FlyTheNest

A haven
It is currently Sun 15 Dec, 2019 10:34 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » The Daily Politics

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Welcome to FTN. New posters are welcome to join the conversation. You can follow us on Twitter @FlythenestHaven You are responsible for the content you post. This is a public forum. Treat it as if you are speaking in a crowded room. Site admin and Moderators are volunteers who will respond as quickly as they are able to when made aware of any complaints. Please do not post copyrighted material without the original authors permission.



Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 2 of 2
  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
citizenJA
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 3:14 pm 
Online
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 11 Sep, 2014 11:22 am
Posts: 18004
Has thanked: 97186 times
Been thanked: 14447 times
Wait...the line was, 'All you Labour PM's fall in the love with the Queen'
Top
 Profile  
 
RogerOThornhill
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 3:24 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:18 pm
Posts: 8561
Has thanked: 4941 times
Been thanked: 19151 times
Anyone fancy reading an utterly ill-informed pile of shite about school spending? Go on, you know you want to...

https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/t ... 1528883418

Quote:
As table 4 overleaf illustrates, the overwhelming amount of money spent by schools is on staff costs. The biggest item of expenditure of schools in England was teaching staff costs, with schools spending an average of £783,326 last year. This is more than 11 times the amount spent on learning resources for children.12 This is significant for a number of reasons. It highlights the fact that pay for salary is the biggest item of expenditure for schools in England. It also reveals just how much more is being spent by schools on teaching staff costs than on educational resources for children.


:roll:

It gets worse...

Quote:
The third largest item of expenditure is on administrative and clerical staff. Schools in England, therefore, spent on average £86,825 on staff who have limited contact with children.18 This is money which could have been spent on educational resources for pupils.


Yeah, who needs a school office anyway?

Cretin.

_________________
If I'm not here, then I'll be in the library. Or the other library.
Top
 Profile  
 
adam
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 3:29 pm 
Online
Speaker of the House
User avatar

Joined: Wed 27 Aug, 2014 8:15 pm
Posts: 2656
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 5119 times
It is, by any chance, written by somebody who has some educational resources they'd like to sell?

_________________
The forest was shrinking but the trees kept voting for the axe as its handle was made of wood and they thought it was one of them
Top
 Profile  
 
gilsey
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 3:33 pm 
Online
First Secretary of State

Joined: Thu 28 Aug, 2014 9:51 am
Posts: 3480
Has thanked: 6517 times
Been thanked: 7352 times
HindleA wrote:
https://www.leighday.co.uk/News/News-2018/June-2018/First-legal-challenge-against-Universal-Credit-fin

Quote:
Commenting on the case, Tessa Gregory a partner at Leigh Day, who represented both claimants, said:

“This is the first legal test of the roll out of Universal Credit and the system has been found to be unlawfully discriminating against some of society’s most vulnerable.........................................

“Today’s decision shows again that Universal Credit is not delivering what was promised at the outset. It is not working. It’s not working for the disabled, it’s not working for parents, it’s not working for low-income and part-time employees and it’s not working for the self-employed.

“The government needs to halt the rollout and completely overhaul the system to meet peoples’ needs, not condemn them to destitution. If this doesn’t happen further legal challenges will inevitably follow.”

You wouldn't expect lawyers in general to be anything but Conservative but this govt seems bent on turning them off in droves, judging by my twitter feed. See also legal aid, shambolic court system, housing, immigration, etc.

_________________
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
Top
 Profile  
 
RogerOThornhill
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 3:33 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:18 pm
Posts: 8561
Has thanked: 4941 times
Been thanked: 19151 times
No, he's a "researcher" for the TPA who seems never to have set foot in a school or knows what goes on there.

_________________
If I'm not here, then I'll be in the library. Or the other library.
Top
 Profile  
 
gilsey
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 3:35 pm 
Online
First Secretary of State

Joined: Thu 28 Aug, 2014 9:51 am
Posts: 3480
Has thanked: 6517 times
Been thanked: 7352 times
frog222 wrote:
HindleA wrote:
https://www.leighday.co.uk/News/News-2018/June-2018/First-legal-challenge-against-Universal-Credit-fin


First legal challenge against Universal Credit finds Government acted unlawfully

"" Prior to moving, both TP and AR were in receipt of the Severe Disability Premium (SDP) and Enhanced Disability Premium (EDP), which were specifically aimed at meeting the additional care needs of severely disabled people living alone with no carer.

