Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Forum rules
Welcome to FTN. New posters are welcome to join the conversation. You can follow us on Twitter @FlythenestHaven You are responsible for the content you post. This is a public forum. Treat it as if you are speaking in a crowded room. Site admin and Moderators are volunteers who will respond as quickly as they are able to when made aware of any complaints. Please do not post copyrighted material without the original authors permission.
Welcome to FTN. New posters are welcome to join the conversation. You can follow us on Twitter @FlythenestHaven You are responsible for the content you post. This is a public forum. Treat it as if you are speaking in a crowded room. Site admin and Moderators are volunteers who will respond as quickly as they are able to when made aware of any complaints. Please do not post copyrighted material without the original authors permission.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Morning.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... r-patients" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
GPs issuing thousands more fit notes for patients
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... r-patients" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
GPs issuing thousands more fit notes for patients
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Good morfternoon.
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
John McD on Toady now.
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... tory-party" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Anna Soubry: I am not sorry for calling on May to 'sling out' Brexit MPs"
"Anna Soubry: I am not sorry for calling on May to 'sling out' Brexit MPs"
She added: “Perhaps for the first time ever in the Conservative party people are equally determined that they are not going to get their own way. I am prepared to compromise – they are not – and we are fed up.”
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Continuing on fom the very first early- morning BBC news two words stick in the mind about John McD's forthcoming speech .
"Workers, and Irreversible."
Nick Robinson conducted a very silly and hectoring interview on Today, where J McD was very sensible !
The Water Companies have taken out £18bn in dividends over ten years, they are loaded to the gunwales with debt, and ''prices have increased 40%'' . (Don't know if that was in real terms or not ...)
Of course it finished with the standard question on Brexit policy, and the standard answer ....." zzzzz "
"Workers, and Irreversible."
Nick Robinson conducted a very silly and hectoring interview on Today, where J McD was very sensible !
The Water Companies have taken out £18bn in dividends over ten years, they are loaded to the gunwales with debt, and ''prices have increased 40%'' . (Don't know if that was in real terms or not ...)
Of course it finished with the standard question on Brexit policy, and the standard answer ....." zzzzz "
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Britain's Brexit self-punishment
http://chrisgreybrexitblog.blogspot.co. ... l?spref=tw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot. ... aster.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://chrisgreybrexitblog.blogspot.co. ... l?spref=tw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Theresa May's Looming Brexit DisasterWhat is never on display from the Brexiters is any kind of practical plan to deliver what they want. That is fundamentally because what they want is undeliverable – in essence, undiluted political nationalism as well as undiluted economic globalism – and secondarily because by refusing to recognize that impossibility they are unable to come up with some diluted version of it which, if not desirable, might at least be achievable.
http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot. ... aster.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Will the 'sensible' tories ever stand up and be counted, or will they let the country go down the pan.This week Theresa May has been at pains to say Britain is leaving the single market and will not be in the customs union. At pains. Once again, because party management comes before all else for the leader of this accursed outfit, she is totally unnecessarily allowing the hard right zealots in her party to hold her hostage even though they haven't the numbers, the unity nor the nous to deliver the hard Brexit they want on their terms.
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Because of the way the Tories privatised water it will be extremely expensive to renationalise. I think its necessary to do so. Indeed I think it a far higher priority than renationalising rail, but given the bias within our media, making the case for water renationalisation against the huge costs, as long as the public are misled over how government finance works and how the assets balance out the debt, will be challenging. I wonder if it was perhaps better when it was just a quiet, overlooked policy in the manifesto providing a mandate to just get on and do it if and when Labour ever get voted into office.
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
But isn't McDonnell right that if you compensate shareholders with government bonds it costs nothing? You just issue them, make money from the utilities and pay the bondholders back in due course.Willow904 wrote:Because of the way the Tories privatised water it will be extremely expensive to renationalise. I think its necessary to do so. Indeed I think it a far higher priority than renationalising rail, but given the bias within our media, making the case for water renationalisation against the huge costs, as long as the public are misled over how government finance works and how the assets balance out the debt, will be challenging. I wonder if it was perhaps better when it was just a quiet, overlooked policy in the manifesto providing a mandate to just get on and do it if and when Labour ever get voted into office.
