Thursday 13th December 2018
Forum rules
Welcome to FTN. New posters are welcome to join the conversation. You can follow us on Twitter @FlythenestHaven You are responsible for the content you post. This is a public forum. Treat it as if you are speaking in a crowded room. Site admin and Moderators are volunteers who will respond as quickly as they are able to when made aware of any complaints. Please do not post copyrighted material without the original authors permission.
Welcome to FTN. New posters are welcome to join the conversation. You can follow us on Twitter @FlythenestHaven You are responsible for the content you post. This is a public forum. Treat it as if you are speaking in a crowded room. Site admin and Moderators are volunteers who will respond as quickly as they are able to when made aware of any complaints. Please do not post copyrighted material without the original authors permission.
Thursday 13th December 2018
Morning all.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
https://amp.theguardian.com/business/20 ... ssion=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Landlord fined £25,000 over lack of hot water for disabled tenant
Judith Wilson, who owns 300 houses in Kent, ignored council enforcement notices
Landlord fined £25,000 over lack of hot water for disabled tenant
Judith Wilson, who owns 300 houses in Kent, ignored council enforcement notices
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
https://newsthump.com/2018/12/12/63-of- ... brexiters/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"63% of the vote is not a big enough majority ” insist irony- free Brexiters"
"63% of the vote is not a big enough majority ” insist irony- free Brexiters"
(newsthump)Without irony , Jacob Rees- Mogg and those other ERG wankers have suggested the Prime Minister should still resign , while absolutely maintaining that the EU referendum result should remain untouched with a much smaller percentage of the vote of at just 52% .
” It might seem like an inconsistency to you, but I suspect you’ re just not terribly bright, ” said Jacob Rees-Mogg from his ever-punchable face.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Preach absently in a spin for Minister on Today Programme (7,7).
- RogerOThornhill
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 11177
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 10:18 pm
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Morning all.
A rather sombre day in the ROT household - it's five years since I got a call from the hospital which said "We need to update you on what happened during the night..." and we have a funeral to attend later of someone we've known for many years and who knew my mum and dad very well.
A rather sombre day in the ROT household - it's five years since I got a call from the hospital which said "We need to update you on what happened during the night..." and we have a funeral to attend later of someone we've known for many years and who knew my mum and dad very well.
If I'm not here, then I'll be in the library. Or the other library.
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
take care xRogerOThornhill wrote:Morning all.
A rather sombre day in the ROT household - it's five years since I got a call from the hospital which said "We need to update you on what happened during the night..." and we have a funeral to attend later of someone we've known for many years and who knew my mum and dad very well.
I still believe in a town called Hope
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Okay. Well I think the point about 52% being a clear and unambiguous mandate is clearly bollocks but I also agree with him that in the context of a confidence vote within your parliamentary party 63% is desperately weak and really not a secure majority. Assuming she had the payroll vote (which you can't entirely do but I understand the idea) she got the support of about a third of the back benchers - that's incredibly weak.tinybgoat wrote:https://newsthump.com/2018/12/12/63-of- ... brexiters/
"63% of the vote is not a big enough majority ” insist irony- free Brexiters"(newsthump)Without irony , Jacob Rees- Mogg and those other ERG wankers have suggested the Prime Minister should still resign , while absolutely maintaining that the EU referendum result should remain untouched with a much smaller percentage of the vote of at just 52% .
” It might seem like an inconsistency to you, but I suspect you’ re just not terribly bright, ” said Jacob Rees-Mogg from his ever-punchable face.
I still believe in a town called Hope
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
I'm having trouble with that one! My brain's not in gear.PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Preach absently in a spin for Minister on Today Programme (7,7).
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Good morfternoon.
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Good-morning, everyone
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Don't worry, it's not just you. Only yesterday I realised I didn't actually know who the Brexit Secretary was, after Raab.PorFavor wrote:I'm having trouble with that one! My brain's not in gear.PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Preach absently in a spin for Minister on Today Programme (7,7).
Also he's not usually known by his full name, which PfY has used.
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
I'm fairly sure that the reason for everything being rushed yesterday was partly to help Theresa May but, really, who organises a "coup" without having made the necessary preparations for when the moment comes? (Answer: Jacob Rees Mogg. Pillock.)