Recently released figures from the DWP suggest that 500,000 individuals are in receipt of the SDP . Both the SDP and EDP have been axed and are not available under Universal Credit.

When they moved both TP and AR were required to make a claim for Universal Credit as they moved into local authorities where the controversial new benefit was being rolled out. According to both the men, they were advised by DWP staff that their benefit entitlement would not change.""

Anyone becoming severely disabled after the introduction of UC won't be entitled to 'transitional protection' and will just have to suck it up, I assume.

_________________
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
Top
 Profile  
 
RogerOThornhill
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 3:37 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:18 pm
Posts: 8561
Has thanked: 4941 times
Been thanked: 19151 times
Another one...

Quote:
It is therefore clear that schools in England are spending vast amounts of money on staff costs and other items of expenditure. Although some of this is essential, questions should be asked whether the vast majority of it is essential and represents good value for money, especially when one considers that this money could be spent on educational resources for pupils.



:D

Actually I'll edit it...

_________________
If I'm not here, then I'll be in the library. Or the other library.
Top
 Profile  
 
adam
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 3:43 pm 
Online
Speaker of the House
User avatar

Joined: Wed 27 Aug, 2014 8:15 pm
Posts: 2656
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 5119 times
We tend to take the view that the best educational resources we have are teaching staff and support staff, so we deliberately overstaff departments so they can plan on using their additionality - team teaching, small group and one to one stuff, more space for preparation time, more chance for specialists in particular areas to lead...

_________________
The forest was shrinking but the trees kept voting for the axe as its handle was made of wood and they thought it was one of them
Top
 Profile  
 
HindleA
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 3:44 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 26500
Location: Half way to paradise.
Has thanked: 18632 times
Been thanked: 35857 times
@gilsey,not the only removal/"reform" applicable,if you happen to be in the nexus,one of a few.Taken with the stated intention to increase charging for any support,very dark days indeed.There were reasons,filling gaps etc historical amnesia and/or pure misanthropy.
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 3:44 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 7838
Has thanked: 2471 times
Been thanked: 12659 times
AnatolyKasparov wrote:
Apropos of not much in particular, apparently one of the PMs that Brenda got on best with back in the day was Harold Wilson.

No-one can resist a Huddersfield lad ;-)
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 4:12 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 7838
Has thanked: 2471 times
Been thanked: 12659 times
When even LauraK starts taking the piss, they are in trouble!

@bbclaurak

1. Amendmentgate latest - Remainers fear No 10 has stuck in a kicker that makes amendment meaningless by making it unamendable (I know) and as far as they are concerned, that's not what they agreed to

2. In the manner of these kinds of things the architect of the deal, Dominic Grieve, is now on a train, no one knows exactly what is going on and it's meant to be published in the next 21 minutes

3. Essentially - not certain that the compromise that saved the govt from defeat on Tuesday is going to hold
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 4:20 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 7838
Has thanked: 2471 times
Been thanked: 12659 times
@Anna_Soubry
6m6 minutes ago

I understand the Govt has tabled an amendment that has not been agreed by Dominic Grieve. Grateful for the conversations but without consultation what was agreed earlier today has been changed.
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 4:23 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 7838
Has thanked: 2471 times
Been thanked: 12659 times
@bbclaurak

Remainers rejecting govt's compromise-Grieve says govt amendment is 'unacceptable' - govt has indeed made it unamendable which means they could theoretically turn it into a confidence vote - Grieve says it was 'inexplicably changed' at last minute, and was not agreed by him
Top
 Profile  
 
PorFavor
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 5:31 pm 
Online
Prime Minister

Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 11:18 am
Posts: 12759
Has thanked: 24638 times
Been thanked: 21202 times
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
@bbclaurak

Remainers rejecting govt's compromise-Grieve says govt amendment is 'unacceptable' - govt has indeed made it unamendable which means they could theoretically turn it into a confidence vote - Grieve says it was 'inexplicably changed' at last minute, and was not agreed by him


Where's Robert Peston when you need him . . . ?
Top
 Profile  
 
Willow904
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 5:38 pm 
Online
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 1:40 pm
Posts: 6190
Has thanked: 11515 times
Been thanked: 14274 times
May's not concerned about this, then:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... h-may-fail
Quote:
Rebel peers are awaiting the outcome of talks between Conservative MPs and the government over a meaningful parliamentary Brexit vote on Thursday, as they weigh up whether to force the issue in the House of Lords next week.

