Tuesday 12th July 2016

A home from home
Forum rules
Welcome to FTN. New posters are welcome to join the conversation. You can follow us on Twitter @FlythenestHaven You are responsible for the content you post. This is a public forum. Treat it as if you are speaking in a crowded room. Site admin and Moderators are volunteers who will respond as quickly as they are able to when made aware of any complaints. Please do not post copyrighted material without the original authors permission.
User avatar
JustMom
Committee Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed 27 Aug, 2014 1:10 am

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by JustMom »

I wish a new party would spring up with the same views and thoughts as Jeremy,I can't see me ever supporting labour again.
I feel dead sick over all this.
PaulfromYorkshire
Site Admin
Posts: 8331
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by PaulfromYorkshire »

Interesting counter-argument on Twitter that secret ballot may actually be due to terrified Corbyn supporters!
PaulfromYorkshire
Site Admin
Posts: 8331
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by PaulfromYorkshire »

JustMom wrote:I wish a new party would spring up with the same views and thoughts as Jeremy,I can't see me ever supporting labour again.
I feel dead sick over all this.
I completely understand how you feel, but if all the good guys walk away...

Please try to hang on in there. There will still be good councillors and MPs to vote for depending where you are.
GetYou
Minister of State
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu 12 Feb, 2015 6:16 pm
Location: Labour-Liberal marginal

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by GetYou »

I disagree, Paul. The good councillors and MPs will be answerable to the wreckers for evermore.

If all the good guys walk away we can perhaps forge something better and leave these bastards to rot.
TobyLatimer
Chief Whip
Posts: 1189
Joined: Tue 28 Jul, 2015 9:05 am

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by TobyLatimer »

Is the fix in? What Tom Watson would have to do to get Labour’s NEC to exclude Jeremy Corbyn from a leadership ballot

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
SpinningHugo
Prime Minister
Posts: 4211
Joined: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 1:22 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by SpinningHugo »

JonnyT1234 wrote:You do realise, Hugo, that the reason why so many people voted for Corbyn was that it was because they believed the Labour Party was doomed if they didn't?

Have you ever, ever, ever once thought like this in that weird little 'I am always right, you are always wrong' world of yours? Ever?
Yes of course I know that.

I think they are all wrong.

Why do you think I keep arguing the opposite? For the jokes?
PaulfromYorkshire
Site Admin
Posts: 8331
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by PaulfromYorkshire »

Laura KuenssbergVerified account ‏@bbclaurak
Corbyn apparently back in room at NEC - does that mean there's been a decision? If you've followed Labour politics for a while..probably not
ohsocynical
Prime Minister
Posts: 10937
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:10 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by ohsocynical »

Stephen Bush ‏@stephenkb 1h1 hour ago

"Watson has stitched it up", texts senior loyalist.
We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. – Aesop
SpinningHugo
Prime Minister
Posts: 4211
Joined: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 1:22 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by SpinningHugo »

AnatolyKasparov wrote:They think they don't need members (save for a few unthinking drones to deliver a few leaflets, maybe)

Its about getting money from rich donors and favourable media coverage. As I just said, they are almost certainly deluded about both.
I am sure they do need members. However, as you will know when it does come down to the actual leg work, many of the new younger ones don't show up.
SpinningHugo
Prime Minister
Posts: 4211
Joined: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 1:22 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by SpinningHugo »

AnatolyKasparov wrote:It might be worth pointing out again that yesterday our incoming PM espoused several positions placing her to the left of a hefty chunk of Labour MPs.

What is the point of a Labour party where such people hold the whip hand even existing?

Make no mistake though, that is what the "dark forces" behind this coup want. Selfish, venal, and above all profoundly death defyingly stupid.
Oh what rot.

It has been done in the open. he has been stabbed in the front. The overwhelming majority of the PLP couldn't carry on with him as leader. It wasn't a tiny Blairite clique as you would prefer.

Unless Watson (!?!) is now a Blairite.
Lost Soul
Committee Chair
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri 01 Jul, 2016 3:40 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by Lost Soul »

So, they haven't actually voted yet... ?