Edited - typo
Edited - typo
Last edited by PorFavor on Thu 13 Dec, 2018 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
http://www.cascaidr.org.uk/2018/04/01/s ... tm_source=" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
"The listed factors in the wellbeing section 1(2) in the Care Act that must be considered in order to identify the needs properly (there are more in s1(3) mentioned above) include:
(a) personal dignity (including treatment of the individual with respect);
(b) physical and mental health and emotional well-being;
(c) protection from abuse and neglect;
(d) control by the individual over day-to-day life (including over care and support, or support, provided to the individual and the way in which it is provided);
(e) participation in work, education, training or recreation;
(f) social and economic well-being;
(g) domestic, family and personal relationships;
(h) suitability of living accommodation;
(i) the individual’s contribution to society."
(a) personal dignity (including treatment of the individual with respect);
(b) physical and mental health and emotional well-being;
(c) protection from abuse and neglect;
(d) control by the individual over day-to-day life (including over care and support, or support, provided to the individual and the way in which it is provided);
(e) participation in work, education, training or recreation;
(f) social and economic well-being;
(g) domestic, family and personal relationships;
(h) suitability of living accommodation;
(i) the individual’s contribution to society."
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
https://mainlymacro.blogspot.com/2018/1 ... t.html?m=1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
20s ago 05:56
German parliament votes to oppose renegotiation of Brexit deal (Politics Live, Guardian)
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
HindleA wrote:https://mainlymacro.blogspot.com/2018/1 ... t.html?m=1
A majority of Tory voters supported leave so it's not inconceivable that a Tory PM, when push comes to shove, may allow us to go out with no deal as opposed to revoking article 50 and delivering no Brexit at all.I have until recently been unduly pessimistic about the chances of a People’s Vote because I had implicitly assumed that the Brexiters would back a compromise, figuring that it would be a stepping stone to a harder Brexit at some later stage. The fact that for Brexiters a compromise may be worse than staying in the EU will lead them to risk Brexit itself by going to the wire.
If May truly wants to avoid this scenario she needs to move to a softer Brexit position and courting cross party consensus. I'm having difficulty envisaging May making such a bold move, but the fact she can't be challenged again for a year does open up opportunities in this direction which previously weren't really there.
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
No argument with calling JRM a pillock but I've seen a few conspiracy theorists hypothesising that some May supporters sent in letters to Brady so the vote could be precipitated before the ERG could prepare.PorFavor wrote:I'm fairly sure that the reason for everything being rushed yesterday was partly to help Theresa May but, really, who organises a "coup" without having made the necessary preparations for when the moment comes? (Answer: Jacob Rees Mogg. Pillock.)
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
I think that her 'There are no extremists here' shows that she is still effectively beholden to the extremists in her party. It's difficult to know what she's thinking about this (other than 'tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow') - does she think the ERG will eventually decide that something is better than nothing and vote for her deal? I can't see it, and I can't see the DUP voting for it in any circumstances at all. She seems to be short by well over a hundred votes - an awful lot more than she could hope to pick off from the opposition benches. She's not going to get anything substantive from Europe. If she says to the ERG 'it's this or no deal' they will say 'thank you very much, no deal' because they are extremists (resisting the temptation to go to bold or caps lock)(just).Willow904 wrote:HindleA wrote:https://mainlymacro.blogspot.com/2018/1 ... t.html?m=1A majority of Tory voters supported leave so it's not inconceivable that a Tory PM, when push comes to shove, may allow us to go out with no deal as opposed to revoking article 50 and delivering no Brexit at all.I have until recently been unduly pessimistic about the chances of a People’s Vote because I had implicitly assumed that the Brexiters would back a compromise, figuring that it would be a stepping stone to a harder Brexit at some later stage. The fact that for Brexiters a compromise may be worse than staying in the EU will lead them to risk Brexit itself by going to the wire.
If May truly wants to avoid this scenario she needs to move to a softer Brexit position and courting cross party consensus. I'm having difficulty envisaging May making such a bold move, but the fact she can't be challenged again for a year does open up opportunities in this direction which previously weren't really there.
I still believe in a town called Hope
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Strangely enough, I've just come across a blog that explores the possibilities a year's freedom from challenge could present May, as I touched upon in my above comment. They don't seem to be any more optimistic than me that she'll take any of them though:
https://chrisgreybrexitblog.blogspot.co ... l?spref=tw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://chrisgreybrexitblog.blogspot.co ... l?spref=tw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The Brexit Ultras could have unwittingly gifted May, and the country, a slender lifeline – if she’ll use it
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
*HintPorFavor wrote:I'm having trouble with that one! My brain's not in gear.PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Preach absently in a spin for Minister on Today Programme (7,7).
He hasn't been a Minster for very long. And probably won't be!
