FlyTheNest

A haven
It is currently Mon 25 Jan, 2021 8:03 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » The Daily Politics

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Welcome to FTN. New posters are welcome to join the conversation. You can follow us on Twitter @FlythenestHaven You are responsible for the content you post. This is a public forum. Treat it as if you are speaking in a crowded room. Site admin and Moderators are volunteers who will respond as quickly as they are able to when made aware of any complaints. Please do not post copyrighted material without the original authors permission.



Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 1 of 1
  [ 25 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
refitman
 Post subject: Monday 7th January 2019
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 7:09 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:22 pm
Posts: 4283
Location: Wombwell, United Kingdom
Has thanked: 1167 times
Been thanked: 7959 times
Morning all.
Top
 Profile  
 
HindleA
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 7:26 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 11:40 pm
Posts: 27400
Location: Three quarters way to hell
Has thanked: 18847 times
Been thanked: 36876 times
https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... ssion=true
Top
 Profile  
 
RogerOThornhill
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 9:44 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:18 pm
Posts: 9863
Has thanked: 5195 times
Been thanked: 21433 times
Morning all.

On the way to and from the newsagent I met the usual small group of parents with kids who hadn't read the communication from school properly and assumed that school was open today...one woman told me she definitely read an email saying it was Monday 7th....which I checked when I got home and of course it said Tuesday 8th...

Apparently Boris has used his weekly column to attack May's plan - yes, I was shocked too. I love Andrew Sparrow's first comment on the extract...

Quote:
Like many of Johnson’s Brexit assertions, this is, even on the most generous of assessments, questionable.


:D

_________________
If I'm not here, then I'll be in the library. Or the other library.
Top
 Profile  
 
adam
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 10:12 am 
Offline
First Secretary of State
User avatar

Joined: Wed 27 Aug, 2014 8:15 pm
Posts: 3210
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 6093 times
Tea spilt on laptop Saturday morning (not by me). Hoping it's just the keyboard that's knackered - think might have got away with just that. Time to check nature of 'accidental damage' cover on insurance and hope that I actually named the laptop as a specific valuable item (I think I did). Although my last experience with trying to make an insurance claim for something was so shite I ended up giving up and paying for the thing myself.

We have a nice shiny new building, supposed to have been ready beginning of last December, that we've moved into this morning. Not much works.

_________________
I still believe in a town called Hope
Top
 Profile  
 
AnatolyKasparov
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 10:16 am 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 8:26 pm
Posts: 11886
Has thanked: 1188 times
Been thanked: 22330 times
HindleA wrote:
https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jan/07/need-to-sign-on-youll-have-to-walk-24-miles-to-jobcentre?CMP=share_btn_tw&__twitter_impression=true


Good for the soul. Or something.
Top
 Profile  
 
citizenJA
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 11:48 am 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 11 Sep, 2014 11:22 am
Posts: 20441
Has thanked: 106915 times
Been thanked: 15427 times
Good-morning, everyone
Top
 Profile  
 
AnatolyKasparov
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 12:12 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 8:26 pm
Posts: 11886
Has thanked: 1188 times
Been thanked: 22330 times
Morefternoon, even?
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 1:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 8088
Has thanked: 2483 times
Been thanked: 13113 times
Fat nylon prick is confused representing the SDP on Politics Live (7,6).
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 1:13 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 8088
Has thanked: 2483 times
Been thanked: 13113 times
Amusing clip from Owen Jones

https://twitter.com/OwenJones84/status/ ... 3035345920
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 1:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 8088
Has thanked: 2483 times
Been thanked: 13113 times
AnatolyKasparov wrote:
Morefternoon, even?

You don't spell it like that! ;-)
Top
 Profile  
 
gilsey
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 2:21 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Thu 28 Aug, 2014 9:51 am
Posts: 4558
Has thanked: 7266 times
Been thanked: 9230 times
The A-Z of Universal Credit

_________________
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
Top
 Profile  
 
PorFavor
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 2:21 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 11:18 am
Posts: 14207
Has thanked: 27330 times
Been thanked: 22893 times
Good morfternoon.
Top
 Profile  
 
AnatolyKasparov
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 2:47 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 8:26 pm
Posts: 11886
Has thanked: 1188 times
Been thanked: 22330 times
PorFavor wrote:
Good morfternoon.


