Page 1 of 1
Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 6:35 am
by refitman
Morning all.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 9:59 am
by gilsey
Good morning.
Johnson may be plumbing new depths of incompetence at PMQs but Patel reaches new heights of hypocrisy.
Priti Patel
@pritipatel
Deeply saddened by the passing of Paulette Wilson who dedicated her last years to highlight the terrible injustices faced by the #Windrush generation.
Together we must continue on her mission to right the wrongs.
F****** hell.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 10:25 am
by RogerOThornhill
Yes, I just saw that and this reaction to it...
David Schneider
@davidschneider
·
3m
“Sad to hear about Paulette Wilson who campaigned against terrible injustices of Tory immigration policy” says Home Secretary behind terrible injustices of Tory immigration policy.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 11:45 am
by RogerOThornhill
I did wonder why Thursday was higher up the list than Friday - I blame the mods...
Change or Go?
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 11:53 am
by GetYou
James Felton
@JimMFelton
Replying to
@pritipatel
Deeply saddened by the passing of Paulette Wilson who dedicated her last years fighting my government's attempt to deport her the fuck out of the country.
Together we must continue her fight against [checks notes] me.
The brass neck of these effing arseholes.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 12:26 pm
by adam
RogerOThornhill wrote:I did wonder why Thursday was higher up the list than Friday - I blame the mods...
Ha! I clearly wasn't paying attention.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 12:52 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
RogerOThornhill wrote:Yes, I just saw that and this reaction to it...
David Schneider
@davidschneider
·
3m
“Sad to hear about Paulette Wilson who campaigned against terrible injustices of Tory immigration policy” says Home Secretary behind terrible injustices of Tory immigration policy.
Schrodinger's Patel?
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 2:28 pm
by citizenJA
gilsey wrote:---
F****** hell.
(cJA edit)
Speaking of hell, a tweet sent by the new Tory MP representing our constituency informed me Priti Patel visited yesterday.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 2:28 pm
by citizenJA
Good afternoon, everyone.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 2:34 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
citizenJA wrote:gilsey wrote:---
F****** hell.
(cJA edit)
Speaking of hell, a tweet sent by the new Tory MP representing our constituency informed me Priti Patel visited yesterday.
I'm sure you must feel honoured.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 3:14 pm
by citizenJA
GetYou wrote:James Felton
@JimMFelton
Replying to
@pritipatel
Deeply saddened by the passing of Paulette Wilson who dedicated her last years fighting my government's attempt to deport her the fuck out of the country.
Together we must continue her fight against [checks notes] me.
The brass neck of these effing arseholes.
Patel, like all Tory leadership, doesn't want anyone connecting damage they've done with its results.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 3:26 pm
by citizenJA
AnatolyKasparov wrote:citizenJA wrote:gilsey wrote:---
F****** hell.
(cJA edit)
Speaking of hell, a tweet sent by the new Tory MP representing our constituency informed me Priti Patel visited yesterday.
I'm sure you must feel honoured.
I'm having difficulty writing anything intelligible
it's all howling lamentation, profanity and prayer
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 3:33 pm
by citizenJA
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 4:19 pm
by AnatolyKasparov
Dont get so many updates about Constance now that he is gone, either.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 4:50 pm
by RogerOThornhill
PP is one of the "Oh but that happened under the last administration" types - the fact that the last administration was largely this one is irrelevant to her.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 5:13 pm
by citizenJA
AnatolyKasparov wrote:Dont get so many updates about Constance now that he is gone, either.
She insists upon full mourning, dramatically informed me she'll no longer dance. The cocoa she brought me this morning was weak and she frowned heavily at me when I brought it to her attention. It was that real scary glower of hers. She ever do that to you? I certainly didn't finish the cup. And it's still sitting there. She's weeping again.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 5:29 pm
by citizenJA
RogerOThornhill wrote:PP is one of the "Oh but that happened under the last administration" types - the fact that the last administration was largely this one is irrelevant to her.
Opposition parties must do whatever it takes breaking through Tory party gaslighting. People need to know it's Tory governments running them into the ground and that there's nothing inevitable about continued Tory leadership, better government is possible. Most important is creating a sense of solidarity between us all and ensuring we vote as one. People need to identify with that one party.
Re: Friday 24th July 2020
Posted: Fri 24 Jul, 2020 6:13 pm
by citizenJA
Face coverings are required to be worn in any shops, including food shops and supermarkets, but are not required in hospitality settings, including restaurants with table service, bars, and pubs. They are also not required in entertainment venues (such as cinemas or casinos), visitor attractions (such as heritage sites or museums), exercise and sports venues (such as gyms).
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... e-your-own" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Venue exemption from mandatory face covering isn't good public health policy; these are indoor places without special differences giving the people protection from infection. Yet people aren't having to wear masks in settings as risky as those it's mandatory wearing them. I'm especially concerned for staff of these exempt venue premises. Customers may be able to avoid them, employees aren't.
The government’s
guidance for keeping workers and customers safe during COVID-19 in restaurants, pubs, bars and takeaway services clearly advises that designated indoor seating areas for customers to eat or drink should at this time only be open for table service, where possible, alongside additional infection control measures.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... e-your-own" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(cJA bold)
Government's clear advice document is below. The measures in place aren't robust enough protecting employees or customers in these venues open and without a mandatory face mask requirement. Simply stating words
government clearly advises isn't enough ensuring people will be safe on that basis alone.
Keeping workers and customers safe during COVID-19 in restaurants, pubs, bars and takeaway services
COVID-19 secure guidance for employers, employees and the self-employed
This document has been prepared by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) with input from firms, unions, industry bodies and the devolved administrations in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, and in consultation with Public Health England (PHE) and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... 230720.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Department of Business published the guidance supposed to protect people in venues exempt from wearing masks.
Business is in charge of public health policy.
Government are clear enough there for sure.