The message that needs to get out is that the government (and us) will win here because these utilities make a lot of money that will be heading to the Treasury instead of to shareholders.
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Interesting though to see how you fix the coupon on those bonds ...PaulfromYorkshire wrote:But isn't McDonnell right that if you compensate shareholders with government bonds it costs nothing? You just issue them, make money from the utilities and pay the bondholders back in due course.Willow904 wrote:Because of the way the Tories privatised water it will be extremely expensive to renationalise. I think its necessary to do so. Indeed I think it a far higher priority than renationalising rail, but given the bias within our media, making the case for water renationalisation against the huge costs, as long as the public are misled over how government finance works and how the assets balance out the debt, will be challenging. I wonder if it was perhaps better when it was just a quiet, overlooked policy in the manifesto providing a mandate to just get on and do it if and when Labour ever get voted into office.
The message that needs to get out is that the government (and us) will win here because these utilities make a lot of money that will be heading to the Treasury instead of to shareholders.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
That's well beyond my capacity frog.frog222 wrote:Interesting though to see how you fix the coupon on those bonds ...PaulfromYorkshire wrote:But isn't McDonnell right that if you compensate shareholders with government bonds it costs nothing? You just issue them, make money from the utilities and pay the bondholders back in due course.Willow904 wrote:Because of the way the Tories privatised water it will be extremely expensive to renationalise. I think its necessary to do so. Indeed I think it a far higher priority than renationalising rail, but given the bias within our media, making the case for water renationalisation against the huge costs, as long as the public are misled over how government finance works and how the assets balance out the debt, will be challenging. I wonder if it was perhaps better when it was just a quiet, overlooked policy in the manifesto providing a mandate to just get on and do it if and when Labour ever get voted into office.
The message that needs to get out is that the government (and us) will win here because these utilities make a lot of money that will be heading to the Treasury instead of to shareholders.
But the principle seems fine to me. Taking profit-making utilities into public ownership can't possibly be bad for government finances in my simplified view of the world!
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
I suppose May's real problem isn't so much the minority of hard Brexit MPs as the majority of hard Brexit Tory voters. Brexit is the only thing keeping the Tories in power. If she goes for a soft Brexit the press will destroy her and the votes could fall away and with them her position as leader. If Barnier forces a soft Brexit upon her at the eleventh hour, however, is it possible she could make it to March 2019 without a leadership challenge and thus without a damaging cliff edge "no deal" break from the EU? Certainly I find it hard to believe she is genuinely pursuing a hard Brexit - no one could possibly want to leave behind that kind of legacy and May seems to me to be a person who cares about their legacy. She will look for opportunities to blame the EU and blame the opposition, to try to convince Tory leave voters she was on their side but constrained by circumstance and the hardliners in the party could struggle to denounce and overthrow her because of the hard Brexit language she has used.gilsey wrote:Britain's Brexit self-punishment
http://chrisgreybrexitblog.blogspot.co. ... l?spref=tw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Theresa May's Looming Brexit DisasterWhat is never on display from the Brexiters is any kind of practical plan to deliver what they want. That is fundamentally because what they want is undeliverable – in essence, undiluted political nationalism as well as undiluted economic globalism – and secondarily because by refusing to recognize that impossibility they are unable to come up with some diluted version of it which, if not desirable, might at least be achievable.
http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot. ... aster.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Will the 'sensible' tories ever stand up and be counted, or will they let the country go down the pan.This week Theresa May has been at pains to say Britain is leaving the single market and will not be in the customs union. At pains. Once again, because party management comes before all else for the leader of this accursed outfit, she is totally unnecessarily allowing the hard right zealots in her party to hold her hostage even though they haven't the numbers, the unity nor the nous to deliver the hard Brexit they want on their terms.
It's just a theory. And she has never been a staunch remainer, so there's no real reason to assume she's playing such a game, yet at the same time it's so blindingly obvious that a hard Brexit will be economically disastrous I find it hard to believe a serious politician (as opposed to an over-privileged man-child like Rees-Mogg) would truly go through with it.
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Is May a deep enigma, or is there really nothing there? We don't really have any clue, all we know is that she thinks words are a substitute for action.Willow904 wrote: It's just a theory. And she has never been a staunch remainer, so there's no real reason to assume she's playing such a game, yet at the same time it's so blindingly obvious that a hard Brexit will be economically disastrous I find it hard to believe a serious politician (as opposed to an over-privileged man-child like Rees-Mogg) would truly go through with it.
