Friday 26th June 2020
Posted: Fri 26 Jun, 2020 6:44 am
Morning all.
I apologise for taking the baitrefitman wrote:I've binned 'SH2'. Please don't respond in future.
It was something I felt particularly strongly about, and something I felt I should have spoken up about more in the past.refitman wrote:I've binned 'SH2'. Please don't respond in future.
That was me, I just deleted everything.GetYou wrote:It was something I felt particularly strongly about, and something I felt I should have spoken up about more in the past.refitman wrote:I've binned 'SH2'. Please don't respond in future.
But I understand how people feel about it and will refrain from doing so again should a similar situation arise.
And after noting several deleted posts which appear to be some sort of track-covering exercise, I agree with the ban.
Ha ha, fair enough. I'll take this opportunity to say thanks for all your work hererefitman wrote:That was me, I just deleted everything.
I'll message her and pass on the best wishes.AnatolyKasparov wrote:Noted that cJA has been absent for the last few days, as ever hope everything is OK.
Very good.RogerOThornhill wrote:Morning.
This is informative and pretty funny about that plane...
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Hi therecitizenJA wrote:Good afternoon, everyone.
frog222 wrote:Fishgirl23
Full list of the 331 Tory MPs who voted against weekly testing of NHS and care staff. It includes Jeremy Hunt who advocated testing on the same day and then voted against testing, in the same day. Lol!
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/polit ... care-staff" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I forget how many Tories there are, did any abstain, vote against their party ?
————————————————————-
DanFranklin --This is Johnson’s Churchill moment. They are actually fightIng on the beaches.
Opposition Motion: Testing of NHS and Social Care Staff
Division 60: held on 24 June 2020 at 19:00
198 Ayes
344 Noes
Question accordingly disagreed
AYES
NOES
NO VOTE RECORDED
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons/Division/802" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
AnatolyKasparov wrote:Hi therecitizenJA wrote:Good afternoon, everyone.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... leo-brexit'We've bought the wrong satellites': UK tech gamble baffles experts
Bid for 20% of OneWeb to replace Galileo after Brexit ‘looks like nationalism trumping industrial policy’
(Guardian)
how embarrassingPorFavor wrote:Good morfternoon.https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... leo-brexit'We've bought the wrong satellites': UK tech gamble baffles experts
Bid for 20% of OneWeb to replace Galileo after Brexit ‘looks like nationalism trumping industrial policy’
(Guardian)
Why are California's Covid-19 cases surging? Here's what we knowAs malls, museums, bars and other public spaces reopened, Governor Gavin Newsom has urged citizens to wear masks and keep their distance from one another to slow the spread of disease. “I cannot impress upon people more the importance at this critical juncture,” he said, “to take seriously this moment.”As of Thursday, the number of patients hospitalized with Covid-19 is 32% higher than it was two weeks ago, Newsom reported. The number of patients in intensive care also increased 19% over the past fortnight – more than a third of ICU beds available across the state are now occupied by coronavirus patients.In order to safely reopen, no more than 5% of everyone in a community who gets tested for Covid-19 should receive a positive result, according to the World Health Organization. California’s threshold for reopening is that no more than 8% of all tests should come back positive. While the positivity rate for the state overall hovers at a tenuous 5.1%, the rate in some southern California counties is nearly 9% or higher.
Governor Newsom said the state might have to “revert back” to tougher restrictions if the situation gets worse.
https://theconversation.com/can-people- ... -19-140531
An early modeling estimate suggested that 80% of infections could be attributed to spread from undocumented cases. Presumably the undocumented patients were asymptomatic or had only extremely mild symptoms. Though interesting, the researchers made a lot of assumptions in that model so it is hard to judge the accuracy of that prediction.
They should. But rates of seasonal flu always shoot up outside of school holidays,and not only because that's just when flu comes around - they decline during/after October half term and christmas and then bounce back. Which probably means that children are going into school when they're ill.Willow904 wrote:If you have the flu you'd have a temperature, even if you don't always have a temperature with coronavirus. What I'm basically saying is that someone sneezing and coughing with a temperature should be isolating at home anyway, regardless what they're ill with, so hopefully it's a moot (though certainly interesting) point.
My daughter is looking forward to excluding any snuffling/sneezing lycée students who do not have masks, for flu or whatever else. If CV surfaces locally again, they will be OUT ..adam wrote:They should. But rates of seasonal flu always shoot up outside of school holidays,and not only because that's just when flu comes around - they decline during/after October half term and christmas and then bounce back. Which probably means that children are going into school when they're ill.Willow904 wrote:If you have the flu you'd have a temperature, even if you don't always have a temperature with coronavirus. What I'm basically saying is that someone sneezing and coughing with a temperature should be isolating at home anyway, regardless what they're ill with, so hopefully it's a moot (though certainly interesting) point.
It is interesting (and it's something I know we've talked about before) how all of this is going to have to change schools' attitudes to 'sickness' (in the widest sense) absences.