Wednesday 9th January 2019
Forum rules
Welcome to FTN. New posters are welcome to join the conversation. You can follow us on Twitter @FlythenestHaven You are responsible for the content you post. This is a public forum. Treat it as if you are speaking in a crowded room. Site admin and Moderators are volunteers who will respond as quickly as they are able to when made aware of any complaints. Please do not post copyrighted material without the original authors permission.
Welcome to FTN. New posters are welcome to join the conversation. You can follow us on Twitter @FlythenestHaven You are responsible for the content you post. This is a public forum. Treat it as if you are speaking in a crowded room. Site admin and Moderators are volunteers who will respond as quickly as they are able to when made aware of any complaints. Please do not post copyrighted material without the original authors permission.
Wednesday 9th January 2019
Morning all.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Deranged brainy Gerrard commits Labour to a no confidence vote (5,8).
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
There can't possibly be many capable of committing Labour to a no confidence vote. Or do I have that wrong? I've tried figuring it out. I'm embarrassed admitting I can't. I've looked at the news and still can't. I've stopped drinking tea and coffee. I think I'm trying to use that as an excuse. It's not working. I know that.PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Deranged brainy Gerrard commits Labour to a no confidence vote (5,8).
Good-morning, everyone
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
@JA
Yes I'm sure you are right. Gardiner can't commit Labour to anything.
Indeed someone Tweeted that Labour's position on no confidence had not changed. That is they'll wait until the time is right.
TBF depending on what they know behind the scenes, those two positions may not be incompatible. They may already have decided that the time is right after the Meaningful Vote. But the impression that the vote is certain to fall could help May.
Yes I'm sure you are right. Gardiner can't commit Labour to anything.
Indeed someone Tweeted that Labour's position on no confidence had not changed. That is they'll wait until the time is right.
TBF depending on what they know behind the scenes, those two positions may not be incompatible. They may already have decided that the time is right after the Meaningful Vote. But the impression that the vote is certain to fall could help May.
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Thank you!
Is there chocolate?
Is there chocolate?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Labour Whips
@labourwhips
Significant Amdt to the business of the House motion from Grieve & x-party group which in the event of the deal being defeated on 15 Jan would ensure that the PM has to come back for a further meaningful vote within 3 sitting days, rather than the 21+7 sitting days under S.13
I don't know if Bercow has allowed a vote. It's strange because it was said (can't remember by whom) that amendments to this motion were not possible!
@labourwhips
Significant Amdt to the business of the House motion from Grieve & x-party group which in the event of the deal being defeated on 15 Jan would ensure that the PM has to come back for a further meaningful vote within 3 sitting days, rather than the 21+7 sitting days under S.13
I don't know if Bercow has allowed a vote. It's strange because it was said (can't remember by whom) that amendments to this motion were not possible!
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Mr Ethical
@nw_nicholas
Surely it would be cheaper to build a wall around Trump.
@nw_nicholas
Surely it would be cheaper to build a wall around Trump.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Kevin Schofield
@PolhomeEditor
BREAKING: John Bercow has selected the Grieve amendment. Prepare for fireworks
@PolhomeEditor
BREAKING: John Bercow has selected the Grieve amendment. Prepare for fireworks
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Steven Swinford
@Steven_Swinford
We are now in full-fledged constitutional crisis territory.
Bercow has accepted the Grieve amendment which *his own clerks* say is against the standing orders of the House.
This is going to be carnage.
@Steven_Swinford
We are now in full-fledged constitutional crisis territory.
Bercow has accepted the Grieve amendment which *his own clerks* say is against the standing orders of the House.
This is going to be carnage.
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
The govt has a plan? What is he on?Jo Maugham QC
Verified account
@JolyonMaugham
Follow Follow @JolyonMaugham
More
I hate this Government. I hate it for the contempt it has shown for our democratic superstructure: for governance, for the rule of law, and for constitutional norms. But you have to give it this: at least it has a plan. Labour has nothing and is nowhere.
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetor ... atter.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Our guide to how the Government can deliver its Brexit deal in Parliament. Or No Deal. And whether MPs can block the latter."
Conclusion is:
"Our guide to how the Government can deliver its Brexit deal in Parliament. Or No Deal. And whether MPs can block the latter."