Is she a serious politician?
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Very good post there Willow, I must admit my own reasoning on this is pretty similar.
And that is a beautiful description of JRM
And that is a beautiful description of JRM
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
-
- First Secretary of State
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 11:34 am
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Good morning
Can I add my compliments to Willow's post
I do have some sympathy for both Corbyn and May in that they are in an invidious position and someone will be very disappointed by the way they move
It is interesting that May would find it more politically expedient to move to hard Brexit and Corbyn more to the FBPE position. Neither are convinced that provides the way to true salvation really - and I understand why
That does not mean that the tactics and overall competence (of May especially as she actually has something concrete to deliver) cannot be roundly criticised
The people I am still perplexed by are the Tory Remainers - we are told that they are the majority on the backbenchers and are committed to s soft brexit. They have, however, shown no inclination to demonstrate that (apart from very few specific cases) and the excuse that is expected is they do not want to be seen supporting Labour front bench amendments - I find that a really poor excuse. I am not convinced that Soubry and Clarke have too much support on this on the backbenchers either and that we can make some erroneous assumptions of their motivations if we are not careful
Soubry may be saying the right things on Brexit but she has still an appalling record on voting for the destructive policies of this Government so you will not find me showering her with praise and almost treating her as 'one of us' - the arch-architect of a lot of pour problems. Osborne, is also in the same boat
Can I add my compliments to Willow's post
I do have some sympathy for both Corbyn and May in that they are in an invidious position and someone will be very disappointed by the way they move
It is interesting that May would find it more politically expedient to move to hard Brexit and Corbyn more to the FBPE position. Neither are convinced that provides the way to true salvation really - and I understand why
That does not mean that the tactics and overall competence (of May especially as she actually has something concrete to deliver) cannot be roundly criticised
The people I am still perplexed by are the Tory Remainers - we are told that they are the majority on the backbenchers and are committed to s soft brexit. They have, however, shown no inclination to demonstrate that (apart from very few specific cases) and the excuse that is expected is they do not want to be seen supporting Labour front bench amendments - I find that a really poor excuse. I am not convinced that Soubry and Clarke have too much support on this on the backbenchers either and that we can make some erroneous assumptions of their motivations if we are not careful
Soubry may be saying the right things on Brexit but she has still an appalling record on voting for the destructive policies of this Government so you will not find me showering her with praise and almost treating her as 'one of us' - the arch-architect of a lot of pour problems. Osborne, is also in the same boat
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:But isn't McDonnell right that if you compensate shareholders with government bonds it costs nothing? You just issue them, make money from the utilities and pay the bondholders back in due course.Willow904 wrote:Because of the way the Tories privatised water it will be extremely expensive to renationalise. I think its necessary to do so. Indeed I think it a far higher priority than renationalising rail, but given the bias within our media, making the case for water renationalisation against the huge costs, as long as the public are misled over how government finance works and how the assets balance out the debt, will be challenging. I wonder if it was perhaps better when it was just a quiet, overlooked policy in the manifesto providing a mandate to just get on and do it if and when Labour ever get voted into office.
The message that needs to get out is that the government (and us) will win here because these utilities make a lot of money that will be heading to the Treasury instead of to shareholders.
My point is that because the Tories sold off all the reservoirs and infrastructure, they have to be bought back at market values - currently estimated at £67bn, a pretty hefty sum. Being right that the borrowing is offset by gaining an asset isn't going to stop the right wing press from throwing these big numbers around and claiming we can't afford it. And we'll probably be overpaying in reality as these private companies have been boosting their dividends with unsustainable high debt ratios that won't be justifiable when taken back into the public sector. We were ripped off by the Tories when they privatised water leaving us having to pay through the nose to get it back. Unfortunately I don't think there is a pain free way of getting round that. If Labour want to make the case for water renationalisation then the need for control over vital infrastructure and the looming threat of private company collapse a la Carillion could provide some compelling arguments. It's definitely in the country's interest. I just feel the cost can't be ignored completely and to try to could make Labour appear unrealistic.