Or have I missed something ?
User avatar
ephemerid
Speaker of the House
Posts: 2690
Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 11:56 am

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by ephemerid »

mbc1955 wrote:
SpinningHugo wrote:
AnatolyKasparov wrote:He may have fixed it, but at what cost? The end of the Labour party as we have known it, quite possibly.

I hope he feels it was worth it in the years and decades to come.
Difficult, indeed invidious, choice.

Try and think like me and Watson.

If you think, as Watson and I do, that Labour is utterly doomed if Corbyn carries on as leader what do you do?

You have to be pretty damn committed to ensuring members get their way to allow Corbyn to go forward without requiring he has support of 1/5th of MPs and MEPs.

I do understand that others don't accept the premise that Watson and I share.

[Of course we don't know the result yet.]
I would rip my brain out through my ears if I ever thought like you, you slimy little toad, applauding the kind of third world political fix that this country used to condemn without even thinking. You pollute this forum.


:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

You rock, mbc1955.
"Poverty is the worst form of violence" - Mahatma Gandhi
SpinningHugo
Prime Minister
Posts: 4211
Joined: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 1:22 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by SpinningHugo »

GetYou wrote:
frightful_oik wrote:I wonder who'll pay for those nice suits when the unions withdraw their funding.
Should Corbyn be excluded from the ballot and my Union not step in, I will be withdrawing my political levy immediately and encouraging everyone else at my workplace to do so. It's the reasonable thing to do.
He is not being exluded from the ballot (if that is the conclusion).

He will need 1/5th of the PLP, EPLP to be on it like anyone else
AnatolyKasparov
Prime Minister
Posts: 15720
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by AnatolyKasparov »

I liked my MP until he went a bit mad after the last GE (it started before Jez won, but that made it much worse)

Not sure if I could even vote for him now, even if the party holds together.

If it really does come to a split, its the people at grassroots level who are really going to feel it - just as in 1981.

Erstwhile friends and even families divided, just horrible.

As with much else, it could have been different had the b***ard Blairites just supported Ed.

They could go down in history as reviled as Ramsay Mac and his quislings (even if that word wasn't invented then) back in 1931.
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
ohsocynical
Prime Minister
Posts: 10937
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:10 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by ohsocynical »

GetYou wrote:I disagree, Paul. The good councillors and MPs will be answerable to the wreckers for evermore.

If all the good guys walk away we can perhaps forge something better and leave these bastards to rot.
All I can think is, do these MPs think it's all going to be touchy feely lets put the past behind us at the next GE?
What's going to be the point of voting Labour, because they've plainly told thousands of us where to go ...
We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. – Aesop
Rebecca
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon 08 Sep, 2014 7:27 am

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by Rebecca »

SpinningHugo wrote:
JonnyT1234 wrote:You do realise, Hugo, that the reason why so many people voted for Corbyn was that it was because they believed the Labour Party was doomed if they didn't?

Have you ever, ever, ever once thought like this in that weird little 'I am always right, you are always wrong' world of yours? Ever?
Yes of course I know that.

I think they are all wrong.

Why do you think I keep arguing the opposite? For the jokes?
Because you are an annoying little shit who keeps getting booted off the Guardian.
User avatar
danesclose
Whip
Posts: 882
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 8:06 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by danesclose »

SpinningHugo wrote:Mary Turner of GMB is absent from the NEC because of 'illness'.

The oldest trick in the book.

Watson has fixed it.

That is what Watson was elected to do.
Back briefly between having a life.
2016-07-12_175132.jpg
2016-07-12_175132.jpg (26.78 KiB) Viewed 7383 times
Turns out Mary Turner is actually in hospital, rather than performing "the oldest trick in the book".
Hugo, I'd like to think that this will impact in some way on your smug, patronising tone, but I very much doubt it will.

