Re: Thursday 7th May
Posted: Fri 08 May, 2015 6:11 am
LMAO
refitman wrote:Naz Shah has beaten galloway by ~11k.
Far from it:pk1 wrote:LD gain Newark from Con !!
LMAO
Newark
Con hold with a 35.3% majority, 71% turnout
candidates votes %
Robert Jenrick 29,834 57.0%
Michael Payne 11,360 21.7%
Brian Mapletoft 6,294 12.0%
David Dobbie 2,385 4.6%
Elayne Forster 1,792 3.4%
Helen Tyrer 637 1.2%
utopiandreams wrote:Perhaps Osborne is quite the strategist after all and Cameron's view of politics can earn a First at Oxford. I find it somewhat troubling, under-handed plots and nasty schemes are not a right and proper way to govern a country.
The former I think.StephenDolan wrote:Was it the 'scared of the SNP in coalition ' or 'he's too wierd and left wing' that caused this in England?
Fear of the SNP. And for all those who think think this proves Ed should have talked to Sturgeon, that wouldn't have changed this outcome, probably intensified it.StephenDolan wrote:Was it the 'scared of the SNP in coalition ' or 'he's too wierd and left wing' that caused this in England?
Not from people I met, as the polls were closing, who told me they'd voted Con because the economy's doing so well and wages are increasing. They looked shocked when I told them what's really going on. Just wish I'd seen them before they'd voted – not that a bare handful would have made a difference in this constituency...StephenDolan wrote:Was it the 'scared of the SNP in coalition ' or 'he's too wierd and left wing' that caused this in England?
I noticed he tweeted us earlier. I resisted telling him to fuck off.TheGrimSqueaker wrote:Fear of the SNP. And for all those who think think this proves Ed should have talked to Sturgeon, that wouldn't have changed this outcome, probably intensified it.StephenDolan wrote:Was it the 'scared of the SNP in coalition ' or 'he's too wierd and left wing' that caused this in England?
To all Twitterers, probably best to stay clear for a bit, Rusty is lurking and being his usual unpleasant self.
I had one person at work express shock when I pointed out that Osborne has borrowed more than all Labour chancellors and borrowing as share of GDP was lower under Labour.LadyCentauria wrote:Not from people I met, as the polls were closing, who told me they'd voted Con because the economy's doing so well and wages are increasing. They looked shocked when I told them what's really going on. Just wish I'd seen them before they'd voted – not that a bare handful would have made a difference in this constituency...StephenDolan wrote:Was it the 'scared of the SNP in coalition ' or 'he's too wierd and left wing' that caused this in England?
Splash of milk in mine, no sugar.StephenDolan wrote:Time for a cuppa, nearly time to get 'up'!
I just muted the little turd.refitman wrote:I noticed he tweeted us earlier. I resisted telling him to fuck off.TheGrimSqueaker wrote:Fear of the SNP. And for all those who think think this proves Ed should have talked to Sturgeon, that wouldn't have changed this outcome, probably intensified it.StephenDolan wrote:Was it the 'scared of the SNP in coalition ' or 'he's too wierd and left wing' that caused this in England?
To all Twitterers, probably best to stay clear for a bit, Rusty is lurking and being his usual unpleasant self.
pk1 wrote:Fuck ! EVEL will now be on the table !
The annoying thing is that we weren't outplayed by Cameron, who has been dire. This election was won, again, by Murdoch and Dacre.yahyah wrote:pk1 wrote:Fuck ! EVEL will now be on the table !
We've been stitched and we've been stitched up proper.
We've been outplayed.
Mine is, "Look What They've Done To My Song (Ma)" by Melanieyahyah wrote:Well, my contribution to the election play list is John Lee Hookers 'The Same Old Blues Again'.
Dreading it.yahyah wrote:pk1 wrote:Fuck ! EVEL will now be on the table !
We've been stitched and we've been stitched up proper.
We've been outplayed.
Oh fuck! I'd forgotten Leveson...yahyah wrote:& of course, no Levenson.
The media will get even worse. Murdoch's happy, Scottish Labour wiped out, Tories back in.
Harder for Labour in the future. Worst case scenario.
Leveson even. Tiredness added the extra n.LadyCentauria wrote:Oh fuck! I'd forgotten Leveson...yahyah wrote:& of course, no Levenson.
The media will get even worse. Murdoch's happy, Scottish Labour wiped out, Tories back in.
Harder for Labour in the future. Worst case scenario.
No top down reorganisation of the NHS.pk1 wrote:HS2; Airline expansion
They might be feeling delighted now but 5 years is a long time to govern when your promises can't be met.
Bedroom tax; increased tuition feesStephenDolan wrote:No top down reorganisation of the NHS.pk1 wrote:HS2; Airline expansion
They might be feeling delighted now but 5 years is a long time to govern when your promises can't be met.
The greenest government ever.
Unfortunately these don't matter. What does matter is Scottish MPs being in government. Perish the thought.