I stand corrected.
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 3:32 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 8088
Has thanked: 2483 times
Been thanked: 13113 times
Sour banyan alert!
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 4:41 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 8088
Has thanked: 2483 times
Been thanked: 13113 times
Laura Kuenssberg
@bbclaurak

Sounds like PM won't be the one answering the Q that Corbyn has been granted in Commons later - all a bit fluid but sounds like No 10 are planning to send someone else
Top
 Profile  
 
gilsey
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 5:11 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Thu 28 Aug, 2014 9:51 am
Posts: 4558
Has thanked: 7266 times
Been thanked: 9230 times
Quote:
Hilary Benn, the Labour chair of the Commons Brexit committee, asks Barclay to rule out a no-deal Brexit.

Barclay says it is not enough to MPs to be against something. They have to decide what they want. Referring to the letter, signed by more than 200 MPs, urging the government to rule out a no-deal Brexit, he says those MPs favour a variety of alternative options.

Pot, kettle springs to mind.

What was PfY's anagram for Barclay?

_________________
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
Top
 Profile  
 
gilsey
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 5:33 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Thu 28 Aug, 2014 9:51 am
Posts: 4558
Has thanked: 7266 times
Been thanked: 9230 times
Interesting read.
https://gapingsilence.wordpress.com/201 ... from-here/
Quote:
If the party’s committed to a Labour Brexit, that must mean that we know what one of those is – what kind of Brexit would be good for Labour and good for Britain. And if the answer’s ‘none’, there is no way the party can possibly admit it – not without going back on its endorsement of the referendum as a democratic process and all the commitments it’s made since the referendum. Heading towards March 29th denouncing the existing deal and demanding the impossible is probably as close to endorsing Remain as Labour – under any imaginable leader – can get, given the starting-point in 2016. (Which is to say, given that the Labour Party didn’t denounce the referendum and lead a campaign of abstention.)

_________________
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
Top
 Profile  
 
AnatolyKasparov
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 5:34 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 8:26 pm
Posts: 11886
Has thanked: 1188 times
Been thanked: 22330 times
His blog is generally good, if infrequently updated.
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 5:52 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 8088
Has thanked: 2483 times
Been thanked: 13113 times
gilsey wrote:
Quote:
Hilary Benn, the Labour chair of the Commons Brexit committee, asks Barclay to rule out a no-deal Brexit.

Barclay says it is not enough to MPs to be against something. They have to decide what they want. Referring to the letter, signed by more than 200 MPs, urging the government to rule out a no-deal Brexit, he says those MPs favour a variety of alternative options.

Pot, kettle springs to mind.

What was PfY's anagram for Barclay?

He's a good one!

I think I went for "preach absently", but "banters cheaply", "peasantry belch", "patchy enablers" and "herby placentas" all have a certain charm ;-)
Top
 Profile  
 
citizenJA
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 6:09 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 11 Sep, 2014 11:22 am
Posts: 20441
Has thanked: 106915 times
Been thanked: 15427 times
gilsey wrote:
Interesting read.
https://gapingsilence.wordpress.com/201 ... from-here/
Quote:
If the party’s committed to a Labour Brexit, that must mean that we know what one of those is – what kind of Brexit would be good for Labour and good for Britain. And if the answer’s ‘none’, there is no way the party can possibly admit it – not without going back on its endorsement of the referendum as a democratic process and all the commitments it’s made since the referendum. Heading towards March 29th denouncing the existing deal and demanding the impossible is probably as close to endorsing Remain as Labour – under any imaginable leader – can get, given the starting-point in 2016. (Which is to say, given that the Labour Party didn’t denounce the referendum and lead a campaign of abstention.)
That is good
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 7:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 8088
Has thanked: 2483 times
Been thanked: 13113 times
citizenJA wrote:
gilsey wrote:
Interesting read.
https://gapingsilence.wordpress.com/201 ... from-here/
Quote:
If the party’s committed to a Labour Brexit, that must mean that we know what one of those is – what kind of Brexit would be good for Labour and good for Britain. And if the answer’s ‘none’, there is no way the party can possibly admit it – not without going back on its endorsement of the referendum as a democratic process and all the commitments it’s made since the referendum. Heading towards March 29th denouncing the existing deal and demanding the impossible is probably as close to endorsing Remain as Labour – under any imaginable leader – can get, given the starting-point in 2016. (Which is to say, given that the Labour Party didn’t denounce the referendum and lead a campaign of abstention.)
That is good

I thought Barry Gardiner on Ridge got as close as anyone has to explaining this clearly.