-
- First Secretary of State
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 11:34 am
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Morning
Best wishes to RoT
I apologise for returning to the board and giving my view - if unwelcome I apologise
I return to the comment I made last night about wanting to see some concrete critique of the position taking by the Labour leadership and how things would have been materially improved by them taking a different direction. I know some of that would be subjective but I would like to see something to coutermand the facts
Most of the comments about future direction I read on here and criticisms are fine and often summarise ssome of my lingering concerns too. However, we do see comments about Labour's 'fanstasy politics' and 'fiddling while Rome butrns' that I feel are unfair and worthy of challenge
My point is that we, as well as most pundits, have an absolutely appalling record of prediction and yet still seem to think our pronouncements are correct The facts and the current situation suggest we should be more respectful of the political nouse of the leadership (although also helped with some good helping of luck as well).
In 2016 Labour was undergoing a party split, 20+ points down in the polls, a self-confident Tory Party with a comfortable majority and with absolutely no say on Brexit.
Moving forward to the end of 2018, we have a Tory minority Government with a PM not commanding a majortiy, the potential to force a GE through a No Confidence vote and opening up the possibility of delaying or even abandoning Brexit. That is nothing to say of a completely split Tory Party, Labour in a much better place than it was and currently not being punished in the polls for not being totally clear on their policy position.
As I said, luck comes into it and some of this was probably always coming to pass with the self-contradictions of Brexit and internal Tory pressures but I am a bit tired of the 'no opposition' and 'we should be 20% ahead' garbage.
In view of that I think we should cut the leadership some slack and accept they may know what they are doing. Past success is not guarantee of future success but I think it is still a better platform than having been wrong!
Remember the Labour wipeout preditions and existential concern from June 2017......?
This does not mean their approach will definitely work by the way and I still have some real concerns but I do think some of the invective and anger I see expressed against Corbyn, when compared to the benefit of the doubt, based on absolutely nothing, given to May both worrying and telling
Best wishes to RoT
I apologise for returning to the board and giving my view - if unwelcome I apologise
I return to the comment I made last night about wanting to see some concrete critique of the position taking by the Labour leadership and how things would have been materially improved by them taking a different direction. I know some of that would be subjective but I would like to see something to coutermand the facts
Most of the comments about future direction I read on here and criticisms are fine and often summarise ssome of my lingering concerns too. However, we do see comments about Labour's 'fanstasy politics' and 'fiddling while Rome butrns' that I feel are unfair and worthy of challenge
My point is that we, as well as most pundits, have an absolutely appalling record of prediction and yet still seem to think our pronouncements are correct The facts and the current situation suggest we should be more respectful of the political nouse of the leadership (although also helped with some good helping of luck as well).
In 2016 Labour was undergoing a party split, 20+ points down in the polls, a self-confident Tory Party with a comfortable majority and with absolutely no say on Brexit.
Moving forward to the end of 2018, we have a Tory minority Government with a PM not commanding a majortiy, the potential to force a GE through a No Confidence vote and opening up the possibility of delaying or even abandoning Brexit. That is nothing to say of a completely split Tory Party, Labour in a much better place than it was and currently not being punished in the polls for not being totally clear on their policy position.
As I said, luck comes into it and some of this was probably always coming to pass with the self-contradictions of Brexit and internal Tory pressures but I am a bit tired of the 'no opposition' and 'we should be 20% ahead' garbage.
In view of that I think we should cut the leadership some slack and accept they may know what they are doing. Past success is not guarantee of future success but I think it is still a better platform than having been wrong!
Remember the Labour wipeout preditions and existential concern from June 2017......?
This does not mean their approach will definitely work by the way and I still have some real concerns but I do think some of the invective and anger I see expressed against Corbyn, when compared to the benefit of the doubt, based on absolutely nothing, given to May both worrying and telling
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Do the May supporters have a plan to break the deadlock now they've got the ERG out of the way, though? Because it would be nice to think someone near the reins of government has a plan as May certainly doesn't seem to, beyond keeping her fingers crossed and hoping everyone else will blink first.gilsey wrote:No argument with calling JRM a pillock but I've seen a few conspiracy theorists hypothesising that some May supporters sent in letters to Brady so the vote could be precipitated before the ERG could prepare.PorFavor wrote:I'm fairly sure that the reason for everything being rushed yesterday was partly to help Theresa May but, really, who organises a "coup" without having made the necessary preparations for when the moment comes? (Answer: Jacob Rees Mogg. Pillock.)
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Now this is an interesting Question Time line-up.
I may even watch for once!
Nicky Morgan, Angela Rayner, David Davis, Caroline Lucas, Jo Brand
Quite how Davis will cope I don't know. Well I do - he'll just grin inanely.
