Morning all...from Daves Incompetence Index yesterday -
@PfY: Is it possible that Theresa May is actually trying to do the right thing on the paedophile dossier and that Cameron is systematically undermining her credibility?
@RR2: He's got to be very very careful. This is one of the issues that I think people really won't stand for any of his ridiculous attempts at tricksy dodgings and waving away noncholantly ... as the Jimmy Savile stuff gets worse and worse - people are beginning to realise that what might once have seemed beyond the realms of reality, been able to be dismissed as paranoia, just cannot be anymore. Some of the truth has been worse than people might have imagined.*
A very odd day yesterday...I think we've finally found a Tory with b******s
. Ms May (of the kitten heels and 'I'm not making this up' fame) has gone up in my estimation. I heard the part of her speech yesterday regarding the Wanless report where she stated, in Parliament (so recorded in Hansard) that, although they found no evidence of a cover-up, that didn't mean there wasn't a cover-up...and then....
"we are determined to get to the truth of this" - I know I live in Hope and am far too optimistic, but to me it was a genuine statement. It gets better...as linked yesterday, OGRFG then had a go...and I think he may have finally FUBARed himself, rather than undermining Ms May.
The Beeb (possibly, in this case, not the Bullingdon Broadcasting Corp) has this (still there this morning - and it's quite detailed - don't be put off by the title)...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30002908
"It is, therefore, not possible to say whether files were ever removed or destroyed to cover up or hide allegations of organised or systematic child abuse by particular individuals because of the systems then in place," the report said.
"It follows that we cannot say that no file was removed or destroyed for that reason. By making those observations they should not be misinterpreted.
"We do not conclude that there is any basis for thinking that anything happened to files that should not have happened to them, but identify that limitation in our review.
"Further, and with the same caveat, our review cannot be taken to have concluded one way or the other whether there was organised child abuse that has yet to be fully uncovered - indeed it is public knowledge that active police investigations examining allegations of historic child abuse are under way."
Prime Minister David Cameron said the report meant people "looking for conspiracy theories" would "have to look elsewhere".
But speaking to BBC Radio 4's PM, Peter Wanless said David Cameron was "wrong" to say his report proved there was no cover-up.
"He can only say that into the registered filing system of the Home Office.
"I think it's really important that no-one regards our piece of work as the beginning and end of all this," he said.
The Beeb? Reporting Dodgy Dave as being wrong? No wonder the Currant Bun was having a go at Ms May yesterday - their boy might be in a bit of trouble and they couldn't pin it on Mr Ed (for once!) Suffice to say, the Survivors are distinctly unimpressed and it has most definitely put 'clear blue water' between Dave and Teresa. Even Uncle Ruperts' putrid organs won't publicly condone Survivors being told they're conspiracists any more (changing the habit of over 30 years of complicity in this horrific mess by desperately manufacturing shiny squirrels - see Mazher Mahmood)
*Some of the truth has been worse than people might have imagined.
I'm afraid to say what has been reported in the MSM thus far is just the tip of the iceberg...if a small proportion of the accusations in Conspiracy-World are correct, the truth is going to get a whole lot worse.
)
