Saturday 28th & Sunday 29th March 2015

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 5:47 pm

PorFavor wrote:Is anyone else experiencing "General Error and SQuirreL" syndrome? I've been in and out like a fart in a colander, as my sainted grandmother would have said.

I'm having very slow loading again....I know it's not my computer because I gave it a good clean out a couple of days ago, and everywhere else is at its normal - fast - speed.

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 5:48 pm

ErnstRemarx wrote:
yahyah wrote:
pk1 wrote:Does Katie Hopkins assume Justine Miliband is not Jewish or doesn't she care ?

Apart from that aspect, it is a weird comment so what is she suggesting ?
That Ed would kill his wife because she isn't popular enough ?
Fuck knows. Suffice to say that Hopkins doesn't have blood in her veins like ordinary people - she has a mixture of poison, bile and dog vomit. In a world where standards of behaviour and decency often disappoint me, she manages to generate new lows with her twisted hatred.

A nasty, nasty woman. I Tweeted that we might all wish her Karma....

pk1 · Post by **pk1** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 5:50 pm

ErnstRemarx wrote:
yahyah wrote:
pk1 wrote:Does Katie Hopkins assume Justine Miliband is not Jewish or doesn't she care ?

Apart from that aspect, it is a weird comment so what is she suggesting ?
That Ed would kill his wife because she isn't popular enough ?
Fuck knows. Suffice to say that Hopkins doesn't have blood in her veins like ordinary people - she has a mixture of poison, bile and dog vomit. In a world where standards of behaviour and decency often disappoint me, she manages to generate new lows with her twisted hatred.

'Scuse me but even on the rare occasion when one of my dogs vomit, it still smells sweeter & is easier to clear up than anything that emits from that walking bag of shit !

ErnstRemarx · Post by **ErnstRemarx** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 5:51 pm

ohsocynical wrote:
ErnstRemarx wrote:
yahyah wrote: Apart from that aspect, it is a weird comment so what is she suggesting ?
That Ed would kill his wife because she isn't popular enough ?
Fuck knows. Suffice to say that Hopkins doesn't have blood in her veins like ordinary people - she has a mixture of poison, bile and dog vomit. In a world where standards of behaviour and decency often disappoint me, she manages to generate new lows with her twisted hatred.

A nasty, nasty woman. I Tweeted that we might all wish her Karma....

I'd love to think that she could be penniless and in need of help in a world filled with people like her - not a world I'd want to inhabit, but one that she clearly craves.

tinyclanger2 · Post by **tinyclanger2** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 5:53 pm

I'm afraid they were as cute as this:

: baby badger.jpg (6.1 KiB) Viewed 8385 times

PorFavor · Post by **PorFavor** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:03 pm

Make parliament responsible for leaders' TV debates, says Sir Gus O'Donnell

Former civil service chief says process of organising debates ahead of general elections should be taken out of hands of media and political parties

Douglas Alexander, Labour’s general election strategy chief, welcomed O’Donnell’s comments. “David Cameron seems to be the only person in the country who doesn’t want to see a head-to-head debate,” he said.

He renewed calls for Cameron to change his mind and submit to a one-on-one debate with Miliband before polling day on 7 May: “With six weeks to polling day there is still time in this campaign for David Cameron to change his mind and debate Ed Miliband head-to-head before polling day. Today, on behalf of Labour, I’m challenging him to do just that.”‎ (Guardian)

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... s-odonnell

No chance. This is the only level of debate that David Cameron is capable of:

David Cameron has mounted a personal attack on Ed Miliband as he accused the Labour leader of leading a group of “hypocritical holier-than-thou, hopeless, sneering socialists” who had betrayed their traditional values.

pk1 · Post by **pk1** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:22 pm

Mike Smithson @MSmithsonPB · 11m 11 minutes ago

CON lead with @OpiniumResearch down 2 to 1%

CON 34 (-2)
LAB 33 (=)
LD 8 (+1)
UKIP 13 (-1)
GRN 7 (+1)

yahyah · Post by **yahyah** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:26 pm

PorFavor wrote:
Make parliament responsible for leaders' TV debates, says Sir Gus O'Donnell

Former civil service chief says process of organising debates ahead of general elections should be taken out of hands of media and political parties

Douglas Alexander, Labour’s general election strategy chief, welcomed O’Donnell’s comments. “David Cameron seems to be the only person in the country who doesn’t want to see a head-to-head debate,” he said.