A bientot
Proud to be part of The Indecent Minority.
GetYou
Minister of State
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu 12 Feb, 2015 6:16 pm
Location: Labour-Liberal marginal

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by GetYou »

:rofl: Thanks Rebecca that has properly made me chuckle
SpinningHugo
Prime Minister
Posts: 4211
Joined: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 1:22 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by SpinningHugo »

ohsocynical wrote:
mbc1955 wrote:
SpinningHugo wrote: Difficult, indeed invidious, choice.

Try and think like me and Watson.

If you think, as Watson and I do, that Labour is utterly doomed if Corbyn carries on as leader what do you do?

You have to be pretty damn committed to ensuring members get their way to allow Corbyn to go forward without requiring he has support of 1/5th of MPs and MEPs.

I do understand that others don't accept the premise that Watson and I share.

[Of course we don't know the result yet.]
I would rip my brain out through my ears if I ever thought like you, you slimy little toad, applauding the kind of third world political fix that this country used to condemn without even thinking. You pollute this forum.
I hope Hugo will put his money where his mouth is. He'll need more than one comfortable pair of shoes to deliver leaflets and knock on doors to make up for the lack of willing supporters these mealy mouthed MPs will have driven away.

Lets see them survive when the money dries up, and they're out there wearing their feet out in order to get elected.

And on the subject of voting for them, who says half a million angry members will?
Well, I have done plenty of walking the streets for Labour in the past (including campaigning in seats we took from the Tories in both 92 and 97).

I resigned from Labour on 12 September last year. At the moment whether i even vote Labour will depend on the individual candidate.

So, you may well criticise me for not having a dog in this fight any longer.

However, i did not think it was a requirement of posting here that I am a Labour party member?
SpinningHugo
Prime Minister
Posts: 4211
Joined: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 1:22 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by SpinningHugo »

danesclose wrote:
SpinningHugo wrote:Mary Turner of GMB is absent from the NEC because of 'illness'.

The oldest trick in the book.

Watson has fixed it.

That is what Watson was elected to do.
Back briefly between having a life.
2016-07-12_175132.jpg
Turns out Mary Turner is actually in hospital, rather than performing "the oldest trick in the book".
Hugo, I'd like to think that this will impact in some way on your smug, patronising tone, but I very much doubt it will.

A bientot
of course, i was clearly flat wrong.
ohsocynical
Prime Minister
Posts: 10937
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:10 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by ohsocynical »

SpinningHugo wrote:
AnatolyKasparov wrote:They think they don't need members (save for a few unthinking drones to deliver a few leaflets, maybe)

Its about getting money from rich donors and favourable media coverage. As I just said, they are almost certainly deluded about both.
I am sure they do need members. However, as you will know when it does come down to the actual leg work, many of the new younger ones don't show up.
That's fucking insulting to the thousands of volunteers who walked themselves to a standstill at the GE for council elections and for the Ref ... And I've seen them so don't try that old bullshit on me.
We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. – Aesop
SpinningHugo
Prime Minister
Posts: 4211
Joined: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 1:22 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by SpinningHugo »

AnatolyKasparov wrote: As with much else, it could have been different had the b***ard Blairites just supported Ed.

.
1. Always looking backwards

2. Always the Blairites fault.
AnatolyKasparov
Prime Minister
Posts: 15720
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by AnatolyKasparov »

SpinningHugo wrote:
AnatolyKasparov wrote:It might be worth pointing out again that yesterday our incoming PM espoused several positions placing her to the left of a hefty chunk of Labour MPs.

What is the point of a Labour party where such people hold the whip hand even existing?

Make no mistake though, that is what the "dark forces" behind this coup want. Selfish, venal, and above all profoundly death defyingly stupid.
Oh what rot.

It has been done in the open. he has been stabbed in the front. The overwhelming majority of the PLP couldn't carry on with him as leader. It wasn't a tiny Blairite clique as you would prefer.

Unless Watson (!?!) is now a Blairite.
Typically, you obsess over such narrow legalistic points.

You may recall I didn't vote for Watson last year - I have never trusted him and indeed thought his behaviour in 2006 was pretty disgraceful.