Lord Hailsham – the former Tory cabinet minister Douglas Hogg – is poised to table his amendment, strengthening the hand of parliament in the event that Brexit talks break down, if Commons rebel leader Dominic Grieve is not satisfied with the compromise offered by the government.

_________________
“Of all the trees we could've hit, we had to get one that hits back.”
Top
 Profile  
 
citizenJA
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 6:08 pm 
Online
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 11 Sep, 2014 11:22 am
Posts: 18004
Has thanked: 97186 times
Been thanked: 14447 times
How long do these weekly chats last between qe2 and the PM, please? Anyone know?
Top
 Profile  
 
citizenJA
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 6:09 pm 
Online
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 11 Sep, 2014 11:22 am
Posts: 18004
Has thanked: 97186 times
Been thanked: 14447 times
Politically neutral my a**
Top
 Profile  
 
Willow904
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 6:19 pm 
Online
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 1:40 pm
Posts: 6190
Has thanked: 11515 times
Been thanked: 14274 times
Was May trying to turn the meaningful vote amendment, which she knew she would lose as an ordinary amendment, into a confidence vote making it much harder for the Tory remainers to rebel?

_________________
“Of all the trees we could've hit, we had to get one that hits back.”
Top
 Profile  
 
tinyclanger2
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 6:57 pm 
Online
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 8:18 pm
Posts: 7673
Has thanked: 8179 times
Been thanked: 12242 times
Quote:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... -rees-mogg
A City firm co-founded by the influential Conservative backbencher, Jacob Rees-Mogg, has set up an investment fund in Ireland and is warning prospective clients about the financial dangers of the sort of hard Brexit favoured by the Tory MP.

_________________
LET'S FACE IT I'M JUST 'KIN' SEETHIN'
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 7:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 7838
Has thanked: 2471 times
Been thanked: 12659 times
Sarah Wollaston MP
‏@sarahwollaston

Ah ha, so just to be clear we are now going to have to amend the ‘unamendable’ after the agreed amendable amendment acquired a sneaky sting in the tail. What a time to be alive...
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 7:26 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 7838
Has thanked: 2471 times
Been thanked: 12659 times
Willow904 wrote:
Was May trying to turn the meaningful vote amendment, which she knew she would lose as an ordinary amendment, into a confidence vote making it much harder for the Tory remainers to rebel?

I suspect Willow that trying to analyse the current situation as though it involves rational actors may be misguided :twisted:

May and her team are losing the plot, I'd say.
Top
 Profile  
 
tinyclanger2
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 7:29 pm 
Online
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 8:18 pm
Posts: 7673
Has thanked: 8179 times
Been thanked: 12242 times
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
Sarah Wollaston MP
‏@sarahwollaston

Ah ha, so just to be clear we are now going to have to amend the ‘unamendable’ after the agreed amendable amendment acquired a sneaky sting in the tail. What a time to be alive...


Have just watched Iron Sky.
Not sure why.
But anyway, it felt quite plausible.

_________________
LET'S FACE IT I'M JUST 'KIN' SEETHIN'
Top
 Profile  
 
citizenJA
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 8:38 pm 
Online
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 11 Sep, 2014 11:22 am
Posts: 18004
Has thanked: 97186 times
Been thanked: 14447 times
goodnight, everyone
love,
cJA
Top
 Profile  
 
PorFavor
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 8:39 pm 
Online
Prime Minister

Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 11:18 am
Posts: 12759
Has thanked: 24638 times
Been thanked: 21202 times
@citizenJA

Night night.
Top
 Profile  
 
PorFavor
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 8:47 pm 
Online
Prime Minister

Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 11:18 am
Posts: 12759
Has thanked: 24638 times
Been thanked: 21202 times
tinyclanger2 wrote:
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
Sarah Wollaston MP
‏@sarahwollaston

Ah ha, so just to be clear we are now going to have to amend the ‘unamendable’ after the agreed amendable amendment acquired a sneaky sting in the tail. What a time to be alive...