He renewed calls for Cameron to change his mind and submit to a one-on-one debate with Miliband before polling day on 7 May: “With six weeks to polling day there is still time in this campaign for David Cameron to change his mind and debate Ed Miliband head-to-head before polling day. Today, on behalf of Labour, I’m challenging him to do just that.”‎ (Guardian)
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... s-odonnell

No chance. This is the only level of debate that David Cameron is capable of:

David Cameron has mounted a personal attack on Ed Miliband as he accused the Labour leader of leading a group of “hypocritical holier-than-thou, hopeless, sneering socialists” who had betrayed their traditional values.

Radio 4 news at 6pm reported various aspects of what Cameron's been up to, but strangely missed out that.

tinyclanger2 · Post by **tinyclanger2** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:28 pm

pk1 wrote:Mike Smithson @MSmithsonPB · 11m 11 minutes ago

CON lead with @OpiniumResearch down 2 to 1%

CON 34 (-2)
LAB 33 (=)
LD 8 (+1)
UKIP 13 (-1)
GRN 7 (+1)

BLOODY HELL FELLOW COUNTRYMEN GET A GRIP

sorry. just lost it for a moment.

yahyah · Post by **yahyah** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:29 pm

Blame the baby badgers Tiny.

tinyclanger2 · Post by **tinyclanger2** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:31 pm

yeah. damn badgers. staying over here, minding their own business and looking cute.

yahyah · Post by **yahyah** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:35 pm

I see Dancuk's phone malfunctioned [so he insists] and it favourited hard core pornography.

Haven't got a smart phone so not sure how these problems occur.
Does it ever happen that sites with fluffy bunnies or nuns at prayer ever get favourited in error ?

AnatolyKasparov · Post by **AnatolyKasparov** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:35 pm

Polling for that survey finished on Wednesday apparently - a bit strange.

citizenJA · Post by **citizenJA** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:38 pm

PorFavor wrote:
Make parliament responsible for leaders' TV debates, says Sir Gus O'Donnell

Former civil service chief says process of organising debates ahead of general elections should be taken out of hands of media and political parties

Douglas Alexander, Labour’s general election strategy chief, welcomed O’Donnell’s comments. “David Cameron seems to be the only person in the country who doesn’t want to see a head-to-head debate,” he said.

He renewed calls for Cameron to change his mind and submit to a one-on-one debate with Miliband before polling day on 7 May: “With six weeks to polling day there is still time in this campaign for David Cameron to change his mind and debate Ed Miliband head-to-head before polling day. Today, on behalf of Labour, I’m challenging him to do just that.”‎ (Guardian)
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... s-odonnell

No chance. This is the only level of debate that David Cameron is capable of:

David Cameron has mounted a personal attack on Ed Miliband as he accused the Labour leader of leading a group of “hypocritical holier-than-thou, hopeless, sneering socialists” who had betrayed their traditional values.

Astounding. Dave ranted. Nothing more. Dave in a room full of Tories demeaned the office of Prime Minister by lambasting Miliband so disrespectfully as to be astonishing.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... t-49599571" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:44 pm

ErnstRemarx wrote:
ohsocynical wrote:
ErnstRemarx wrote: Fuck knows. Suffice to say that Hopkins doesn't have blood in her veins like ordinary people - she has a mixture of poison, bile and dog vomit. In a world where standards of behaviour and decency often disappoint me, she manages to generate new lows with her twisted hatred.

A nasty, nasty woman. I Tweeted that we might all wish her Karma....
I'd love to think that she could be penniless and in need of help in a world filled with people like her - not a world I'd want to inhabit, but one that she clearly craves.

You're kinder than me. I'd wish her the same or worse than she said for Justine Miliband.

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:47 pm

ohsocynical wrote:
ErnstRemarx wrote:
ohsocynical wrote:
A nasty, nasty woman. I Tweeted that we might all wish her Karma....
I'd love to think that she could be penniless and in need of help in a world filled with people like her - not a world I'd want to inhabit, but one that she clearly craves.
You're kinder than me. I'd wish her the same or worse than she said for Justine Miliband.

After 70 years on this earth I'm sick of turning the other cheek and making excuses for her and those like her. We'd be better off without them.

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:49 pm

citizenJA wrote:
PorFavor wrote:
Make parliament responsible for leaders' TV debates, says Sir Gus O'Donnell

Former civil service chief says process of organising debates ahead of general elections should be taken out of hands of media and political parties

Douglas Alexander, Labour’s general election strategy chief, welcomed O’Donnell’s comments. “David Cameron seems to be the only person in the country who doesn’t want to see a head-to-head debate,” he said.

