FlyTheNest

StephenDolan wrote:'The papers hail PM's financial disclosure ' says the BBC.

How brave and prime ministerial it was of him, we are truly blessed. Right, time to move on, what's that funny commy Corbyn up to?

BBC. Blatantly Biased C...

Ministers abandon plan to scrap farm animal welfare codes
Defra confirms U-turn after outcry over move to repeal legislation and put industry in charge of guidance on chicken farming
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/ ... en-farming" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The Prime Minister was quite clear at first that he had not, and will not “in the future”, benefit from any offshore trusts. And that, after all, is a much fairer way of assessing behaviour than the old-fashioned method our legal system is based on, which concerns itself solely with the past.

With this approach, a defendant could reply to the question “Did you break through a wall and rob Hatton Garden?” by saying “Look, I’ve been through this several times and let’s be absolutely clear, I stand to gain nothing from robbing any jewellery stores in the future.” And off they’d go.

PoliticsHome Retweeted
Kevin Schofield ‏@PolhomeEditor 6m6 minutes ago Ealing, London
ICYMI EXCLUSIVE: Jeremy Corbyn could face a Shadow Cabinet walkout after the EU referendum http://polho.me/1TE3Qfm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Juliet Samuel ‏@CitySamuel 4m4 minutes ago
Cameron's most dishonest act in all this: not declaring all his assets on MP register. This is what the Icelandic PM resigned over.

GMB Politics ‏@GMBPolitics 34m34 minutes ago
Nick Boles struggling a bit in the interview on @BBCBreakfast - drew the short straw this morning, eh?

Nick Robinson ‏@bbcnickrobinson 5m5 minutes ago
What sticks in mind about PM's interview on tax? Impressions not the detail. Red face, £300k & a very complex explanation

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:I believe Cameron will go, and soon.

He's surely no longer the leader that polls ahead of his party and he's unfit to lead the Remain cause. Assuming that the "establishment" doesn't want Brexit, they need to get shot of Dave quick. Quite who could step into the role isn't clear to me.

One thing that amuses me is that should Dave resign now, Boris is in trouble. There's no way a Brexit campaigner could become PM.

rebeccariots2 wrote:

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:I believe Cameron will go, and soon.

He's surely no longer the leader that polls ahead of his party and he's unfit to lead the Remain cause. Assuming that the "establishment" doesn't want Brexit, they need to get shot of Dave quick. Quite who could step into the role isn't clear to me.

One thing that amuses me is that should Dave resign now, Boris is in trouble. There's no way a Brexit campaigner could become PM.

I don't think he'll go until he absolutely has to. He's shameless. That seems to be one of his main characteristics and it seems to be a necessary feature for a Tory PM and / or minister. And, as you rightly say, they've not really got anyone looking credible as a successor. I'm sure there are plenty of them who think they are just whizz bang perfect for the job though. Loads of them who think they'd 'be good at it'.

And also there’s the cash from the smack trade, says Cameron
08-04-16
THE prime minister has admitted making £80,000 from importing heroin but that it ended well before the 2010 election.

David Cameron inherited the business, which included opium fields in Malaysia and a processing factory in Malta, but insists he sold his shares two months before he became prime minister.

He continued: “My father’s heroin business was not so much aimed at narcotics refinement as providing a decent income to those former subjects of the Empire left high and dry by independence.

“The unfortunate fact that it was, and is, in contravention of some international laws is really irrelevant. This business kept people in work during some pretty tough times.

“When I was 18 I actually did some door-to-door work selling the product and let me tell you it was very much needed by the ordinary, decent people of Britain.

“I sold the shares, half of which were owned by my wife Samantha, in February 2010 for actually slightly less than the market value, and sadly wasn’t able to pay tax because I feared the authorities would kick up a fuss.

“Now, if my opponents are finished dragging my late father’s name through the mud, I have a country to run.”

nickyinnorfolk wrote:Charlie Stayt on BBC Breakfast shredding Nick Boles regarding his defence of Cameron.
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I didn't hear it, but my other half says that by contrast Boles got a very easy ride on the Today programme.