Conclusion is:
One of the comments points out article has ignored possibility of no confidence vote leading to short term cross party coalition.The only real way to force a change of course on Brexit is to replace the Government with another one prepared to rule out No Deal. The parliamentary arithmetic suggests that this is unlikely, not least because Jeremy Corbyn continues to keep Labour’s position vague and oppositional. Even were that to change, there are probably less than a handful of Conservative MPs prepared to countenance installing him in Downing Street, even for the sake of blocking ‘no deal’.
Absent that alternative, all the rebels can do is heap pressure on the Prime Minister and hope she buckles. There is no procedural trick that can force her hand.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15751
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Amongst other things, he is "on" the board of a Tory-leaning thinktank!gilsey wrote:The govt has a plan? What is he on?Jo Maugham QC
Verified account
@JolyonMaugham
Follow Follow @JolyonMaugham
More
I hate this Government. I hate it for the contempt it has shown for our democratic superstructure: for governance, for the rule of law, and for constitutional norms. But you have to give it this: at least it has a plan. Labour has nothing and is nowhere.
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15751
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Hmmm, so says a senior Barclaygraph "journalist".PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Steven Swinford
@Steven_Swinford
We are now in full-fledged constitutional crisis territory.
Bercow has accepted the Grieve amendment which *his own clerks* say is against the standing orders of the House.
This is going to be carnage.
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
I thought the last noise I heard out of government regarding non-UK EU citizens resident in the UK was that they weren't going to be charged for the right to remain in the UK at all. Does anyone else recollect that or have I got that wrong?Government refuses to pay £65 fee for EU citizens in civil service
Ministers say civil service staff from EU countries must pay to register their right to remain in UK
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... il-service" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Government has no idea how many non-UK EU citizens are employed in the civil service, according to the article.
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Somebody please make it stop.Rob Merrick
@Rob_Merrick
Brexit minister Chris Heaton-Harris says number of bits of secondary legislation to be passed before March 29 now “below 600”
So, only about 13 EVERY sitting day
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... t-concerns" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
"Government has no idea" in general.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Re.TV license for over 75's ,consultation ends 12th February
https://www.bbc.com/yoursay" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://campaigns.ageuk.org.uk/page/342 ... d=1unr39mb" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.bbc.com/yoursay" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://campaigns.ageuk.org.uk/page/342 ... d=1unr39mb" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Gripping, if absurd, stuff in the House.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
https://england.shelter.org.uk/support_ ... ialHousing" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
This might be worth saving for future reference: " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Also, Rachel Riley might be being sued.
Also, Rachel Riley might be being sued.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
https://mainlymacro.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... d.html?m=1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Yes it's very good.refitman wrote:This might be worth saving for future reference: " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Also, Rachel Riley might be being sued.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Crispin Blunt accuses Bercow of failing to be impartial.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15751
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
One of the reasons why people take the referendum result seriously - despite all the well known shortcomings - is that it had the highest turnout of any UK-wide election since the 1992 GE. Its not so easy to for many just toss that aside, even if you voted for remain.HindleA wrote:https://mainlymacro.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... d.html?m=1
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Grieve amendment passes.
So, May has 3 days to bring back a Plan B.
So, May has 3 days to bring back a Plan B.
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Neatly demonstrating how comprehensively f***** our democracy is, if we can't routinely get anywhere near three quarters of the adult population to vote in a general election.AnatolyKasparov wrote:
One of the reasons why people take the referendum result seriously - despite all the well known shortcomings - is that it had the highest turnout of any UK-wide election since the 1992 GE. Its not so easy to for many just toss that aside, even if you voted for remain.
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Have they agreed whether this is a new debate or a continuation of the old debate yet? If it's not a new one then people who spoke last time can't speak again...
I still believe in a town called Hope
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15751
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
If she hadn't been so transparent about her intent to simply run the clock down if her deal was rejected, maybe this might never have happened?PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Grieve amendment passes.
So, May has 3 days to bring back a Plan B.
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
"Votes for lawnmowing tortoises"
"Tarquin for PM"
"Tarquin for PM"
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15751
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
A very fair point, though turnout has been on an upward trend in recent GEs and I expect that to continue next time.gilsey wrote:Neatly demonstrating how comprehensively f***** our democracy is, if we can't routinely get anywhere near three quarters of the adult population to vote in a general election.AnatolyKasparov wrote:
One of the reasons why people take the referendum result seriously - despite all the well known shortcomings - is that it had the highest turnout of any UK-wide election since the 1992 GE. Its not so easy to for many just toss that aside, even if you voted for remain.