He renewed calls for Cameron to change his mind and submit to a one-on-one debate with Miliband before polling day on 7 May: “With six weeks to polling day there is still time in this campaign for David Cameron to change his mind and debate Ed Miliband head-to-head before polling day. Today, on behalf of Labour, I’m challenging him to do just that.”‎ (Guardian)
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... s-odonnell

No chance. This is the only level of debate that David Cameron is capable of:

David Cameron has mounted a personal attack on Ed Miliband as he accused the Labour leader of leading a group of “hypocritical holier-than-thou, hopeless, sneering socialists” who had betrayed their traditional values.
Astounding. Dave ranted. Nothing more. Dave in a room full of Tories demeaned the office of Prime Minister by lambasting Miliband so disrespectfully as to be astonishing.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... t-49599571" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And not how you're supposed to win friends and influence people, let alone get people to vote for you.

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:58 pm

The media says the country has turned more left in the last five years. And that dear Dave is a pissed off country embracing our socialist values so up yours.

pk1 · Post by **pk1** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 6:58 pm

AnatolyKasparov wrote:Polling for that survey finished on Wednesday apparently - a bit strange.

The details & tables are up but yes, it's strange that they only polled on the 24th & 25th.

http://ourinsight.opinium.co.uk/survey- ... march-2015" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 7:00 pm

citizenJA wrote:
PorFavor wrote:
Make parliament responsible for leaders' TV debates, says Sir Gus O'Donnell

Former civil service chief says process of organising debates ahead of general elections should be taken out of hands of media and political parties

Douglas Alexander, Labour’s general election strategy chief, welcomed O’Donnell’s comments. “David Cameron seems to be the only person in the country who doesn’t want to see a head-to-head debate,” he said.

He renewed calls for Cameron to change his mind and submit to a one-on-one debate with Miliband before polling day on 7 May: “With six weeks to polling day there is still time in this campaign for David Cameron to change his mind and debate Ed Miliband head-to-head before polling day. Today, on behalf of Labour, I’m challenging him to do just that.”‎ (Guardian)
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... s-odonnell

No chance. This is the only level of debate that David Cameron is capable of:

David Cameron has mounted a personal attack on Ed Miliband as he accused the Labour leader of leading a group of “hypocritical holier-than-thou, hopeless, sneering socialists” who had betrayed their traditional values.
Astounding. Dave ranted. Nothing more. Dave in a room full of Tories demeaned the office of Prime Minister by lambasting Miliband so disrespectfully as to be astonishing.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... t-49599571" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

As my mum used to say: Blood will out.

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 7:06 pm

Affordable housing and tax avoidance up for discussion at Reading Quakers' public meeting

Parliamentary candidates and councillors from all parties have been invited to the meeting at 7.30pm on Wednesday, April 1.

http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/local- ... up-8924907

Even though I'm not into religion, this I like

ScarletGas · Post by **ScarletGas** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 7:24 pm

Good evening everyone.

Re: Katie Hopkins.

Its clear that this excuse for a human being has some serious physiological issues which she advertises each time she emits her obnoxious opinions
However,if there is a positive its this.The more she and her fellow tory poster girls such as Sarah Vine,Laura Zissman,Mylene Klass and the harpie from the US pontificate their obnoxious views the more sense the people will see in an anti conservative vote.
Or is this just wishful thinking?

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 7:45 pm

ScarletGas wrote:Good evening everyone.

Re: Katie Hopkins.

Its clear that this excuse for a human being has some serious physiological issues which she advertises each time she emits her obnoxious opinions
However,if there is a positive its this.The more she and her fellow tory poster girls such as Sarah Vine,Laura Zissman,Mylene Klass and the harpie from the US pontificate their obnoxious views the more sense the people will see in an anti conservative vote.
Or is this just wishful thinking?

I think you are right up to a point, but it also gives the sick lurkers who haven't been brave enough to spout their poison, an opening.

Is she going to get away with an anti-semetic Tweet or at least get a warning?

Edited because I wasn't making sense.

discordantharmony · Post by **discordantharmony** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 7:49 pm

yahyah wrote:I see Dancuk's phone malfunctioned [so he insists] and it favourited hard core pornography.

Haven't got a smart phone so not sure how these problems occur.
Does it ever happen that sites with fluffy bunnies or nuns at prayer ever get favourited in error ?

HaHaHa........

You just made my entire day with that comment

Evening all BTW.

Tubby Isaacs · Post by **Tubby Isaacs** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 7:49 pm

That mug's causing a lot of consternation. Very stupid thing to do.

citizenJA · Post by **citizenJA** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 8:15 pm

Good-evening, ScarletGas, Discordandharmony & Tubby Isaaces!
Apologies if I've neglected to name a specific friend I've not had the pleasure of reading for awhile.
Good-evening, all.

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 8:17 pm

The 2015 Election ‏@AgeAylesbury 6 mins6 minutes ago

.@KayBurley + #JeremyPaxman 'bias' against @Ed_Miliband prompts 13,000 complaints to #Ofcom

That's a huge number. Anyone know if its correct?

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 8:23 pm

Tubby Isaacs wrote:That mug's causing a lot of consternation. Very stupid thing to do.

Even bloody Paxman quoted him the other night.

PorFavor · Post by **PorFavor** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 8:31 pm

Tubby Isaacs wrote:That mug's causing a lot of consternation. Very stupid thing to do.

I don't trust him. I wouldn't be surprised if he pulled a stunt relating to his candidacy if he could be sure to make his money elsewhere.

AnatolyKasparov · Post by **AnatolyKasparov** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 8:36 pm

Um, that isn't the "mug" that Tubby is referring to I think......

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 8:45 pm

AnatolyKasparov wrote:Um, that isn't the "mug" that Tubby is referring to I think......

I thought he meant Danzik

Willow904 · Post by **Willow904** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 8:46 pm

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/20 ... isnt-gaffe

Simple messages are a bit useless when trying to convey complex policies. I understand the pledge and support it (because I know people who feel they have been pushed out of their jobs by companies who have ditched full time British workers for Eastern European agency temps and have voted Ukip as a result but could be persuaded back to Labour). The mug is probably a mistake, but given the way the Tories are behaving at the moment, it's almost classy in comparison.

citizenJA · Post by **citizenJA** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:03 pm

ohsocynical wrote:
AnatolyKasparov wrote:Um, that isn't the "mug" that Tubby is referring to I think......
I thought he meant Danzik

Me too!

Spacedone · Post by **Spacedone** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:04 pm

I won't post it here but I urge you to take a look at Martin Rowson's latest effort at the Guardian if you've not already seen it.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... 83d0da0092" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ScarletGas · Post by **ScarletGas** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:06 pm

ohsocynical wrote:
ScarletGas wrote:Good evening everyone.

Re: Katie Hopkins.

Its clear that this excuse for a human being has some serious physiological issues which she advertises each time she emits her obnoxious opinions
However,if there is a positive its this.The more she and her fellow tory poster girls such as Sarah Vine,Laura Zissman,Mylene Klass and the harpie from the US pontificate their obnoxious views the more sense the people will see in an anti conservative vote.
Or is this just wishful thinking?
I think you are right up to a point, but it also gives the sick lurkers who haven't been brave enough to spout their poison, an opening.

Is she going to get away with an anti-semetic Tweet or at least get a warning?

Edited because I wasn't making sense.

No argument from me on that.
I was just trying to get some positivity from what I think most reasonable people will deem to be the obnoxious opinions of a group of throughly disreputable people

tinyclanger2 · Post by **tinyclanger2** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:11 pm

ohsocynical wrote:The 2015 Election ‏@AgeAylesbury 6 mins6 minutes ago

.@KayBurley + #JeremyPaxman 'bias' against @Ed_Miliband prompts 13,000 complaints to #Ofcom

That's a huge number. Anyone know if its correct?

I thought it was 130?
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 38774.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

PorFavor · Post by **PorFavor** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:27 pm

tinyclanger2 wrote:
ohsocynical wrote:The 2015 Election ‏@AgeAylesbury 6 mins6 minutes ago

.@KayBurley + #JeremyPaxman 'bias' against @Ed_Miliband prompts 13,000 complaints to #Ofcom

That's a huge number. Anyone know if its correct?
I thought it was 130?
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 38774.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I thought that I'd seen, earlier today, that it had hit the 400s.

tinyclanger2 · Post by **tinyclanger2** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:28 pm

PorFavor wrote:
tinyclanger2 wrote:
ohsocynical wrote:The 2015 Election ‏@AgeAylesbury 6 mins6 minutes ago

.@KayBurley + #JeremyPaxman 'bias' against @Ed_Miliband prompts 13,000 complaints to #Ofcom

That's a huge number. Anyone know if its correct?
I thought it was 130?
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 38774.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I thought that I'd seen, earlier today, that it had hit the 400s.

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/m ... complaints" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
ah - :
c. 110 to Ofcom
> 300 to Channel 4
c. 30 to Sky News

PorFavor · Post by **PorFavor** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:30 pm

Is this mug a china mug with writing on it? Having read back a bit, that's all I can think of. Can someone please fill me in (yeah, yeah, form an orderly queue . . . )?