Have just watched Iron Sky.
Not sure why.
But anyway, it felt quite plausible.


Kelly's Heroes - the bridge scene (again).

(Not familiar with Iron Sky - other than being aware that it's sci-fi (I think)).



Edited - brackets
Top
 Profile  
 
Eric_WLothian
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 8:56 pm 
Offline
Secretary of State

Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 10:49 am
Posts: 1209
Has thanked: 488 times
Been thanked: 1849 times
citizenJA wrote:
How long do these weekly chats last between qe2 and the PM, please? Anyone know?


Sorry about the source!

Quote:
The audience can be no more than an informal briefing – a courtesy where the PM brings the sovereign up to speed with what happened in the past week and what is expected in the following one – or it can be a great deal more. Some sessions last barely 20 minutes with no refreshment, others stretch to an hour or two with drinks.


https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/37 ... M-revealed
Top
 Profile  
 
Sky'sGoneOut
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 11:15 pm 
Online
Speaker of the House

Joined: Sat 30 Aug, 2014 12:11 am
Posts: 2389
Has thanked: 255 times
Been thanked: 2322 times
Question Time report...I got in late and a bit pissed so only saw the last half an hour but I'll offer some observations regardless.

It was from Caernarfon, I practically camped there last weekend.

Isabel Oakeshott: I became fixated upon the fact that her make up meant her face didn't match the rest of her body. This resulted in a bit of a 'Joker effect' which I found a bit disquieting. Also she appeared to be a simpleton.

Matthew Wright: Played to the gallery. Sleazy populist playing a man of the people. Didn't like him.

Dominic Grieve: Tory lawyer nerd. I don't think he's the sharpest tool in the box but he's an honourable Tory and they're like hen's teeth so Chris Packham should try to preserve him as a species in some kind of breeding programme.

John Mann: An embarrassment to the Labour party. I don't think I need go any further than that.

Leanne Wood: Wonderful, if it wasn't for people like Leanne Wales would be a dull backwater afterthought left to rot by the English, people may mock Plaid Cymru but without them Wales wouldn't have the distinctive different character it has today, especially in North Wales.
Top
 Profile  
 
tinyclanger2
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 11:25 pm 
Online
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 8:18 pm
Posts: 7673
Has thanked: 8179 times
Been thanked: 12242 times
Quote:
Arron Banks says Brexit is exhausting and may leave politics
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... is-tedious


Quote:
“We’re still very friendly with the DUP and I still think [Nigel] Farage to enter parliament via the DUP is a viable option, they love him over there,” said Banks.

_________________
LET'S FACE IT I'M JUST 'KIN' SEETHIN'
Top
 Profile  
 
tinyclanger2
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 11:26 pm 
Online
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 8:18 pm
Posts: 7673
Has thanked: 8179 times
Been thanked: 12242 times
Quote:
Banks, who said he would be taking a long break over the summer, concluded: “This Brexit stuff is all getting very tedious.”


:flick: :flick: :flick: :flick: :flick: :flick: :flick: :flick: :flick: :flick:

_________________
LET'S FACE IT I'M JUST 'KIN' SEETHIN'
Top
 Profile  
 
tinyclanger2
PostPosted: Thu 14 Jun, 2018 11:28 pm 
Online
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 8:18 pm
Posts: 7673
Has thanked: 8179 times
Been thanked: 12242 times
Quote:
New York files lawsuit against Trump and his charity over 'persistently illegal conduct'
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 98996.html

_________________
LET'S FACE IT I'M JUST 'KIN' SEETHIN'
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 2 of 2
  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » The Daily Politics

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: adam, AnatolyKasparov, citizenJA, gilsey, PorFavor, refitman, Sky'sGoneOut, tinyclanger2, Willow904 and 38 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Switch to mobile style
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group