(and pointless, Blair was going anyway in due course - sound familiar?)

The point is, the space for the sort of Labour party he wants no longer exists. Its day is done.

Its either a meaningful explicitly leftist alternative to the Tories - or nothing.

(that doesn't mean Corbyn, it does mean much of his political programme has to live on)
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
ohsocynical
Prime Minister
Posts: 10937
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:10 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by ohsocynical »

I can only walk a few yards but even I managed to deliver leaflets you apology for a human being.
Fuck new Labour. Fuck Wilson. Fuck Eagle and the rest of the mealy mouthed PLP.

I wish you joy of it.
We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. – Aesop
SpinningHugo
Prime Minister
Posts: 4211
Joined: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 1:22 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by SpinningHugo »

RobertSnozers wrote:I remember a previous post which was to the effect of 'try to think like me and Blair', suggesting that Tony Blair had to intervene in the Labour leadership election because he couldn't stay out. Result - a lot more votes for Corbyn.

I really think a legal blog written by someone with no apparent legal knowledge should not be repeatedly posted on these pages.
i am afraid that isn't fair one either me or Blair.

Blair only intervened right at the end long after it was clear Corbyn was going to win by a mile. He knows as well as everyone else what his standing with the membership is.

As for the legal knowledge bit, yes i am completely sure you are right.
AnatolyKasparov
Prime Minister
Posts: 15720
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by AnatolyKasparov »

SpinningHugo wrote:
AnatolyKasparov wrote: As with much else, it could have been different had the b***ard Blairites just supported Ed.

.
1. Always looking backwards

2. Always the Blairites fault.
Its because of them, that we are where we are now.

Suck it up.
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
Rebecca
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon 08 Sep, 2014 7:27 am

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by Rebecca »

RobertSnozers wrote:
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
JustMom wrote:I wish a new party would spring up with the same views and thoughts as Jeremy,I can't see me ever supporting labour again.
I feel dead sick over all this.
I completely understand how you feel, but if all the good guys walk away...

Please try to hang on in there. There will still be good councillors and MPs to vote for depending where you are.
Not with a party led by MPs prepared to betray everything the party is supposed to stand for. I will not legitimise them by voting for anyone standing on the same platform.

Corbyn kept off the ballot = Labour dead to me. Sorry to those who want to stay and make it work, but I could not condone the seizure of power in that way.
Couldn't agree more.
Even if/when Corbyn is elected leader again it will be hard to stomach the pile of shits in the PLP.
Really would like a split.
I loathe some of the PLP as much as the Tories.
ohsocynical
Prime Minister
Posts: 10937
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:10 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by ohsocynical »

RobertSnozers wrote:
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
JustMom wrote:I wish a new party would spring up with the same views and thoughts as Jeremy,I can't see me ever supporting labour again.
I feel dead sick over all this.
I completely understand how you feel, but if all the good guys walk away...

Please try to hang on in there. There will still be good councillors and MPs to vote for depending where you are.
Not with a party led by MPs prepared to betray everything the party is supposed to stand for. I will not legitimise them by voting for anyone standing on the same platform.

Corbyn kept off the ballot = Labour dead to me. Sorry to those who want to stay and make it work, but I could not condone the seizure of power in that way.
You can't work with people who cheat and lie. They've been very plain about the majority of their membership. We're dogs, a mob, a rabble. They don't give a tinkers cuss about us. Glad of the money, but not wanting the responsibility that comes with it.
We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. – Aesop
ohsocynical
Prime Minister
Posts: 10937
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:10 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by ohsocynical »

Rebecca wrote:
RobertSnozers wrote:
PaulfromYorkshire wrote: I completely understand how you feel, but if all the good guys walk away...

Please try to hang on in there. There will still be good councillors and MPs to vote for depending where you are.
Not with a party led by MPs prepared to betray everything the party is supposed to stand for. I will not legitimise them by voting for anyone standing on the same platform.

Corbyn kept off the ballot = Labour dead to me. Sorry to those who want to stay and make it work, but I could not condone the seizure of power in that way.
Couldn't agree more.
Even if/when Corbyn is elected leader again it will be hard to stomach the pile of shits in the PLP.
Really would like a split.
I loathe some of the PLP as much as the Tories.
I think in this instance they've proved themselves worse.
We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. – Aesop
Rebecca
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon 08 Sep, 2014 7:27 am

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by Rebecca »

ohsocynical wrote:
RobertSnozers wrote:
PaulfromYorkshire wrote: I completely understand how you feel, but if all the good guys walk away...

Please try to hang on in there. There will still be good councillors and MPs to vote for depending where you are.
Not with a party led by MPs prepared to betray everything the party is supposed to stand for. I will not legitimise them by voting for anyone standing on the same platform.

Corbyn kept off the ballot = Labour dead to me. Sorry to those who want to stay and make it work, but I could not condone the seizure of power in that way.
You can't work with people who cheat and lie. They've been very plain about the majority of their membership. We're dogs, a mob, a rabble. They don't give a tinkers cuss about us. Glad of the money, but not wanting the responsibility that comes with it.
Well,Mrs Ohso,if they keep Corbyn off the ballot they will be seeing a lot more of the dogs/mob and rabble.
I will donate to Momentum the minute it happens.
User avatar
mbc1955
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:47 pm
Location: Stockport, Great Manchester in body, the Lake District at heart
Contact:

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by mbc1955 »

SpinningHugo wrote:
ohsocynical wrote:
mbc1955 wrote: I would rip my brain out through my ears if I ever thought like you, you slimy little toad, applauding the kind of third world political fix that this country used to condemn without even thinking. You pollute this forum.
I hope Hugo will put his money where his mouth is. He'll need more than one comfortable pair of shoes to deliver leaflets and knock on doors to make up for the lack of willing supporters these mealy mouthed MPs will have driven away.

Lets see them survive when the money dries up, and they're out there wearing their feet out in order to get elected.

And on the subject of voting for them, who says half a million angry members will?
Well, I have done plenty of walking the streets for Labour in the past (including campaigning in seats we took from the Tories in both 92 and 97).

I resigned from Labour on 12 September last year. At the moment whether i even vote Labour will depend on the individual candidate.

So, you may well criticise me for not having a dog in this fight any longer.

However, i did not think it was a requirement of posting here that I am a Labour party member?
You mealy-mouthed little toad, if this forum had requirements for posting they would have been framed to exclude you permanently a very long time ago. You are an utterly disgraceful little shit.
The truth ferret speaks!
TobyLatimer
Chief Whip
Posts: 1189
Joined: Tue 28 Jul, 2015 9:05 am

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by TobyLatimer »

Much easier on the blood pressure if one doesn't engage.

We might not all agree, but personally speaking I find it simpler just gloss over and ignore if I know in advance that the red mist will arise from reading posts of a certain nature.
SpinningHugo
Prime Minister
Posts: 4211
Joined: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 1:22 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by SpinningHugo »

AnatolyKasparov wrote:
(and pointless, Blair was going anyway in due course - sound familiar?)

The point is, the space for the sort of Labour party he wants no longer exists. Its day is done.

Its either a meaningful explicitly leftist alternative to the Tories - or nothing.

(that doesn't mean Corbyn, it does mean much of his political programme has to live on)
1. Not it doesn't 'sound familiar'. Your claim that Corbyn would quit is not credible. Over-optimism.

2. Nobody but nobody thinks a Blairite will be leading the Labour party. As you gleefully like pointing out, Kendall got 4.5%. David Miliband is not making a comeback. The party is a long way from 2010, let alone 1997.

3. I didn't vote for Watson either, but it is the soft left who have come for Corbyn: they are the ones with the numbers, not the Blairite rump.
User avatar
ephemerid
Speaker of the House
Posts: 2690
Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 11:56 am

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by ephemerid »

RobertSnozers wrote:I remember a previous post which was to the effect of 'try to think like me and Blair', suggesting that Tony Blair had to intervene in the Labour leadership election because he couldn't stay out. Result - a lot more votes for Corbyn.