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
I agree it will take some uncharacteristically grown up discussions in public, but perhaps people are ready for this. At least McDonnell has started to make the case.Willow904 wrote:PaulfromYorkshire wrote:But isn't McDonnell right that if you compensate shareholders with government bonds it costs nothing? You just issue them, make money from the utilities and pay the bondholders back in due course.Willow904 wrote:Because of the way the Tories privatised water it will be extremely expensive to renationalise. I think its necessary to do so. Indeed I think it a far higher priority than renationalising rail, but given the bias within our media, making the case for water renationalisation against the huge costs, as long as the public are misled over how government finance works and how the assets balance out the debt, will be challenging. I wonder if it was perhaps better when it was just a quiet, overlooked policy in the manifesto providing a mandate to just get on and do it if and when Labour ever get voted into office.
The message that needs to get out is that the government (and us) will win here because these utilities make a lot of money that will be heading to the Treasury instead of to shareholders.
My point is that because the Tories sold off all the reservoirs and infrastructure, they have to be bought back at market values - currently estimated at £67bn, a pretty hefty sum. Being right that the borrowing is offset by gaining an asset isn't going to stop the right wing press from throwing these big numbers around and claiming we can't afford it. And we'll probably be overpaying in reality as these private companies have been boosting their dividends with unsustainable high debt ratios that won't be justifiable when taken back into the public sector. We were ripped off by the Tories when they privatised water leaving us having to pay through the nose to get it back. Unfortunately I don't think there is a pain free way of getting round that. If Labour want to make the case for water renationalisation then the need for control over vital infrastructure and the looming threat of private company collapse a la Carillion could provide some compelling arguments. It's definitely in the country's interest. I just feel the cost can't be ignored completely and to try to could make Labour appear unrealistic.
Governments with sovereign currencies can just issue bonds if it's obvious there is economic benefit. People need to understand this. Essentially it's what was done with the banks isn't it? Though they were much less attractive investment propositions than the utilities.
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
,gilsey wrote:Is May a deep enigma, or is there really nothing there? We don't really have any clue, all we know is that she thinks words are a substitute for action.Willow904 wrote: It's just a theory. And she has never been a staunch remainer, so there's no real reason to assume she's playing such a game, yet at the same time it's so blindingly obvious that a hard Brexit will be economically disastrous I find it hard to believe a serious politician (as opposed to an over-privileged man-child like Rees-Mogg) would truly go through with it.
Is she a serious politician?
I think May worked long and hard to get where she is, a no small feat given her lack of charm or basic competence, so in terms of paying her dues and waiting her turn, she is certainly a serious politician. I don't think she's deep, but she's certainly proved she's tenacious. She appears determined to see Brexit through and given her general lack of ability it seems to me any Brexit she delivers is unlikely to resemble the Brexit she says she's going for, whether genuinely desired or just for show, as to date she's simply accepted what she's given. As such, bar an election, she seems the best hope for anti-Brexiters.
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb
-
- First Secretary of State
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 11:34 am
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
That last sentence may be correct if certain assumptions are madeWillow904 wrote:,gilsey wrote:Is May a deep enigma, or is there really nothing there? We don't really have any clue, all we know is that she thinks words are a substitute for action.Willow904 wrote: It's just a theory. And she has never been a staunch remainer, so there's no real reason to assume she's playing such a game, yet at the same time it's so blindingly obvious that a hard Brexit will be economically disastrous I find it hard to believe a serious politician (as opposed to an over-privileged man-child like Rees-Mogg) would truly go through with it.
Is she a serious politician?
I think May worked long and hard to get where she is, a no small feat given her lack of charm or basic competence, so in terms of paying her dues and waiting her turn, she is certainly a serious politician. I don't think she's deep, but she's certainly proved she's tenacious. She appears determined to see Brexit through and given her general lack of ability it seems to me any Brexit she delivers is unlikely to resemble the Brexit she says she's going for, whether genuinely desired or just for show, as to date she's simply accepted what she's given. As such, bar an election, she seems the best hope for anti-Brexiters.