I may even watch for once!
Nicky Morgan, Angela Rayner, David Davis, Caroline Lucas, Jo Brand
Quite how Davis will cope I don't know. Well I do - he'll just grin inanely.
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Don't be soft.howsillyofme1 wrote: I apologise for returning to the board and giving my view - if unwelcome I apologise
Edited to add- I've seen a lot of criticism of Labour's position on the timing of a no confidence vote in other places, but all but none here.
I still believe in a town called Hope
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8331
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
@HowSilly
Good to hear from you.
My take on this is that anyone talking with certainty about the way forward on Brexit deserves to be challenged. The term "uncharted waters" gets overused, but seems appropriate here.
For me the warning signs in a comment are "Labour must.....", "Corbyn has to....."
They clearly don't have to, nor is there any clear reason why they should.
Labour and a bit the SNP are the only groups who are talking about finding a consensus position on Brexit, rather than richocheting referendums between extreme positions. That doesn't make them right, but it deserves serious consideration IMHO.
Good to hear from you.
My take on this is that anyone talking with certainty about the way forward on Brexit deserves to be challenged. The term "uncharted waters" gets overused, but seems appropriate here.
For me the warning signs in a comment are "Labour must.....", "Corbyn has to....."
They clearly don't have to, nor is there any clear reason why they should.
Labour and a bit the SNP are the only groups who are talking about finding a consensus position on Brexit, rather than richocheting referendums between extreme positions. That doesn't make them right, but it deserves serious consideration IMHO.
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
She appears to think she will get something in terms of intent or desire or wishes from the EU about the nature of the backstop, but it appears to be very very clear that all she will get is a bit of hopeful language. It might be worth having a look at what was changed between the first and second versions of the December 2017 agreement when the DUP blew up at the original version - I'll have a look a bit later if nobody gets there first.Willow904 wrote:Do the May supporters have a plan to break the deadlock now they've got the ERG out of the way, though? Because it would be nice to think someone near the reins of government has a plan as May certainly doesn't seem to, beyond keeping her fingers crossed and hoping everyone else will blink first.gilsey wrote:No argument with calling JRM a pillock but I've seen a few conspiracy theorists hypothesising that some May supporters sent in letters to Brady so the vote could be precipitated before the ERG could prepare.PorFavor wrote:I'm fairly sure that the reason for everything being rushed yesterday was partly to help Theresa May but, really, who organises a "coup" without having made the necessary preparations for when the moment comes? (Answer: Jacob Rees Mogg. Pillock.)
I still believe in a town called Hope
- RogerOThornhill
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 11177
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 10:18 pm
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
The replies on this are really rather good...
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If I'm not here, then I'll be in the library. Or the other library.
-
- First Secretary of State
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 11:34 am
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Hi Adam,adam wrote:Don't be soft.howsillyofme1 wrote: I apologise for returning to the board and giving my view - if unwelcome I apologise
Edited to add- I've seen a lot of criticism of Labour's position on the timing of a no confidence vote in other places, but all but none here.
Thank you. Most of the citicism on here is fair and I am not responding to that.....as I said there are lingering concerns.
There are posts, however, that do go too far I think and also I do see the tendency to give May the benfit of the doubt sometimes which I am absolutely against as she has been the one who has been accountable for the mess of the negotiations and her choice of negotiators.
I do think there is a general lack of respect for Corbyn though and it is easy to forget that he has negotiated the path very well indeed up to now. Whether hindsight will draw the same conclusion we can see but he has proved to be right more times than we have to be fair
On the No Confidence vote that is a good example.
The easy option would have been to table this straight away and give in to the pressure coming from others on the opposition benches. He knew he would lose and so kep to his guns and if he had followed Chukka's advice he would have call the vote on the day the 48 letters went in and so manage to unite the Tories. Do any of those calling for the vote to be had, whether pundits or politicians, ever come back and say 'we were wrong'. Like heck do they and we still see Chukka trailing around the TV studios with no sense of humility or contrition.
For a Labour politician to try and call a vote in the Government now when it is obvious it would lose would suggest and ulterior motive that should be treated with the contempt it deserves.
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
yepgilsey wrote:No argument with calling JRM a pillock but I've seen a few conspiracy theorists hypothesising that some May supporters sent in letters to Brady so the vote could be precipitated before the ERG could prepare.PorFavor wrote:I'm fairly sure that the reason for everything being rushed yesterday was partly to help Theresa May but, really, who organises a "coup" without having made the necessary preparations for when the moment comes? (Answer: Jacob Rees Mogg. Pillock.)