It's really important to keep on emphasising that May has got into her unenviable "hole" by having red lines that were irreconcilable.

One that hasn't been discussed for a while perhaps is the possibility of the UK paying for its special access, which is an impossibility for the ERG brigade.
Top
 Profile  
 
Willow904
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 7:27 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 1:40 pm
Posts: 6849
Has thanked: 12370 times
Been thanked: 15561 times
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
I thought Barry Gardiner on Ridge got as close as anyone has to explaining this clearly.

It's really important to keep on emphasising that May has got into her unenviable "hole" by having red lines that were irreconcilable.

One that hasn't been discussed for a while perhaps is the possibility of the UK paying for its special access, which is an impossibility for the ERG brigade.


What exactly would this "special access" be, though? The economic benefit of the single market derives from the four freedoms of movement which turn external markets into one big internal market. You can only either be inside an internal market, which means accepting the four freedoms, or trade with it from the outside. There isn't really anything else. We can get very good terms trading with the EU from the outside, I'm sure, but this is the kind of deal Theresa May appears to be pursuing. I just can't quite see what Labour are offering that is different, except they would actively pursue a customs union, whereas May would just end up in one by default because there is no other acceptable solution to the Irish Border problem. Unless Labour would be willing to commit to the single market, but nothing Corbyn has said suggests this is likely. Without long term promotion of a single market solution it will be hard for Labour to pivot to that position anyway, I would have thought. Besides which, "people's vote" has now got expectations up over somehow being able to remain in the EU, squeezing any single market, soft Brexit compromise out of the picture as far as I can tell.

_________________
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb
Top
 Profile  
 
citizenJA
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 7:53 pm 
Offline
Prime Minister
User avatar

Joined: Thu 11 Sep, 2014 11:22 am
Posts: 20441
Has thanked: 106915 times
Been thanked: 15427 times
goodnight, everyone
love,
cJA
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 9:01 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 8088
Has thanked: 2483 times
Been thanked: 13113 times
Willow904 wrote:
PaulfromYorkshire wrote:
I thought Barry Gardiner on Ridge got as close as anyone has to explaining this clearly.

It's really important to keep on emphasising that May has got into her unenviable "hole" by having red lines that were irreconcilable.

One that hasn't been discussed for a while perhaps is the possibility of the UK paying for its special access, which is an impossibility for the ERG brigade.


What exactly would this "special access" be, though? The economic benefit of the single market derives from the four freedoms of movement which turn external markets into one big internal market. You can only either be inside an internal market, which means accepting the four freedoms, or trade with it from the outside. There isn't really anything else. We can get very good terms trading with the EU from the outside, I'm sure, but this is the kind of deal Theresa May appears to be pursuing. I just can't quite see what Labour are offering that is different, except they would actively pursue a customs union, whereas May would just end up in one by default because there is no other acceptable solution to the Irish Border problem. Unless Labour would be willing to commit to the single market, but nothing Corbyn has said suggests this is likely. Without long term promotion of a single market solution it will be hard for Labour to pivot to that position anyway, I would have thought. Besides which, "people's vote" has now got expectations up over somehow being able to remain in the EU, squeezing any single market, soft Brexit compromise out of the picture as far as I can tell.

IMHO the wiggle room is around Freedom of Movement.

It can't be true that you need complete freedom of movement to have the Single Market, because such a thing has never existed.

It's not appealing because of the racist undertones, but restricting freedom of movement is not inherently racist. And IMHO there has to be some compromise somewhere or it's civil war!
Top
 Profile  
 
PaulfromYorkshire
PostPosted: Mon 07 Jan, 2019 9:56 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 8088
Has thanked: 2483 times
Been thanked: 13113 times
Something like this then

https://labourlist.org/wp-content/uploa ... et-2.0.pdf

Common-Market-2.0
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 1 of 1
  [ 25 posts ] 

Board index » The Daily Politics

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], refitman and 18 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Switch to mobile style
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group