Andrew Simms ‏@AndrewSimms_uk 23m23 minutes ago
Hinkley C delay more likely. EDF shares down about 60% on year. Renewables better value @NewWeatherInst @inter_gen

http://gu.com/p/4t79n?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Tweet" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; …

rebeccariots2 wrote:

Juliet Samuel ‏@CitySamuel 4m4 minutes ago
Cameron's most dishonest act in all this: not declaring all his assets on MP register. This is what the Icelandic PM resigned over.

Ian Dunt Retweeted
Katie Grant ‏@kt_grant 17m17 minutes ago
Poor form for Zac not to bother showing up to the mayoral debate on bbc London.

Telegraph Business ‏@telebusiness 5m5 minutes ago
UK manufacturing slumps as trade deficit with EU hits fresh record ahead of Brexit vote http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/201 ... um=twitter" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; …

rebeccariots2 wrote:

Telegraph Business ‏@telebusiness 5m5 minutes ago
UK manufacturing slumps as trade deficit with EU hits fresh record ahead of Brexit vote http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/201 ... um=twitter" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; …

How much longer can the Tories carry on pretending the economy is OK?

How much longer will they be allowed to get away with doing so?

Stephen Pollard Retweeted
Andrew Lilico ‏@andrew_lilico 10m10 minutes ago
If Labour want to be seen as the sort of folk who want to be 1st in the queue to attack their own fathers, their current strategy's perfect.

Earlier this week, after Cameron/Number 10’s second attempt to answer questions about his involvement with his late father’s offshore trust (the ITV interview was attempt number five), I said Cameron had probably said enough to close this down as a story. I’m sorry about that; it turned out to be a very duff call. Today Cameron is under as much pressure as ever, and I will be covering all the developments in detail.

Willow904 wrote:

rebeccariots2 wrote:

Juliet Samuel ‏@CitySamuel 4m4 minutes ago
Cameron's most dishonest act in all this: not declaring all his assets on MP register. This is what the Icelandic PM resigned over.

This is where he's very clearly done something wrong, although Owen Smith was very good on BBC News about the basic hypocrisy of criticising the immoral, but legal world of tax avoidance when he himself was clearly part of that world. Only selling his shares when he became PM, rather than when he became an MP, and keeping it quiet doesn't look good for him, even if the morally repugnant tax dodging, as he himself put it, is not technically against our tax laws. Random Tories saying he's paid all tax owed on dividends etc are idiots, really, as how could they possibly know that for certain?

Stuart Millar ‏@stuartmillar159 8m8 minutes ago
This is great from @JohnHarris1969: Cameron’s admission is a sudden insight into what the Tories stand for http://gu.com/p/4t76c/stw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And the prime minister clearly had a keen sense of his core constituency. As one wag put it on Twitter this week, “How fortunate for people with money in offshore trusts that the prime minister went out to bat for them.” Quite so. On top of Cameron’s problems, the role of an array of Tory donors named in the Panama Papers comes with an air of grinding familiarity. Then there are Osborne’s evasive answers to questions about whether he has benefited from offshore chicanery and other matters that are on the public record – such as the fact that in 2005, his family firm gained £6m from a complex London property deal with a firm based in the British Virgin Islands. And what of the Conservatives’ increasingly hopeless-looking candidate for London mayor?. Zac Goldsmith’s family wealth has long been held in a trust based in Switzerland, until 2010 he was registered as a non-dom, and he owns two valuable houses acquired through companies registered in the Cayman Islands. His veneer of ecological concern and vague bohemianism cannot quite distract from all this, nor from the fact that his quietly formidable Labour opponent Sadiq Khan is engaging in a modern class politics, to evidently positive effect.

PressData_Politics ‏@PD_Politics 28m28 minutes ago
UKIP race row over activist who has fun 'blacking up' |@heraldscotland frontpage @GardhamHT http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/1441 ... _campaign/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; …

Natalie Bennett Retweeted
kt ‏@smileykt 2h2 hours ago Bradford, England
I think John Humphreys should be ashamed of that junior doctor interview, awful. @BBCr4today

rebeccariots2 wrote:

PoliticsHome Retweeted
Kevin Schofield ‏@PolhomeEditor 6m6 minutes ago Ealing, London
ICYMI EXCLUSIVE: Jeremy Corbyn could face a Shadow Cabinet walkout after the EU referendum http://polho.me/1TE3Qfm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Well - we couldn't have a week where the disaffected didn't shout and stamp their feet a bit, eh.

StephenDolan wrote:'The papers hail PM's financial disclosure ' says the BBC.

How brave and prime ministerial it was of him, we are truly blessed. Right, time to move on, what's that funny commy Corbyn up to?

BBC. Blatantly Biased C...

PaulfromYorkshire wrote:I believe Cameron will go, and soon.

He's surely no longer the leader that polls ahead of his party and he's unfit to lead the Remain cause. Assuming that the "establishment" doesn't want Brexit, they need to get shot of Dave quick. Quite who could step into the role isn't clear to me.

One thing that amuses me is that should Dave resign now, Boris is in trouble. There's no way a Brexit campaigner could become PM.

NonOxCol wrote:I can't help but think that historians will find this story as potent a symbol of the age as the infamous sayings of Marie Antoinette were for pre-revolutionary France.

When they review contemporary source material, I hope they're equally aghast at the yawning disconnect between the elites and the masses revealed by some of the media coverage.

PorFavor wrote:Good morfternoon.

Answer me this, please (as I think I may have missed it).

Was David Cameron's interest in this Blairmore set-up ever registered in the Register of Members' Financial Interests?

RogerOThornhill wrote:Morning all.

Quick dip in before I shoot off to the library. Just spent a happy few hours getting a chapter ready to send off...and it's gone.

re cameron. I don't think I've seen so much whataboutery come out before. lets's see...

Guardian owned by offshore company - no it isn't
ISAs - it's govt sponsored savings scheme
Miliband's inheritance tax
Owen Jones selling books on Amazon!
That Greek bloke

and many more. Pretty hilarious stuff really.

OK, off now.

RobertSnozers wrote:

AnatolyKasparov wrote:Did all these "its disgraceful to besmirch his father's memory" people pipe up after "ED MILIBAND'S DAD HATED BRITAIN"??

Do not bother sending answers on a postcard, do not pass Go, do not collect £200

Quite. The trollish glee over that was very unseemly, and that was over someone who had fought in WW2. That said, I think a lot of people on the right thought that the Mail had gone too far, and it was pretty obvious that they were selectively quoting and twisting things like mad.

And presumably people are only besmirching Cameron the elder if the things he's said to have done aren't true?

ohsocynical wrote:

RobertSnozers wrote:

AnatolyKasparov wrote:Did all these "its disgraceful to besmirch his father's memory" people pipe up after "ED MILIBAND'S DAD HATED BRITAIN"??

Do not bother sending answers on a postcard, do not pass Go, do not collect £200

Quite. The trollish glee over that was very unseemly, and that was over someone who had fought in WW2. That said, I think a lot of people on the right thought that the Mail had gone too far, and it was pretty obvious that they were selectively quoting and twisting things like mad.

And presumably people are only besmirching Cameron the elder if the things he's said to have done aren't true?

It's sickening. And Ed's father hadn't done anything wrong. Except for being Jewish, because that's what it was really about.

rebeccariots2 wrote:

Stuart Millar ‏@stuartmillar159 8m8 minutes ago
This is great from @JohnHarris1969: Cameron’s admission is a sudden insight into what the Tories stand for http://gu.com/p/4t76c/stw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And the prime minister clearly had a keen sense of his core constituency. As one wag put it on Twitter this week, “How fortunate for people with money in offshore trusts that the prime minister went out to bat for them.” Quite so. On top of Cameron’s problems, the role of an array of Tory donors named in the Panama Papers comes with an air of grinding familiarity. Then there are Osborne’s evasive answers to questions about whether he has benefited from offshore chicanery and other matters that are on the public record – such as the fact that in 2005, his family firm gained £6m from a complex London property deal with a firm based in the British Virgin Islands. And what of the Conservatives’ increasingly hopeless-looking candidate for London mayor?. Zac Goldsmith’s family wealth has long been held in a trust based in Switzerland, until 2010 he was registered as a non-dom, and he owns two valuable houses acquired through companies registered in the Cayman Islands. His veneer of ecological concern and vague bohemianism cannot quite distract from all this, nor from the fact that his quietly formidable Labour opponent Sadiq Khan is engaging in a modern class politics, to evidently positive effect.

PorFavor wrote:Good morfternoon.

Answer me this, please (as I think I may have missed it).

Was David Cameron's interest in this Blairmore set-up ever registered in the Register of Members' Financial Interests?