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Hopefully the rather obvious attempt to deny will backfire
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
The 2016 EU referendum 72.2% voter turnoutgilsey wrote:Neatly demonstrating how comprehensively f***** our democracy is, if we can't routinely get anywhere near three quarters of the adult population to vote in a general election.AnatolyKasparov wrote:
One of the reasons why people take the referendum result seriously - despite all the well known shortcomings - is that it had the highest turnout of any UK-wide election since the 1992 GE. Its not so easy to for many just toss that aside, even if you voted for remain.
The 2017 GE turnout 68.7%
Who got to vote in the EU referendum? Who got to vote in the GE? Mickey mousing around with peoples' voting rights can undermine democratic legitimacy though restricting voting privileges for different electoral exercises isn't always wrong. The 2016 EU referendum electorate composition is confusing. Cameron declined honouring a manifesto commitment reinstating the voting rights to UK citizens living abroad for 15+ years, for example.
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
AgreedHindleA wrote:Hopefully the rather obvious attempt to deny will backfire
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
https://www.inquest.org.uk/amy-el-keria-priory-guilty" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15751
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Bit of an eventful day for things to go so quiet?
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
AnatolyKasparov wrote:Bit of an eventful day for things to go so quiet?
Well, it takes it out of you . . .
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ver-brexit'A lot of people are angry': Bristol West locals say Labour not listening over Brexit
Bristol West has become, in two short elections, one of Labour’s safest seats. Held by the LibDems until 2015, its student-heavy population turned decisively to Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour in 2017, a year after registering the highest anti-Brexit vote for any seat outside London.
Thangam Debbonaire represents the constituency with an extraordinary 37,336 majority. Yet, the MP believes her margin could “just as easily disappear”, arguing she had a votes windfall in 2017 from people impressed by Corbyn, students angry about fees, sheer hostility to the Conservatives, and, of course, Brexit.
The question is whether that coalition of voters is fracturing amid Labour’s reluctance to articulate a position that is clearly anti-Brexit. (Guardian)
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Sky TV News is reporting that nine different consultancy firms have raked in £75m in relation to Brexit. The Cabinet Office won't release details - so we don't know what they are actually being paid to do. The matter is now being referred to the National Audit Office. Which will please Andrea Leadsom who, as was demonstrated today, likes things to be out in the open.
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Well, Rachel Riley's just had an absolute car-crash of an interview, with Kris G-M, on Channel 4. Oops
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
I'm sure the names won't surprise anyone in the slightest: Deloitte, Accenture, PwC, Bain, McKinsey and Boston Consulting.PorFavor wrote:Sky TV News is reporting that nine different consultancy firms have raked in £75m in relation to Brexit. The Cabinet Office won't release details - so we don't know what they are actually being paid to do. The matter is now being referred to the National Audit Office. Which will please Andrea Leadsom who, as was demonstrated today, likes things to be out in the open.
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
Ouch.
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
goodnight, everyone
love,
cJA
love,
cJA
Re: Wednesday 9th January 2019
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/ ... b69ae05509" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Calling for an extension is certainly a step up from opposing no deal. It is at least a positive action, but unless parliament can find a majority to agree on what they wish to accomplish during an extension, we're not much further along in some respects.
Well an extension would certainly make sense for us but I can't help but wonder how the EU would see it. Personally I'd want to know what would change during that extension. If parliamentary arithmetic were to change via a GE or a new mandate established via another referendum an extension would be part of achieving a solution to the impasse. Or if May was making progress getting the WA and accompanying legislation through Parliament and needed extra time to complete ratification, a short extension would surely be forthcoming. What the EU is less likely to be keen on is an extension in which we simply prolong the indecision.Delaying Brexit “may well be inevitable now” because of Tory government chaos and parliamentary deadlock, Labour has warned for the first time.
In a major shift, shadow Brexit secretary Keir Starmer said that MPs would move to extend talks with Brussels rather than crash out of the EU without a deal on March 29.
Calling for an extension is certainly a step up from opposing no deal. It is at least a positive action, but unless parliament can find a majority to agree on what they wish to accomplish during an extension, we're not much further along in some respects.
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb