ohsocynical wrote:Just a thought, but if God forbid Dave gets in in May and they go ahead with cutting overweight people's benefits, what's the betting they'll introduce a limit to how much people can weigh. I don't think for a moment IDS will be satisfied with 1,780 people losing out. He'll want a jolly sight more than that.
I believe the weight that qualifies a female as obese is around fourteen stone.
If someone is so overweight it stops them from working, I would imagine it would be reasonable to assume that they are suffering psychological problems that would require expert help.
This is just another way of reducing the benefit bill by not treating psychological conditions the same as physical conditions. Just as learning difficulties have been dismissed by a Tory MP as simply the result of a poor education, obesity is equally being dismissed as simply preferring to sign on. The tone is one more and more of mental health issues not actually existing at all. It feels like we're going backward, which of course is the intention, because the main reason why incapacity benefit claims grew so much under New Labour was because people with mental health conditions had been supported by charities to claim benefits they were entitled to for the first time. To most people this would be seen as a good thing, with the most vulnerable people in our society accessing support they need, but for the Tories it's just extra money spent by Labour on the great unwashed which they would prefer spent on more "worthy" causes like reducing inheritance tax.
Needless to say, the vermin really need to be kicked out.