Wednesday 27th May 2020
Posted: Wed 27 May, 2020 6:24 am
Morning all.
That's very good.refitman wrote:I think Boothby Graffoe sums up what's happening quite well.
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It's quite apparent that he thinks we're all a waste of space.RogerOThornhill wrote:Morning all.
This and the one underneath is probably the reason that so many Tory MPs want rid of Cummings. Why would you want someone controlling the government you serve in when he pretty much thinks all of you are useless and a waste of space?
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Really not convinced by this.citizenJA wrote:Cummings spectacle is doing what it was meant to do
The thing is, they haven't even made a decision about R, yr1 and yr6 yet. I got an e-mail from the kids academy this morning saying they have been preparing for June 1st but have been told the final decision won't be made until tomorrow, the 28th, which is rather short notice to say the least. I'd be curious to know what parents of children in those years feel about the way this is being handled and the way in which the 5 tests which were supposed to dictate when it would be safe to ease lockdown measures don't appear to apply to either teachers or them and their children. Saying further children can only return if cases are sufficiently declining raises serious questions about why any children should be returning until this is the case.The schools minister, Nick Gibb, has told MPs it is “difficult to say” whether the government’s ambition for primary schools to reopen to all pupils this summer term will be met.
He told the education select committee that the final decision on the wider reopening of primary schools before September will depend on whether transmission rates continue to decline.
The prime minister, Boris Johnson, is pushing for pupils in reception, year one and year six at English primaries to return from 1 June, to be followed soon after by other years.
West Midlands police and crime commissioner David Jamieson said officers are reporting people breaking lockdown rules and using Dominic Cummings as an excuse, amid fears Boris Johnson’s key aide’s actions are undermining the government’s public health messaging. (Politics Live, Guardian)
Yes, if this business makes their general handling of the pandemic toxic for the government - then they are in real bother.Willow904 wrote:The Cummings story isn't a distraction. It's fundamental to the whole mishandling of the coronavirus crisis, underlining what was already suspected - that the government has failed to limit the spread and impact of the virus because they failed to take a very real and potent threat to the health of the nation seriously enough.
Sunak is a creep.AnatolyKasparov wrote:If he doesn't have any for Sunak, despite their having worked together, I suppose that says something too. Though I'm not sure precisely what
I was suggesting it as a conspiracy theory sort of thing. I shouldn't have attributed cunning when it's more government failure.Willow904 wrote:The Cummings story isn't a distraction. It's fundamental to the whole mishandling of the coronavirus crisis, underlining what was already suspected - that the government has failed to limit the spread and impact of the virus because they failed to take a very real and potent threat to the health of the nation seriously enough.
Our boiler was serviced this am, Cummings wasn't mentioned by the repair man, his first comment was that it was time we got back to normal. Quite clear from the conversation that the UK excess death numbers hadn't got through to him. 'Might be a bit more' than other countries. Most of the people dying in care homes would have died anyway.AnatolyKasparov wrote:Yes, if this business makes their general handling of the pandemic toxic for the government - then they are in real bother.Willow904 wrote:The Cummings story isn't a distraction. It's fundamental to the whole mishandling of the coronavirus crisis, underlining what was already suspected - that the government has failed to limit the spread and impact of the virus because they failed to take a very real and potent threat to the health of the nation seriously enough.
I don't think they're above appropriating a PR shambles as a distraction, making the best of a bad job.citizenJA wrote:I was suggesting it as a conspiracy theory sort of thing. I shouldn't have attributed cunning when it's more government failure.Willow904 wrote:The Cummings story isn't a distraction. It's fundamental to the whole mishandling of the coronavirus crisis, underlining what was already suspected - that the government has failed to limit the spread and impact of the virus because they failed to take a very real and potent threat to the health of the nation seriously enough.
yes, please. Worst possible government for a pandemic. Madness. I hope I'm around a couple decades from now reading accounts of it while responsibly governed.AnatolyKasparov wrote:Yes, if this business makes their general handling of the pandemic toxic for the government - then they are in real bother.Willow904 wrote:The Cummings story isn't a distraction. It's fundamental to the whole mishandling of the coronavirus crisis, underlining what was already suspected - that the government has failed to limit the spread and impact of the virus because they failed to take a very real and potent threat to the health of the nation seriously enough.
gilsey wrote:---
Our boiler was serviced this am, Cummings wasn't mentioned by the repair man, his first comment was that it was time we got back to normal. Quite clear from the conversation that the UK excess death numbers hadn't got through to him. 'Might be a bit more' than other countries. Most of the people dying in care homes would have died anyway.
Made me sad, actually.
