Thursday 3rd September 2020
Posted: Thu 03 Sep, 2020 6:51 am
Morning all.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... y-exchange" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Others began to copy this model. Madsen Pirie, the founder of the Adam Smith Institute, describes in his autobiography how, using funds from 20 of the UK’s biggest companies, he helped to chart the course that Thatcher took. Every Saturday, while she was in opposition, staff from the Adam Smith Institute and the Institute of Economic Affairs sat down for lunch with Conservative party researchers, and leader writers and columnists from the Times and Telegraph, to plot out her rise to power. They “planned strategy for the week ahead”, and would “co-ordinate our activities to make us more effective collectively”. Pirie describes how he devised many of the policies that defined Thatcherism.
And elsewhere too, not least in the testimony of the Brexit campaign whistleblower Shahmir Sanni, there is evidence that these lobby groups coordinate their work, creating the impression that people in different places are spontaneously coming to the same conclusions. Several of them work from the same offices, in 55 and 57 Tufton Street, Westminster.
The lobby group that Boris Johnson’s government uses most is Policy Exchange. While it claims to be a neutral educational charity, it was founded in 2002 by the Conservative MPs Francis Maude and Archie Norman, and Nick Boles, who later also became a Tory MP. Its first chairman was Michael Gove. Its proposals and personnel have been adopted by the Conservative party ever since.
Policy Exchange has played an important role in shifting power away from rival institutions and into the prime minister’s office. For several years it has been building a case for curtailing the judiciary. It provided the ammunition for the government’s current attack on judicial review ...
Of all the things apparently on the agenda this is the least likely to fly imo, anathema to traditional shire tories.Policy Exchange’s proposals for changing the planning system, which involve a massive removal of power from local authorities, have been adopted wholesale by the government. One of the authors of this scheme, Jack Airey, has moved from the thinktank to Downing Street, as a special adviser.
She's good, isn't she.Sturgeon is asked about Tony Abbott. “If I had anything to do with that decision he wouldn’t be a trade envoy for the United Kingdom,” she says. “Tony Abbott … he’s a misogynist, he’s a sexist, he’s a climate change denier.” On Matt Hancock’s remark that he “also knows a lot about trade” (see 8.06am) Sturgeon says that “trade is not separate from the values and the reputation that a country wants to reflect internationally … having somebody with those views representing the UK probably does not help."
Yes. I wish Westminster had a capable leader.gilsey wrote:She's good, isn't she.Sturgeon is asked about Tony Abbott. “If I had anything to do with that decision he wouldn’t be a trade envoy for the United Kingdom,” she says. “Tony Abbott … he’s a misogynist, he’s a sexist, he’s a climate change denier.” On Matt Hancock’s remark that he “also knows a lot about trade” (see 8.06am) Sturgeon says that “trade is not separate from the values and the reputation that a country wants to reflect internationally … having somebody with those views representing the UK probably does not help."
It's also a little odd that we'd pick to represent the UK someone who isn't British. Presumably all our homegrown rightwing, homophobic, misogynists with a passing knowledge of trade were busy.gilsey wrote:She's good, isn't she.Sturgeon is asked about Tony Abbott. “If I had anything to do with that decision he wouldn’t be a trade envoy for the United Kingdom,” she says. “Tony Abbott … he’s a misogynist, he’s a sexist, he’s a climate change denier.” On Matt Hancock’s remark that he “also knows a lot about trade” (see 8.06am) Sturgeon says that “trade is not separate from the values and the reputation that a country wants to reflect internationally … having somebody with those views representing the UK probably does not help."
What use is this when it's not adequately deployed preventing further infection and mortality?Matt Hancock
@MattHancock
· 6h
Over the past 6 months we've built one of the biggest testing capacities in the world
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Deal or no deal, the border problems will be the same.AnatolyKasparov wrote:Still think a last minute "deal" will be cobbled together, though that is likely to be full of holes too.
GetYou wrote:The lies of Tony Abbott
[edit: the preview doesn't work for these types of links]
Given Johnson's display at yesterday's PMQ's that 'conerstone Westminster tradition' is dead !49. Labor’s red carpet for terrorists
Abbott accused the Labor Opposition of "rolling out the red carpet for terrorists" in June for simply querying whether the Government's plan to strip citizenship from suspects was constitutional.
This is one of the most malicious lies on this list for two reasons. First, it is untrue. And, second, it repudiates the cornerstone Westminster tradition of bipartisanship on security matters — which Labor is honouring, to its political detriment.
That's actually funnier than his COVID views which are just silly.The husband of Tory minister Chloe Smith has claimed that coronavirus is a "mental illness" and attended an anti-mask demonstration to protest lockdown measures.
Sandy McFadzean, who married the Norwich North MP in 2013, has previously re-tweeted posts describing the Government as "globalist puppets" and "tyrants".
I say we Nesters charter a vehicle capable of getting us safely to the FNestLair (the N is silent in this case).gilsey wrote:Hope you're all planning your No Deal stockpile, if you haven't already started on it.
U.K. Races to Fix ‘Critical Gaps’ in Brexit Border Plan
Deaths higher than 5-year average for the second week in a row, not due to CV19 & deaths occurring highest in private homes....the number of deaths registered was 5.2% above the five-year average (474 deaths higher); this is the second consecutive week that weekly deaths have been above the five-year average, however, the rise was not driven by the coronavirus (COVID-19).
...numbers of deaths in hospitals, care homes and other locations were below the five-year average...while the number of deaths in private homes continued to be higher than the five-year average (825 more deaths).
...deaths registered..138 mentioned "novel coronavirus (COVID-19)", the lowest number of deaths involving COVID-19 in the last 22 weeks...accounting for 1.4% of all deaths in England and Wales.
The number of deaths registered in the UK in the week ending 21 August 2020 was 10,967, which was 572 deaths higher than the five-year average and 390 deaths higher than [previous week] deaths registered in the UK... .
ONS
2 September 2020
Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, provisional: week ending 21 August 2020
(cJA edit)AnatolyKasparov wrote:Actually it doesn't get mentioned much but the Welsh administration has the best ratings for its handling of the virus.
---
This is absolutely true. And Mark Drakeford has been excellent throughout, he's a smart and understated fellow.AnatolyKasparov wrote:Actually it doesn't get mentioned much but the Welsh administration has the best ratings for its handling of the virus.
(better than the Scottish government's, never mind Johnson's)