The problem she has though is that there are more than 48 MPs who would object to her position and so she would be subject to a leadership challenge if she was going soft on Brexit
The outcome would then depend on who the MPs put in front of the members - the Tory members will go right wing
She will obviously try to stall as much as she can but there are two thins against that - the need to legalise the withdrawal agreement by late spring and the sheer annoyance of the EU who would not seem to be in the mood to offer much in the way of an olive branch to the current mob
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
John McDonnell and the 'Preston model'
https://party.coop/2018/02/08/co-operat ... ss-the-uk/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
co-operative-party-to-work-with-labour-to-rebuild-local-economies-across-the-uk
https://party.coop/2018/02/08/co-operat ... ss-the-uk/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
co-operative-party-to-work-with-labour-to-rebuild-local-economies-across-the-uk
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
I still feel renationalising water is something Labour just need to do when they get the chance, without too much fanfare. As long as it's in the manifesto, the mandate is there to do it, so they should just do it. That way you don't run the risk of the right wing press turning the policy toxic with big numbers and fake economics, which they will certainly try to do.PaulfromYorkshire wrote:I agree it will take some uncharacteristically grown up discussions in public, but perhaps people are ready for this. At least McDonnell has started to make the case.Willow904 wrote:PaulfromYorkshire wrote: But isn't McDonnell right that if you compensate shareholders with government bonds it costs nothing? You just issue them, make money from the utilities and pay the bondholders back in due course.
The message that needs to get out is that the government (and us) will win here because these utilities make a lot of money that will be heading to the Treasury instead of to shareholders.
My point is that because the Tories sold off all the reservoirs and infrastructure, they have to be bought back at market values - currently estimated at £67bn, a pretty hefty sum. Being right that the borrowing is offset by gaining an asset isn't going to stop the right wing press from throwing these big numbers around and claiming we can't afford it. And we'll probably be overpaying in reality as these private companies have been boosting their dividends with unsustainable high debt ratios that won't be justifiable when taken back into the public sector. We were ripped off by the Tories when they privatised water leaving us having to pay through the nose to get it back. Unfortunately I don't think there is a pain free way of getting round that. If Labour want to make the case for water renationalisation then the need for control over vital infrastructure and the looming threat of private company collapse a la Carillion could provide some compelling arguments. It's definitely in the country's interest. I just feel the cost can't be ignored completely and to try to could make Labour appear unrealistic.
Governments with sovereign currencies can just issue bonds if it's obvious there is economic benefit. People need to understand this. Essentially it's what was done with the banks isn't it? Though they were much less attractive investment propositions than the utilities.
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 9949
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:18 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
I think a big report on outsourcing/ state ownership is needed. The rail case exists, for sure, but it's been bolstered by bullshit.
Do something like the fiscal advisory group. Pick friends of Labour, no need for libertarians for balance, but make sure you get experts in £67bn is a lot of money.
Do something like the fiscal advisory group. Pick friends of Labour, no need for libertarians for balance, but make sure you get experts in £67bn is a lot of money.
- tinyclanger2
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 9714
- Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 9:18 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Hadn't realised the EU prevented us from labelling food appropriately.Brexit represents chance to rethink food labelling and tackle Britain's obesity crisis, say councils
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/busin ... 02226.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/labell ... slation_en" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Bloody Europe eh.
LET'S FACE IT I'M JUST 'KIN' SEETHIN'
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Writers at the FT appear to be unanimous that the present state is an "organised rip-off"(sic), with even Mr Gove agreeing . As of last September the companies' debts totalled some £42bn, while they were still gaily paying dividends .Tubby Isaacs wrote:I think a big report on outsourcing/ state ownership is needed. The rail case exists, for sure, but it's been bolstered by bullshit.
Do something like the fiscal advisory group. Pick friends of Labour, no need for libertarians for balance, but make sure you get experts in £67bn is a lot of money.
The regulator is totally bloody useless.
https://www.ft.com/content/2beee56a-961 ... 88e51488a0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Richard Murphy agrees with the above author that some kind of not-for-profit, public interest company would be an answer .
http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?s=w ... vatisation" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 4211
- Joined: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 1:22 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Water is easily the best case for nationalisation.
Rail the worst (it largely already is).
Rail the worst (it largely already is).
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Like Welsh Water?frog222 wrote:Writers at the FT appear to be unanimous that the present state is an "organised rip-off"(sic), with even Mr Gove agreeing . As of last September the companies' debts totalled some £42bn, while they were still gaily paying dividends .Tubby Isaacs wrote:I think a big report on outsourcing/ state ownership is needed. The rail case exists, for sure, but it's been bolstered by bullshit.