I really think a legal blog written by someone with no apparent legal knowledge should not be repeatedly posted on these pages.

Agreed.
"Poverty is the worst form of violence" - Mahatma Gandhi
Rebecca
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon 08 Sep, 2014 7:27 am

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by Rebecca »

ephemerid wrote:
RobertSnozers wrote:I remember a previous post which was to the effect of 'try to think like me and Blair', suggesting that Tony Blair had to intervene in the Labour leadership election because he couldn't stay out. Result - a lot more votes for Corbyn.

I really think a legal blog written by someone with no apparent legal knowledge should not be repeatedly posted on these pages.

Agreed.
Like anyone reads it anyway.
PaulfromYorkshire
Site Admin
Posts: 8331
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by PaulfromYorkshire »

You cannot be serious ;-)
Attachments
Screen Shot 2016-07-12 at 18.54.15.png
Screen Shot 2016-07-12 at 18.54.15.png (42.42 KiB) Viewed 7216 times
PorFavor
Prime Minister
Posts: 15167
Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:18 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by PorFavor »

Whatever your views on the leadership of the Labour Party (and I imagine that you all know mine) this is an unedifying, embarrassing and distressing mess. I may have my suspicions about the brick incident but that doesn't justify Angela Eagle and the BBC claiming, without any proof (or none that they're sharing, which amounts to the same thing), that they know for a certainty.
User avatar
mbc1955
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:47 pm
Location: Stockport, Great Manchester in body, the Lake District at heart
Contact:

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by mbc1955 »

TobyLatimer wrote:Much easier on the blood pressure if one doesn't engage.

We might not all agree, but personally speaking I find it simpler just gloss over and ignore if I know in advance that the red mist will arise from reading posts of a certain nature.
I take your point, but sometimes points that are particularly offensive should be greeted robustly.

Ideally, nobody should engage Hugo under any circumstances, he should be completely frozen out. I will ignore him if everyone else does.
The truth ferret speaks!
Rebecca
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon 08 Sep, 2014 7:27 am

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by Rebecca »

PorFavor wrote:Whatever your views on the leadership of the Labour Party (and I imagine that you all know mine) this is an unedifying, embarrassing and distressing mess. I may have my suspicions about the brick incident but that doesn't justify Angela Eagle and the BBC claiming, without any proof (or none that they're sharing, which amounts to the same thing), that they know for a certainty.
If they know they can prove it I suppose.
TR'sGhost
Minister of State
Posts: 493
Joined: Sat 07 Nov, 2015 2:02 am

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by TR'sGhost »

SpinningHugo wrote:
danesclose wrote:
SpinningHugo wrote:Mary Turner of GMB is absent from the NEC because of 'illness'.

The oldest trick in the book.

Watson has fixed it.

That is what Watson was elected to do.
Back briefly between having a life.
2016-07-12_175132.jpg
Turns out Mary Turner is actually in hospital, rather than performing "the oldest trick in the book".
Hugo, I'd like to think that this will impact in some way on your smug, patronising tone, but I very much doubt it will.

A bientot
of course, i was clearly flat wrong.
Now that's not something I recall you ever acknowledging before.

It might be a good idea to arrange for your post saying Tom Watson had rigged things to be deleted, along with any comments that quote it. Because it looks remarkably libellous from where I'm sitting.

I'm surprised such a deep thinking, legally astute ever-present Net God such as yourself didn't consider that risk when you posted it.
I'm getting tired of calming down....
utopiandreams
Speaker of the House
Posts: 2306
Joined: Mon 16 Mar, 2015 4:20 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by utopiandreams »

Okay, I'm back. Have just seen Laura Kuenssberg on BBC News speaking of months and months of behind the scenes manoeuvring, plots, or whatever it was she called them, but no mention whatsoever of her own role in these.
I would close my eyes if I couldn't dream.
SpinningHugo
Prime Minister
Posts: 4211
Joined: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 1:22 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by SpinningHugo »

Micahel Crick's tweets of interest

https://twitter.com/MichaelLCrick" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Corbyn refused to leave when NEC Chair asked him to.

meeting could last another 2-4 hours.