Edited to add an "s"

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:39 pm

ScarletGas wrote:
ohsocynical wrote:
ScarletGas wrote:Good evening everyone.

Re: Katie Hopkins.

Its clear that this excuse for a human being has some serious physiological issues which she advertises each time she emits her obnoxious opinions
However,if there is a positive its this.The more she and her fellow tory poster girls such as Sarah Vine,Laura Zissman,Mylene Klass and the harpie from the US pontificate their obnoxious views the more sense the people will see in an anti conservative vote.
Or is this just wishful thinking?
I think you are right up to a point, but it also gives the sick lurkers who haven't been brave enough to spout their poison, an opening.

Is she going to get away with an anti-semetic Tweet or at least get a warning?

Edited because I wasn't making sense.
No argument from me on that.
I was just trying to get some positivity from what I think most reasonable people will deem to be the obnoxious opinions of a group of throughly disreputable people

We have celebrities who have only become celebrities on the strength of being obnoxious or are lauded even when they've broken the law. I'm glad my kids are grown now and I don't have to steer them through it all.

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:42 pm

tinyclanger2 wrote:
PorFavor wrote:
tinyclanger2 wrote: I thought it was 130?
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 38774.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I thought that I'd seen, earlier today, that it had hit the 400s.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/m ... complaints" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
ah - :
c. 110 to Ofcom
> 300 to Channel 4
c. 30 to Sky News

An over enthusiastic, wishful thinking Tweeter then.

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:43 pm

PorFavor wrote:Is this mug a china mug with writing on it? Having read back a bit, that's all I can think of. Can someone please fill me in (yeah, yeah, form an orderly queue . . . )?

Edited to add an "s"

Can't help on that one.

AngryAsWell · Post by **AngryAsWell** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:46 pm

PorFavor wrote:Is this mug a china mug with writing on it? Having read back a bit, that's all I can think of. Can someone please fill me in (yeah, yeah, form an orderly queue . . . )?

Edited to add an "s"

Yes, and a bad move one

PorFavor · Post by **PorFavor** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:48 pm

AngryAsWell wrote:
PorFavor wrote:Is this mug a china mug with writing on it? Having read back a bit, that's all I can think of. Can someone please fill me in (yeah, yeah, form an orderly queue . . . )?

Edited to add an "s"
Yes, and a bad move one

Oh. And??

(At least tell me for whom, please. I'm worried now.)

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:52 pm

@UtopianDreams

Wondered if you had remembered Cameron's Big Society election spiel, which was/is being investigated for financial irregularities. It was reported by the Independent last year. Lots of money vanished? via some of Dave's chums.

AngryAsWell · Post by **AngryAsWell** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:53 pm

PorFavor wrote:
AngryAsWell wrote:
PorFavor wrote:Is this mug a china mug with writing on it? Having read back a bit, that's all I can think of. Can someone please fill me in (yeah, yeah, form an orderly queue . . . )?

Edited to add an "s"
Yes, and a bad move one
Oh. And??

(At least tell me for whom, please. I'm worried now.)

Have PM'ed you

ohsocynical · Post by **ohsocynical** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:53 pm

PorFavor wrote:
AngryAsWell wrote:
PorFavor wrote:Is this mug a china mug with writing on it? Having read back a bit, that's all I can think of. Can someone please fill me in (yeah, yeah, form an orderly queue . . . )?

Edited to add an "s"
Yes, and a bad move one
Oh. And??

(At least tell me for whom, please. I'm worried now.)

I would imagine Labour. Not sure but immigration?

rearofthestore · Post by **rearofthestore** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:53 pm

I think this is the mug

TheGrimSqueaker · Post by **TheGrimSqueaker** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:55 pm

An utterly desperate piece at the Telegraph, another attempt to whip up hysteria about a Labour leadership contest. Half hearted personal jibes at Miliband from both Cameron and Osborne, thin gruel like this Telegraph piece ..... Miliband has them running scared, and they've clearly don't know what to do any more. It will undoubtedly get dirtier, nastier and more personal but, as Paxman found out the other night, that may just end up with Miliband gaining support simply because we don't like seeing people bullied in this country.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... iband.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Night all. I'll leave you with the latest YouGov figures and a reminder to put your clocks forward tonight.

Mike Smithson ‏@MSmithsonPB · 15s15 seconds ago
LAB takes 4% lead with YouGov in poll all taken after Thurs TV programme
LAB 36%
Con 32%
LD 8%
Ukip 13%
Green 6

tinyclanger2 · Post by **tinyclanger2** » Sat 28 Mar, 2015 9:56 pm

very bad move