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15789
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
I for one am very pleased to see you back here, howsilly. Do please continue to express your views
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
-
- First Secretary of State
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Thu 18 Sep, 2014 11:34 am
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Thanks AK
Was thinking of you when watching chess WC the other week
I think some of these political games are a bit like chess and trying to think moves ahead and forcing your opponent down one path or another whilst defending your own. Sometimes it is difficult for us to guess what moves are right or wrong when looked at in isolation.
Was thinking of you when watching chess WC the other week
I think some of these political games are a bit like chess and trying to think moves ahead and forcing your opponent down one path or another whilst defending your own. Sometimes it is difficult for us to guess what moves are right or wrong when looked at in isolation.
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
I gave up chess for bocce ball
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15789
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
A reasonably left wing panel!PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Now this is an interesting Question Time line-up.
I may even watch for once!
Nicky Morgan, Angela Rayner, David Davis, Caroline Lucas, Jo Brand
Quite how Davis will cope I don't know. Well I do - he'll just grin inanely.
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
I think it was a bogus leadership challenge done after a Tory PM found herself and party humiliated in the House
They're sort of like the Borg except not as charming
They're sort of like the Borg except not as charming
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
she's just come to shopMay said she was not expecting a “breakthrough” on the Brexit deal at this week’s EU summit.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/li ... b33ff8e7c6" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15789
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Sorry for your loss.RogerOThornhill wrote:Morning all.
A rather sombre day in the ROT household - it's five years since I got a call from the hospital which said "We need to update you on what happened during the night..." and we have a funeral to attend later of someone we've known for many years and who knew my mum and dad very well.
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Fiona's had a word?AnatolyKasparov wrote:A reasonably left wing panel!PaulfromYorkshire wrote:Now this is an interesting Question Time line-up.
I may even watch for once!
Nicky Morgan, Angela Rayner, David Davis, Caroline Lucas, Jo Brand
Quite how Davis will cope I don't know. Well I do - he'll just grin inanely.
More likely about m/f balance than political leanings, but still.
DD may be the only male MP they could find daft enough to volunteer.
One world, like it or not - John Martyn
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15789
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
No idea what Bruce's political leanings are these days, but she was a Greenham Common girl in her yoof.
(and I do recall her reporting from Blair's constituency on 1997 GE night, and not exactly looking terribly displeased at what was going on)
(and I do recall her reporting from Blair's constituency on 1997 GE night, and not exactly looking terribly displeased at what was going on)
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Austrian chancellor says it is hard to know what will satisfy Brexiters because their arguments aren't rational (Politics Live, Guardian)
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
PorFavor wrote:Austrian chancellor says it is hard to know what will satisfy Brexiters because their arguments aren't rational (Politics Live, Guardian)
Well I'm glad someone said it!
"Fall seven times, get up eight" - Japanese proverb
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... -childrenP" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... e-patients" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... ve-country" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 27400
- Joined: Tue 26 Aug, 2014 12:40 am
- Location: Three quarters way to hell
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... scuit-fund" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15789
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Talk about the poor just getting crumbs.......HindleA wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... scuit-fund
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Mark Steel:
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/th ... 82026.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/th ... 82026.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
At the moment, May is claiming victory, because she insisted without her the country would collapse into unspeakable irreparable annihilation. And only 38 per cent of her own MPs preferred that to her.
If she’s smart, she’ll make sure all her elections are like this. Either you vote for her, or you’re placed in solitary confinement in a North Korean prison. Then she’ll appear in Downing Street beaming “once again I have a clear mandate, with 57 per cent of voters making a choice of preferring stability with me, to being fed to a rabid pack of wolves”.
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
I paraphrase, but the EU is more or less telling Theresa May to give up (shut up?) and simply revoke (or extend) Article 50. (Sky TV news)
Edited to add - (or extend)
Edited to add - (or extend)
-
- Prime Minister
- Posts: 15789
- Joined: Mon 25 Aug, 2014 9:26 pm
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
Yes, it could well end up not (as our PM still probably imagines) "my deal or no deal" but "in some way delay/set aside A50 or no deal".
Our PM has said she will "never" do that, and will "never" call another referendum either. Which means that a new PM may have to do one (or both) of those things.
Our PM has said she will "never" do that, and will "never" call another referendum either. Which means that a new PM may have to do one (or both) of those things.
"IS TONTY BLAIR BEHIND THIS???!!!!111???!!!"
Re: Thursday 13th December 2018
I..i..i..t's PTO time!