Secret ballot vote was 17-15: so very tight.
PorFavor
Prime Minister
Posts: 15167
Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:18 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by PorFavor »

Michael Crick

@MichaelLCrick

One source tells me they reckon Labour NEC meeting could last another 3-4 hours
6:04 PM - 12 Jul 2016

148 148 Retweets
33 (Politics Live, Guardian)
User avatar
refitman
Site Admin
Posts: 7819
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:22 pm
Location: Wombwell, United Kingdom

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by refitman »

Can we please try to keep it civil and reign back from personal abuse.
GetYou
Minister of State
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu 12 Feb, 2015 6:16 pm
Location: Labour-Liberal marginal

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by GetYou »

https://twitter.com/PeoplesMomentum/sta ... 2539087872

Momentum ‏@PeoplesMomentum 2h2 hours ago

Abuse is unacceptable. Cynically using incidents to score political points or blame an entire movement is too.
yahyah
Prime Minister
Posts: 7535
Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 8:29 am
Location: Being rained on in west Wales

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by yahyah »

JustMom wrote:Jeremy Corby said it was a total fabrication he refused to leave the meeting,he left right away.

Radio 4 was reporting it as he refused to leave when I came in from gardening, not more than an hour ago. Norman Smith made it sound like WW3 had broken out and no one was safe anywhere near a Labour supporter who was to the left of Frank Field.

Madness. Maybe Robert Harris got his plot for The Ghost wrong.
It is more like Labour's version of Murder on the Orient Express, they've all killed the party.

I honestly don't know who to trust. Am feeling p***ed off with both sides.
SpinningHugo
Prime Minister
Posts: 4211
Joined: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 1:22 pm

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by SpinningHugo »

TR'sGhost wrote:
SpinningHugo wrote:
danesclose wrote: Back briefly between having a life.
2016-07-12_175132.jpg
Turns out Mary Turner is actually in hospital, rather than performing "the oldest trick in the book".
Hugo, I'd like to think that this will impact in some way on your smug, patronising tone, but I very much doubt it will.

A bientot
of course, i was clearly flat wrong.
Now that's not something I recall you ever acknowledging before.

It might be a good idea to arrange for your post saying Tom Watson had rigged things to be deleted, along with any comments that quote it. Because it looks remarkably libellous from where I'm sitting.

I'm surprised such a deep thinking, legally astute ever-present Net God such as yourself didn't consider that risk when you posted it.
You think Watson didn't try and persuade people to vote the way he would prefer?

Very noble of him if so.

I think what i said was honest comment (and wouldn't make reasonable people think worse of Watson anyway).

Oh, and one other thing I admitted I was wrong about was Labour's prospects in 2015. By the end I had allowed over-optimism to overcome my reason and thought labour would be in government. Foolish of me and I acknowledged my stupidity. Labour's position was actually much worse than I had realised.
Last edited by SpinningHugo on Tue 12 Jul, 2016 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
yahyah
Prime Minister
Posts: 7535
Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 8:29 am
Location: Being rained on in west Wales

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by yahyah »

That wasn't a rant. More sadness than anything.
yahyah
Prime Minister
Posts: 7535
Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 8:29 am
Location: Being rained on in west Wales

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by yahyah »

I remember getting angry with Temulkar a long while back when he thought we were daft to stick with Labour. He said we women wouldn't tell another woman to stick with an abusive partner, one that kept messing her up.

Well Tem, you were right. It's just been too many times this has happened.
User avatar
mbc1955
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:47 pm
Location: Stockport, Great Manchester in body, the Lake District at heart
Contact:

Re: Tuesday 12th July 2016

Post by mbc1955 »

Having regard to the temper this evening, I am refraining from further posting today.
The truth ferret speaks!
Locked