it was an utterance from a compulsive lying cowardly tosser whatever term he used.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 2:20 pm
by HindleA
Apparently,Matlock(where he visited)despite having never been Labour is a traditional Labour leave area.You start,seriously questioning your sanity on such seeming relentless misinformation.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 3:52 pm
by PorFavor
Peter Foster, the Daily Telegraph’s Europe editor, has a detailed and revealing Twitter thread on the leaked document about the impact of the PM’s Brexit deal on Northern Ireland that starts here.

Peter Foster

@pmdfoster

There is a lot of 'nothing to see here' response to leaked @hmtreasury assessment of @BorisJohnson #Brexit Northern Ireland deal to @jeremycorbyn ...but in truth there is a EVERYTHING to see.
(Politics Live, Guardian)

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 4:07 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
HindleA wrote:Apparently,Matlock(where he visited)despite having never been Labour is a traditional Labour leave area.You start,seriously questioning your sanity on such seeming relentless misinformation.
Currently a Tory/LibDem marginal at local level.

Brand then tried to wriggle out by claiming "they were actually from Wirksworth" (which does have quite a strong Labour vote)

The factory is in fact considerably nearer to Matlock than Wirksworth.

Journalists should try checking things for themselves and not just taking CCO spin lines at face value.

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 4:24 pm
by PorFavor
The lead Brexit envoy in the UK's embassy in Washington has resigned, saying she can no longer "peddle half-truths" on behalf of political leaders she does not trust, CNN has reported.

More follows…
(Independent - breaking news)

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 4:30 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
Its starting to look like quite a few chickens could come home to roost in the final week?

Re: Friday 6th December 2019

Posted: Fri 06 Dec, 2019 5:43 pm
by refitman
PTO...