Do something like the fiscal advisory group. Pick friends of Labour, no need for libertarians for balance, but make sure you get experts in £67bn is a lot of money.
The regulator is totally bloody useless.
https://www.ft.com/content/2beee56a-961 ... 88e51488a0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Richard Murphy agrees with the above author that some kind of not-for-profit, public interest company would be an answer .
http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?s=w ... vatisation" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Certainly works well enough, but then so does Scottish water, which is nationalised. I'm not certain, but a straight renationalisation would seem more straightforward to achieve. How do you engineer a not-for-profit buy out of current ownership?
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Good-afternoon, everyone
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/busin ... 89651.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;SpinningHugo wrote:Water is easily the best case for nationalisation.
Rail the worst (it largely already is).
"Why we might have to nationalise the British car industry after Brexit"
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
(cJA edit)Willow904 wrote:---
How do you engineer a not-for-profit buy out of current ownership?
If the not-for-profit buyer is national government with a manifesto commitment, pass a law in Parliament and make it happen. I don't know if doing so is wise or necessary. Theresa May thinks she's a customer, others might think a compulsory purchase on this scale is outlandish (if it's in the best interests of people and country, then it's not, in my opinion).
There's a fundamental difference between an elected government responsible for the well being of all people and nation and a private company doing business in that country. The two aren't equal. Government is the higher power. The government is the representative of all the people.
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
I'll never forget the PM calling herself a customer of Carillion in the Commons
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Good, stay the hell out.Carillion links put fracking firm’s scheme in doubt
North Yorkshire project halted for inquiry into stability of Third Energy, whose chairman is former chief executive of outsourcing giant
https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... ird-energy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
By the way, national government didn't have a problem running roughshod over community objections there in favour of private industry, did they?
(cJA emphasis)"energy secretary Greg Clark has ordered the start of drilling at Kirby Misperton to be put on hold pending an investigation into the “financial resilience” of Third Energy. Clark’s move, taken after the collapse of outsourcing firm Carillion, came as protest groups and Labour politicians drew attention to the fact that Carillion’s former chief executive, Keith Cochrane, is now the non-executive chairman of Third Energy."
Excellent
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Alan Whitehead MP, shadow minister for energy and climate change, said: “The Tories continue to press ahead with fracking across Yorkshire against the wishes of local communities, despite the environmental risks and suggestions that the economic opportunities are considerably less than initially projected.
“Serious questions need to be asked as to why the instability of this company was only noticed now, just before fracking was due to start and worryingly there appears to be an element of involvement of former Carillion executives in the company.
“Labour would ban fracking, instead investing in renewable and low-carbon energy projects to build the clean economy of the future.”
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Fracking is potentially a big vote loser for the Tories, without question.
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
- tinyclanger2
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 9714
- Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 9:18 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
the only thing i have been entirely consistent on during the course of my life is opposing the Tories and their i'm alright jack mentality
just so you know
just so you know
LET'S FACE IT I'M JUST 'KIN' SEETHIN'
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
I think we're at cross purposes. If the buyer is the government, then that's what I would describe as a straightforward renationalisation, which I thought would be easier to achieve than a Welsh Water arrangement, where a not-for-profit company picked up the pieces of a collapsed super utility which the for profit sector appeared to pass over on account of its liabilities. i.e. it came about haphazardly rather than the result of a deliberate plan. Renationalisation just makes more sense to me as a deliberate plan.citizenJA wrote:(cJA edit)Willow904 wrote:---
How do you engineer a not-for-profit buy out of current ownership?
If the not-for-profit buyer is national government with a manifesto commitment, pass a law in Parliament and make it happen. I don't know if doing so is wise or necessary. Theresa May thinks she's a customer, others might think a compulsory purchase on this scale is outlandish (if it's in the best interests of people and country, then it's not, in my opinion).
There's a fundamental difference between an elected government responsible for the well being of all people and nation and a private company doing business in that country. The two aren't equal. Government is the higher power. The government is the representative of all the people.
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
I didn't know about Welsh Water !Willow904 wrote:I think we're at cross purposes. If the buyer is the government, then that's what I would describe as a straightforward renationalisation, which I thought would be easier to achieve than a Welsh Water arrangement, where a not-for-profit company picked up the pieces of a collapsed super utility which the for profit sector appeared to pass over on account of its liabilities. i.e. it came about haphazardly rather than the result of a deliberate plan. Renationalisation just makes more sense to me as a deliberate plan.citizenJA wrote:(cJA edit)Willow904 wrote:---
How do you engineer a not-for-profit buy out of current ownership?