What's the PR shambles costing this government? I'm not argumentative for the sake of it. They don't care. Most UK peoples could vanish and this government would be fine with that.gilsey wrote:I don't think they're above appropriating a PR shambles as a distraction, making the best of a bad job.citizenJA wrote:I was suggesting it as a conspiracy theory sort of thing. I shouldn't have attributed cunning when it's more government failure.Willow904 wrote:The Cummings story isn't a distraction. It's fundamental to the whole mishandling of the coronavirus crisis, underlining what was already suspected - that the government has failed to limit the spread and impact of the virus because they failed to take a very real and potent threat to the health of the nation seriously enough.
He may have felt differently if it had been his mum or dad who had died prematurely, though, as quite a few Tory MPs are now discovering as they go through their constituency e-mails.gilsey wrote:Our boiler was serviced this am, Cummings wasn't mentioned by the repair man, his first comment was that it was time we got back to normal. Quite clear from the conversation that the UK excess death numbers hadn't got through to him. 'Might be a bit more' than other countries. Most of the people dying in care homes would have died anyway.AnatolyKasparov wrote:Yes, if this business makes their general handling of the pandemic toxic for the government - then they are in real bother.Willow904 wrote:The Cummings story isn't a distraction. It's fundamental to the whole mishandling of the coronavirus crisis, underlining what was already suspected - that the government has failed to limit the spread and impact of the virus because they failed to take a very real and potent threat to the health of the nation seriously enough.
Made me sad, actually.
Such people are however a minority, according to the polling (yes, I know)gilsey wrote:Our boiler was serviced this am, Cummings wasn't mentioned by the repair man, his first comment was that it was time we got back to normal. Quite clear from the conversation that the UK excess death numbers hadn't got through to him. 'Might be a bit more' than other countries. Most of the people dying in care homes would have died anyway.AnatolyKasparov wrote:Yes, if this business makes their general handling of the pandemic toxic for the government - then they are in real bother.Willow904 wrote:The Cummings story isn't a distraction. It's fundamental to the whole mishandling of the coronavirus crisis, underlining what was already suspected - that the government has failed to limit the spread and impact of the virus because they failed to take a very real and potent threat to the health of the nation seriously enough.
Made me sad, actually.
WTF?!Beth Rigby
@BethRigby
PM has just said “I’m not giving you a deadline right now. I have been forbidden from announcing any more targets”
By whom? He’s the *actual prime minister*
4:44 PM · May 27, 2020
Liz getting involved, must beWillow904 wrote:
WTF?!Beth Rigby
@BethRigby
PM has just said “I’m not giving you a deadline right now. I have been forbidden from announcing any more targets”
By whom? He’s the *actual prime minister*
4:44 PM · May 27, 2020
People with cancer, liver disease or severe asthma have been dropped from the UK government’s coronavirus shielding list by text message before their doctors have been able to speak to them.
The decision to remove people with various health conditions from the shielding programme has caused upset. The text also informed people they would no longer qualify for government food parcels.
Many who received the messages last Friday believed they were fake. But the government has since confirmed the texts are correct and are official government communications.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... lding-list" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Do it. It's your civic duty.Sky'sGoneOut wrote: And to all those unhappy brexit voters who think Cummings should be fired (more than half of them according to the polls) I think I'm going to scrawl 'I told you so' across my bare arse, take a picture, then have it psychically projected straight into your stupid fucking heads.
I'm sure he would, that's what made me sad, he didn't much care as long as it didn't directly affect him. Natural tory voter I suppose.Willow904 wrote: He may have felt differently if it had been his mum or dad who had died prematurely, though
I thought that was only when she interviewed Barry Gardiner.Pinned Tweet
Daniel Kawczynski@DKShrewsbury
I had to decline Newsnight interview last night on Mr Cummings as I find
@maitlis
to be extraordinarily aggressive,unnecessarily rude, biased & confrontational to point of intimidation. This behaviour would not be tolerated in any normal workplace so why do we accept from #BBC
8:53 PM · May 27, 2020
That's it.frog222 wrote:
" The government simply hasn’t got any clue
He went on 'I'd rather be appearing on a platform with European neo-fascists'.gilsey wrote:I thought that was only when she interviewed Barry Gardiner.Pinned Tweet
Daniel Kawczynski@DKShrewsbury
I had to decline Newsnight interview last night on Mr Cummings as I find
@maitlis
to be extraordinarily aggressive,unnecessarily rude, biased & confrontational to point of intimidation. This behaviour would not be tolerated in any normal workplace so why do we accept from #BBC
8:53 PM · May 27, 2020