If the not-for-profit buyer is national government with a manifesto commitment, pass a law in Parliament and make it happen. I don't know if doing so is wise or necessary. Theresa May thinks she's a customer, others might think a compulsory purchase on this scale is outlandish (if it's in the best interests of people and country, then it's not, in my opinion).
There's a fundamental difference between an elected government responsible for the well being of all people and nation and a private company doing business in that country. The two aren't equal. Government is the higher power. The government is the representative of all the people.
Make them an offer they can't refuseWillow904 wrote:Like Welsh Water?frog222 wrote:Writers at the FT appear to be unanimous that the present state is an "organised rip-off"(sic), with even Mr Gove agreeing . As of last September the companies' debts totalled some £42bn, while they were still gaily paying dividends .Tubby Isaacs wrote:I think a big report on outsourcing/ state ownership is needed. The rail case exists, for sure, but it's been bolstered by bullshit.
Do something like the fiscal advisory group. Pick friends of Labour, no need for libertarians for balance, but make sure you get experts in £67bn is a lot of money.
The regulator is totally bloody useless.
https://www.ft.com/content/2beee56a-961 ... 88e51488a0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Richard Murphy agrees with the above author that some kind of not-for-profit, public interest company would be an answer .
http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?s=w ... vatisation" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Certainly works well enough, but then so does Scottish water, which is nationalised. I'm not certain, but a straight renationalisation would seem more straightforward to achieve. How do you engineer a not-for-profit buy out of current ownership?
Do it by regions I supppose...
It'd have to be an exchange of some sort, they getting some sort of bonds, probably very long term as discussed by Richard Murphy. At the mom they are making out like utter and complete bandits, so pressure must be applied, perhaps through chasing up the tax cheating angle .
Gove at Environment has already been doing some of that, some already closing their offshore entities, but much more to be done on those crazy debt leverls v. dividends (see Carillion) ...
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Chris Peace.
Average age of voters must have been in the eighties.I didn't ask for a Frankie Howard impersonation.
Average age of voters must have been in the eighties.I didn't ask for a Frankie Howard impersonation.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Standout candidate.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
About 300 there.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Mean, mode or median though?HindleA wrote:Chris Peace.
Average age of voters must have been in the eighties.I didn't ask for a Frankie Howard impersonation.
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Mode,though the mean wouldn't have been much less,a handful of under 60.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Harry Barnes still involved(ex MP)
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Good bloke.HindleA wrote:Harry Barnes still involved(ex MP)
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Non postal votes clarification.
- tinyclanger2
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 9714
- Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 9:18 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Don't cry for Brits Europeans...
[youtube]-EsaAzkOMbc[/youtube]
[youtube]-EsaAzkOMbc[/youtube]
LET'S FACE IT I'M JUST 'KIN' SEETHIN'
- tinyclanger2
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 9714
- Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 9:18 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Heeeey Europeans
LET'S FACE IT I'M JUST 'KIN' SEETHIN'
- tinyclanger2
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 9714
- Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 9:18 pm
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
What a monumental waste of time it all is
LET'S FACE IT I'M JUST 'KIN' SEETHIN'
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
Tarquin didn't get entry,I did warn him.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ ... ssion=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Scathing secret reviews of Tories' flagship benefit shake-up detailed for the first time
https://www.parliament.uk/business/comm ... ort-17-19/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Universal Credit project reviews reveal biggest challenges still to come
They've all fucked off.
Scathing secret reviews of Tories' flagship benefit shake-up detailed for the first time
https://www.parliament.uk/business/comm ... ort-17-19/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Universal Credit project reviews reveal biggest challenges still to come
They've all fucked off.
Re: Saturday 10th & Sunday 11th February 2018
HindleA wrote:https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ ... ssion=true
Scathing secret reviews of Tories' flagship benefit shake-up detailed for the first time
https://www.parliament.uk/business/comm ... ort-17-19/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Universal Credit project reviews reveal biggest challenges still to come
They've all fucked off.
[youtube]NNyKv76ERSk[/youtube]